subbie wrote:And a rule 13 would be?
In any event I was questioning the logic in paying an increase to back office support staff rather than front line income earners. Undermine the front line, and the back office will loose their jobs first!
Subbie
Rule 13 Industrial Action
1. The NEC, Annual Conference, Special Conference or a properly convened Branch Meeting may in furtherance of the Union's objectives decide to authorise, endorse, call or take industrial action, including strike action. All such action must be within the law and in accordance with, and in compliance of, all statutory obligations, inclusive of ballots etc. Where a Branch decides to take action to protect immediate local interests, the General Secretary and NEC must be informed.
2. For the avoidance of doubt it is confirmed that nothing contained in these Rules empowers a Branch or any other person, committee, group or body of persons to authorise, endorse, call or take industrial action without there being a statutory ballot and compliance in all other respects with the requirements of Part V of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 as amended or replaced from time to time.
In other words, if the Fed doesn't have strike rights then you have no cards left to play
To answer your 'logic' question... The cold hard fact is it's all down to what value POL say you bring to the table.. Cut off the supply of money from CViT and what are you supposed to pay your customers with? IOU's? Wallace and Gromit stamps?
The movement and distribution of money IS the business.
The amount of times the subs round us shut 'cos they run out of money due to a delivery failure...

And that's without a strike...
Amazingly, the CWU, for once, had the foresight and focussed on this almost 8 months ago. That is why they pushed hard for many iterations of that deal to go through.
All other priorities rescinded. Simple really.
It's all a moot point anyway. If paypoint wins the benefit contract we are ALL fooked. Every man jack of us.