http://www.halsteadgazette.co.uk/news/1 ... ?ref=var_0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
A Halstead postie has said that new laws on dangerous dogs have probably not gone far enough.
Changes to the Dangerous Dog Act that were announced on Friday mean that a dog owner could face prosecution if their animal attacks someone in their home or private property, unless the victim was a trespasser.
Steve McKenna, who has been a postie for 11 years, was bitten by a German shepherd dog in 2011 whilst he was doing his rounds.
Although he supports the new laws, he believes they should have gone further.
“We have a right as postmen to enter someone’s property to deliver their mail and we should have a right to deliver that mail safely."
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Dangerous dog law "should have gone further"
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72548
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Dangerous dog law "should have gone further"
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
DB1100
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 14:30
Re: Dangerous dog law "should have gone further"
I cannot see how they can take it further,if owners can now be prosecuted if we are attacked on private land,how can it go any further?,will they ban all dogs completely
For we were soldiers once,and young
-
arnold cheshire
- Posts: 5309
- Joined: 14 Oct 2010, 21:28
- Gender: Male
- Location: england
Re: Dangerous dog law "should have gone further"
posties are not trespassing so how can the law go further ?TrueBlueTerrier wrote:http://www.halsteadgazette.co.uk/news/1 ... ?ref=var_0
A Halstead postie has said that new laws on dangerous dogs have probably not gone far enough.
Changes to the Dangerous Dog Act that were announced on Friday mean that a dog owner could face prosecution if their animal attacks someone in their home or private property, unless the victim was a trespasser.
Steve McKenna, who has been a postie for 11 years, was bitten by a German shepherd dog in 2011 whilst he was doing his rounds.
Although he supports the new laws, he believes they should have gone further.
“We have a right as postmen to enter someone’s property to deliver their mail and we should have a right to deliver that mail safely."
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Re: Dangerous dog law "should have gone further"
The Halstead postie probably thinks that owning or possessing any dog should be illegal.DB1100 wrote:I cannot see how they can take it further,if owners can now be prosecuted if we are attacked on private land,how can it go any further?,will they ban all dogs completely
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72548
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: Dangerous dog law "should have gone further"
Chipping and licensing whilst it wouldn't stop attacks would certainly help in prosecuting owners, and investigating attacks and may cut down on the number of status dogs.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
datasaint
- Posts: 1541
- Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 17:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Dangerous dog law "should have gone further"
What should you do after being attacked by a dog? Take a photo of the dog? Unless there were witnesses how do you prove what happened? If there's a sign saying dog loose should you enter?
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Re: Dangerous dog law "should have gone further"
I remember dog licenses, 37½p annually after decimalisation, and the irresponsible dog owners simply didn't bother with them.TrueBlueTerrier wrote:Chipping and licensing whilst it wouldn't stop attacks would certainly help in prosecuting owners, and investigating attacks and may cut down on the number of status dogs.
-
DB1100
- Posts: 1976
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 14:30
Re: Dangerous dog law "should have gone further"
A dog bite is pretty distinctive,what with the puncture marks and bruising,the nurse or doctor treating it will recognize what it is,if there are any signs mentioning a dog loose or not you would be daft to go in,just endorse the mail accordingly and I personally would take a photo with my phone of the sign.Do not go innorm wrote:What should you do after being attacked by a dog? Take a photo of the dog? Unless there were witnesses how do you prove what happened? If there's a sign saying dog loose should you enter?
For we were soldiers once,and young