You asked for an alternative, I’ve given you two.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2765
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
Tman
- Posts: 4114
- Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
You seem to make a habit of this" I've already answered etc etc" type of response, but if those suggestions or "answers" are nonsensical, non-workable, non-starters, whatever, then you haven't answered anything at all.
Do you have any realistic suggestions for (what you think is an issue of) the incompatibility of SISO and job-and-knock in the same shift, or not?
Do you have any realistic suggestions for (what you think is an issue of) the incompatibility of SISO and job-and-knock in the same shift, or not?
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 11944
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
What incompatibility? It'll just eliminate something which was meant to have been eliminated years agoTman wrote: ↑27 Sep 2024, 18:58You seem to make a habit of this" I've already answered etc etc" type of response, but if those suggestions or "answers" are nonsensical, non-workable, non-starters, whatever, then you haven't answered anything at all.
Do you have any realistic suggestions for (what you think is an issue of) the incompatibility of SISO and job-and-knock in the same shift, or not?
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2765
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
What on earth is ‘job and knock in the same shift’? Is that ghosting?Tman wrote: ↑27 Sep 2024, 18:58You seem to make a habit of this" I've already answered etc etc" type of response, but if those suggestions or "answers" are nonsensical, non-workable, non-starters, whatever, then you haven't answered anything at all.
Do you have any realistic suggestions for (what you think is an issue of) the incompatibility of SISO and job-and-knock in the same shift, or not?
If you are meaning someone doing their ‘overtime’ within their contracted hours and finishing at finish time, no one should be doing that. That’s not what I’ve been talking about.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
Smoothbackground
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 20:01
- Gender: Female
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
“Job and knock in the same shift” is precisely what you are proposing! You are proposing that any “shift overtime” be for a pre-set amount for a certain quantity of work, eg, two hours, with you being able to bugger off home early, before the two hours have elapsed, if you manage to whizz round and get it done quicker. I’m new to RM and don’t know my arse from my elbow, obvs, but isn’t that ghosting?Barnacle wrote: ↑27 Sep 2024, 20:07What on earth is ‘job and knock in the same shift’? Is that ghosting?Tman wrote: ↑27 Sep 2024, 18:58You seem to make a habit of this" I've already answered etc etc" type of response, but if those suggestions or "answers" are nonsensical, non-workable, non-starters, whatever, then you haven't answered anything at all.
Do you have any realistic suggestions for (what you think is an issue of) the incompatibility of SISO and job-and-knock in the same shift, or not?
If you are meaning someone doing their ‘overtime’ within their contracted hours and finishing at finish time, no one should be doing that. That’s not what I’ve been talking about.
-
TopperGas
- Posts: 3221
- Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
I thought ghosting was doing, say, doing 1 hrs OT during the same time you are doing your own dut i.e if your duty hours are 7am to 3pm, you book 1 hours OT starting at 2pm. Job and knock is different as OT would start at 3pm and be finished by 4pm but you'd be paid until 2 hours so should finish at 4pm.Smoothbackground wrote: ↑27 Sep 2024, 20:40“Job and knock in the same shift” is precisely what you are proposing! You are proposing that any “shift overtime” be for a pre-set amount for a certain quantity of work, eg, two hours, with you being able to bugger off home early, before the two hours have elapsed, if you manage to whizz round and get it done quicker. I’m new to RM and don’t know my arse from my elbow, obvs, but isn’t that ghosting?Barnacle wrote: ↑27 Sep 2024, 20:07What on earth is ‘job and knock in the same shift’? Is that ghosting?Tman wrote: ↑27 Sep 2024, 18:58You seem to make a habit of this" I've already answered etc etc" type of response, but if those suggestions or "answers" are nonsensical, non-workable, non-starters, whatever, then you haven't answered anything at all.
Do you have any realistic suggestions for (what you think is an issue of) the incompatibility of SISO and job-and-knock in the same shift, or not?
If you are meaning someone doing their ‘overtime’ within their contracted hours and finishing at finish time, no one should be doing that. That’s not what I’ve been talking about.
