ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
Barnacle
Posts: 2765
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by Barnacle »

Tman wrote:
27 Sep 2024, 15:49
So Piece work or Price work then?
That's sure to go down well with the vast majority of the CWU and it's members.
You asked for an alternative, I’ve given you two.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
Tman
Posts: 4114
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by Tman »

You seem to make a habit of this" I've already answered etc etc" type of response, but if those suggestions or "answers" are nonsensical, non-workable, non-starters, whatever, then you haven't answered anything at all.
Do you have any realistic suggestions for (what you think is an issue of) the incompatibility of SISO and job-and-knock in the same shift, or not?
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 11944
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by SpacePhoenix »

Tman wrote:
27 Sep 2024, 18:58
You seem to make a habit of this" I've already answered etc etc" type of response, but if those suggestions or "answers" are nonsensical, non-workable, non-starters, whatever, then you haven't answered anything at all.
Do you have any realistic suggestions for (what you think is an issue of) the incompatibility of SISO and job-and-knock in the same shift, or not?
What incompatibility? It'll just eliminate something which was meant to have been eliminated years ago
Barnacle
Posts: 2765
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by Barnacle »

Tman wrote:
27 Sep 2024, 18:58
You seem to make a habit of this" I've already answered etc etc" type of response, but if those suggestions or "answers" are nonsensical, non-workable, non-starters, whatever, then you haven't answered anything at all.
Do you have any realistic suggestions for (what you think is an issue of) the incompatibility of SISO and job-and-knock in the same shift, or not?
What on earth is ‘job and knock in the same shift’? Is that ghosting?

If you are meaning someone doing their ‘overtime’ within their contracted hours and finishing at finish time, no one should be doing that. That’s not what I’ve been talking about.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
Smoothbackground
Posts: 1263
Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 20:01
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by Smoothbackground »

Barnacle wrote:
27 Sep 2024, 20:07
Tman wrote:
27 Sep 2024, 18:58
You seem to make a habit of this" I've already answered etc etc" type of response, but if those suggestions or "answers" are nonsensical, non-workable, non-starters, whatever, then you haven't answered anything at all.
Do you have any realistic suggestions for (what you think is an issue of) the incompatibility of SISO and job-and-knock in the same shift, or not?
What on earth is ‘job and knock in the same shift’? Is that ghosting?

If you are meaning someone doing their ‘overtime’ within their contracted hours and finishing at finish time, no one should be doing that. That’s not what I’ve been talking about.
“Job and knock in the same shift” is precisely what you are proposing! You are proposing that any “shift overtime” be for a pre-set amount for a certain quantity of work, eg, two hours, with you being able to bugger off home early, before the two hours have elapsed, if you manage to whizz round and get it done quicker. I’m new to RM and don’t know my arse from my elbow, obvs, but isn’t that ghosting?
TopperGas
Posts: 3221
Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by TopperGas »

Smoothbackground wrote:
27 Sep 2024, 20:40
Barnacle wrote:
27 Sep 2024, 20:07
Tman wrote:
27 Sep 2024, 18:58
You seem to make a habit of this" I've already answered etc etc" type of response, but if those suggestions or "answers" are nonsensical, non-workable, non-starters, whatever, then you haven't answered anything at all.
Do you have any realistic suggestions for (what you think is an issue of) the incompatibility of SISO and job-and-knock in the same shift, or not?
What on earth is ‘job and knock in the same shift’? Is that ghosting?

If you are meaning someone doing their ‘overtime’ within their contracted hours and finishing at finish time, no one should be doing that. That’s not what I’ve been talking about.
“Job and knock in the same shift” is precisely what you are proposing! You are proposing that any “shift overtime” be for a pre-set amount for a certain quantity of work, eg, two hours, with you being able to bugger off home early, before the two hours have elapsed, if you manage to whizz round and get it done quicker. I’m new to RM and don’t know my arse from my elbow, obvs, but isn’t that ghosting?
I thought ghosting was doing, say, doing 1 hrs OT during the same time you are doing your own dut i.e if your duty hours are 7am to 3pm, you book 1 hours OT starting at 2pm. Job and knock is different as OT would start at 3pm and be finished by 4pm but you'd be paid until 2 hours so should finish at 4pm.
Barnacle
Posts: 2765
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by Barnacle »

TopperGas wrote:
28 Sep 2024, 20:24
Smoothbackground wrote:
27 Sep 2024, 20:40
Barnacle wrote:
27 Sep 2024, 20:07
Tman wrote:
27 Sep 2024, 18:58
You seem to make a habit of this" I've already answered etc etc" type of response, but if those suggestions or "answers" are nonsensical, non-workable, non-starters, whatever, then you haven't answered anything at all.
Do you have any realistic suggestions for (what you think is an issue of) the incompatibility of SISO and job-and-knock in the same shift, or not?
What on earth is ‘job and knock in the same shift’? Is that ghosting?

