ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

LTB 469/16 OMP Terms of Reference : New Delivery Methods Trial (Small Pouch)

CWU LTB's
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

LTB 469/16 OMP Terms of Reference : New Delivery Methods Trial (Small Pouch)

Post by fishtank »

oypostie wrote:So how is going back to a pouch better than a waistcoat :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh
Both options are stupid. So is the "two bundle" idea.
How many hands do they think we have?
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
Dorset Plodder
Posts: 4351
Joined: 29 Apr 2009, 20:05
Gender: Male

LTB 469/16 OMP Terms of Reference : New Delivery Methods Trial (Small Pouch)

Post by Dorset Plodder »

Darren Bent wrote:Report the builder for those letterbox as get someone to educate him the error of his ways. If I was goverment I would fine those companies for manufacturing and installing those ankle height letterboxes.
I thought they'd brought in some H&S Legislation to use waist high A4 size letterboxes? :hmmmm I've spoken to several installers and they've said, "We basically put the letterbox wherever the customer asks us to". :sad: The odd low letterbox is bad enough but I did deliver to a new estate where the Architect had wanted full length glass front doors with a bloody letterbox at the bottom! :arrrghhh It was like some sort of gym workout doing that estate. :cuppa
Like all Wage Slaves, he had two crosses to bear: The people he worked for and the people he worked with! (Stephen Vizinczey.)
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72657
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

LTB 469/16 OMP Terms of Reference : New Delivery Methods Trial (Small Pouch)

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Dorset Plodder wrote:
Darren Bent wrote:Report the builder for those letterbox as get someone to educate him the error of his ways. If I was goverment I would fine those companies for manufacturing and installing those ankle height letterboxes.
I thought they'd brought in some H&S Legislation to use waist high A4 size letterboxes? :hmmmm I've spoken to several installers and they've said, "We basically put the letterbox wherever the customer asks us to". :sad: The odd low letterbox is bad enough but I did deliver to a new estate where the Architect had wanted full length glass front doors with a bloody letterbox at the bottom! :arrrghhh It was like some sort of gym workout doing that estate. :cuppa
http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... el#p745092" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

LTB 582/16 Low Level Letter Boxes & The CWU 'Low Level Letter Box Campaign’
The CWU therefore considers that the Government should implement the specifications set out in current European Standard (EN 13724) covering private letter boxes. The government has on several occasions rejected calls from the CWU to enact European building regulation standard EN13724 outlawing low level letter boxes by enshrining the standard in Law. In 2002 the European Standard EN 13724 was introduced and states that for "ergonomic and safety reasons" the centreline of the letter box aperture should be at a height between 700 mm (2 ft 3.5 inches) 1700mm (5ft 7inches).
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

LTB 469/16 OMP Terms of Reference : New Delivery Methods Trial (Small Pouch)

Post by k979aaa »

Why have a small pouch to replace a vest if we a sequencing mail on the fly which must mean reading while walking which we are told not to do. The first part of leadership is to do what you ask of your men/women I have yet to see such leadership in doing such a stupid idea and will refrain from doing so till I see them show me the way!
Dorset Plodder
Posts: 4351
Joined: 29 Apr 2009, 20:05
Gender: Male

LTB 469/16 OMP Terms of Reference : New Delivery Methods Trial (Small Pouch)

Post by Dorset Plodder »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... el#p745092" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The CWU therefore considers that the Government should implement the specifications set out in current European Standard (EN 13724) covering private letter boxes. The government has on several occasions rejected calls from the CWU to enact European building regulation standard EN13724 outlawing low level letter boxes by enshrining the standard in Law. In 2002 the European Standard EN 13724 was introduced and states that for "ergonomic and safety reasons" the centreline of the letter box aperture should be at a height between 700 mm (2 ft 3.5 inches) 1700mm (5ft 7inches).
Thanks for the link TBT. As a European Building Standard I take it we'll be ignoring that after Brexit? :hmmmm Nowadays I just deal with low letterboxes by leaving a corner of the mail stuck in the letterbox. Then the buggers have to bend down to free it! So at least it's as much a nuisance to them as it is to me! :thumbup
Like all Wage Slaves, he had two crosses to bear: The people he worked for and the people he worked with! (Stephen Vizinczey.)
ewancurze
Posts: 400
Joined: 22 Jun 2010, 19:25
Gender: Male

LTB 469/16 OMP Terms of Reference : New Delivery Methods Trial (Small Pouch)

Post by ewancurze »

I just screw up the Mail as I put it in,if anyone moans I just say that I can't bend down enough to put it in properly (which is true)
.
.
.
but I may exaggerate a bit!