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2765
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
My definition of ghosting is the same as yours > completing your OT within your regular shift.TopperGas wrote: ↑28 Sep 2024, 20:24I thought ghosting was doing, say, doing 1 hrs OT during the same time you are doing your own dut i.e if your duty hours are 7am to 3pm, you book 1 hours OT starting at 2pm. Job and knock is different as OT would start at 3pm and be finished by 4pm but you'd be paid until 2 hours so should finish at 4pm.Smoothbackground wrote: ↑27 Sep 2024, 20:40“Job and knock in the same shift” is precisely what you are proposing! You are proposing that any “shift overtime” be for a pre-set amount for a certain quantity of work, eg, two hours, with you being able to bugger off home early, before the two hours have elapsed, if you manage to whizz round and get it done quicker. I’m new to RM and don’t know my arse from my elbow, obvs, but isn’t that ghosting?Barnacle wrote: ↑27 Sep 2024, 20:07What on earth is ‘job and knock in the same shift’? Is that ghosting?Tman wrote: ↑27 Sep 2024, 18:58You seem to make a habit of this" I've already answered etc etc" type of response, but if those suggestions or "answers" are nonsensical, non-workable, non-starters, whatever, then you haven't answered anything at all.
Do you have any realistic suggestions for (what you think is an issue of) the incompatibility of SISO and job-and-knock in the same shift, or not?
If you are meaning someone doing their ‘overtime’ within their contracted hours and finishing at finish time, no one should be doing that. That’s not what I’ve been talking about.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
Tman
- Posts: 4114
- Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
I never mentioned ghosting. "Job and knock" is being offered say, two hours O/T, doing the task in one hour and going home, but still claiming the two hours.
-
Smoothbackground
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 20:01
- Gender: Female
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
I mentioned ghosting to describe the solution proposed by Barnacle. Whether ghosting is or isn’t the right label to describe it, the practice of giving a set number of hours of OT for a certain quantity of work (eg 10 tracked items delivered equating to an hour’s OT) is fraudulent as it results in the employee being paid for more hours of OT than they have performed. I do appreciate the need for there to be an incentive to undertake OT — for us on new contracts we have x1.25 pay for OT, so it balances it out quite nicely and there is already an incentive for us — but any solution needs to be above board, transparent and honestly done.
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2765
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
When someone is sent home ‘4 hours early’ of their contracted hours and the manager makes it all okay with SISO because he wants to reward a favourite or something or other, that can also be described as fraudulent.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
Jb1969
- Posts: 374
- Joined: 29 May 2014, 13:06
- Gender: Male
-
Smoothbackground
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 20:01
- Gender: Female
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
No, fraudulent is where something is done with an intention to deceive, eg, perhaps telling me to leave early but not to clock out so the paperwork doesn’t show a discrepancy. That isn’t what occurred. I clocked out when leaving early. The manager was well within the bounds of his managerial discretion and delegated decision-making authority to allow me to go early — it happens every day when people feign toothache, gut ache, hangover, etc, and then leave work early and still get paid in full. The manager was perfectly entitled to allow me to leave early as a one-off/rare occurrence by way of a reward for being so helpful during the summer leave period. It is called incentivising your staff. Good managers like our DOM know how to use a bit of carrot and stick.
-
Tman
- Posts: 4114
- Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
There must be a million reasons why someone goes before the end of their shift and it's not fraudulent, but claiming money (by saying you've been working when you know you haven't) can have no excuses or reasons.
Fraud, pure and simple, and many have been sacked for it over the years.
Fraud, pure and simple, and many have been sacked for it over the years.
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2765
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
Smoothbackground wrote: ↑29 Sep 2024, 17:07No, fraudulent is where something is done with an intention to deceive, eg, perhaps telling me to leave early but not to clock out so the paperwork doesn’t show a discrepancy. That isn’t what occurred. I clocked out when leaving early. The manager was well within the bounds of his managerial discretion and delegated decision-making authority to allow me to go early — it happens every day when people feign toothache, gut ache, hangover, etc, and then leave work early and still get paid in full. The manager was perfectly entitled to allow me to leave early as a one-off/rare occurrence by way of a reward for being so helpful during the summer leave period. It is called incentivising your staff. Good managers like our DOM know how to use a bit of carrot and stick.
The manager allowed you to ghost four hours.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
Smoothbackground
- Posts: 1263
- Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 20:01
- Gender: Female
Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)
He did no such thing. You’re just jealous anywayBarnacle wrote: ↑29 Sep 2024, 17:29Smoothbackground wrote: ↑29 Sep 2024, 17:07No, fraudulent is where something is done with an intention to deceive, eg, perhaps telling me to leave early but not to clock out so the paperwork doesn’t show a discrepancy. That isn’t what occurred. I clocked out when leaving early. The manager was well within the bounds of his managerial discretion and delegated decision-making authority to allow me to go early — it happens every day when people feign toothache, gut ache, hangover, etc, and then leave work early and still get paid in full. The manager was perfectly entitled to allow me to leave early as a one-off/rare occurrence by way of a reward for being so helpful during the summer leave period. It is called incentivising your staff. Good managers like our DOM know how to use a bit of carrot and stick.
The manager allowed you to ghost four hours.