If you are meaning someone doing their ‘overtime’ within their contracted hours and finishing at finish time, no one should be doing that. That’s not what I’ve been talking about.
“Job and knock in the same shift” is precisely what you are proposing! You are proposing that any “shift overtime” be for a pre-set amount for a certain quantity of work, eg, two hours, with you being able to bugger off home early, before the two hours have elapsed, if you manage to whizz round and get it done quicker. I’m new to RM and don’t know my arse from my elbow, obvs, but isn’t that ghosting?
I thought ghosting was doing, say, doing 1 hrs OT during the same time you are doing your own dut i.e if your duty hours are 7am to 3pm, you book 1 hours OT starting at 2pm. Job and knock is different as OT would start at 3pm and be finished by 4pm but you'd be paid until 2 hours so should finish at 4pm.
My definition of ghosting is the same as yours > completing your OT within your regular shift.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
Tman
Posts: 4114
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by Tman »

I never mentioned ghosting. "Job and knock" is being offered say, two hours O/T, doing the task in one hour and going home, but still claiming the two hours.
Smoothbackground
Posts: 1263
Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 20:01
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by Smoothbackground »

I mentioned ghosting to describe the solution proposed by Barnacle. Whether ghosting is or isn’t the right label to describe it, the practice of giving a set number of hours of OT for a certain quantity of work (eg 10 tracked items delivered equating to an hour’s OT) is fraudulent as it results in the employee being paid for more hours of OT than they have performed. I do appreciate the need for there to be an incentive to undertake OT — for us on new contracts we have x1.25 pay for OT, so it balances it out quite nicely and there is already an incentive for us — but any solution needs to be above board, transparent and honestly done.
Barnacle
Posts: 2765
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by Barnacle »

When someone is sent home ‘4 hours early’ of their contracted hours and the manager makes it all okay with SISO because he wants to reward a favourite or something or other, that can also be described as fraudulent.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
Jb1969
Posts: 374
Joined: 29 May 2014, 13:06
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by Jb1969 »

Barnacle wrote:
29 Sep 2024, 07:44
When someone is sent home ‘4 hours early’ of their contracted hours and the manager makes it all okay with SISO because he wants to reward a favourite or something or other, that can also be described as fraudulent.
No, that’s ghosting!😂
Smoothbackground
Posts: 1263
Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 20:01
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by Smoothbackground »

Barnacle wrote:
29 Sep 2024, 07:44
When someone is sent home ‘4 hours early’ of their contracted hours and the manager makes it all okay with SISO because he wants to reward a favourite or something or other, that can also be described as fraudulent.
No, fraudulent is where something is done with an intention to deceive, eg, perhaps telling me to leave early but not to clock out so the paperwork doesn’t show a discrepancy. That isn’t what occurred. I clocked out when leaving early. The manager was well within the bounds of his managerial discretion and delegated decision-making authority to allow me to go early — it happens every day when people feign toothache, gut ache, hangover, etc, and then leave work early and still get paid in full. The manager was perfectly entitled to allow me to leave early as a one-off/rare occurrence by way of a reward for being so helpful during the summer leave period. It is called incentivising your staff. Good managers like our DOM know how to use a bit of carrot and stick.
Tman
Posts: 4114
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by Tman »

There must be a million reasons why someone goes before the end of their shift and it's not fraudulent, but claiming money (by saying you've been working when you know you haven't) can have no excuses or reasons.
Fraud, pure and simple, and many have been sacked for it over the years.
Barnacle
Posts: 2765
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by Barnacle »

Smoothbackground wrote:
29 Sep 2024, 17:07
Barnacle wrote:
29 Sep 2024, 07:44
When someone is sent home ‘4 hours early’ of their contracted hours and the manager makes it all okay with SISO because he wants to reward a favourite or something or other, that can also be described as fraudulent.
No, fraudulent is where something is done with an intention to deceive, eg, perhaps telling me to leave early but not to clock out so the paperwork doesn’t show a discrepancy. That isn’t what occurred. I clocked out when leaving early. The manager was well within the bounds of his managerial discretion and delegated decision-making authority to allow me to go early — it happens every day when people feign toothache, gut ache, hangover, etc, and then leave work early and still get paid in full. The manager was perfectly entitled to allow me to leave early as a one-off/rare occurrence by way of a reward for being so helpful during the summer leave period. It is called incentivising your staff. Good managers like our DOM know how to use a bit of carrot and stick.

The manager allowed you to ghost four hours.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
Smoothbackground
Posts: 1263
Joined: 21 Sep 2023, 20:01
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 312/24 – SISO Overtime Management – Business Recovery, Transformation & Growth Agreement (Appendix 5 – Data Use and Performance Management)

Post by Smoothbackground »

Barnacle wrote:
29 Sep 2024, 17:29
Smoothbackground wrote:
29 Sep 2024, 17:07
Barnacle wrote:
29 Sep 2024, 07:44
When someone is sent home ‘4 hours early’ of their contracted hours and the manager makes it all okay with SISO because he wants to reward a favourite or something or other, that can also be described as fraudulent.
No, fraudulent is where something is done with an intention to deceive, eg, perhaps telling me to leave early but not to clock out so the paperwork doesn’t show a discrepancy. That isn’t what occurred. I clocked out when leaving early. The manager was well within the bounds of his managerial discretion and delegated decision-making authority to allow me to go early — it happens every day when people feign toothache, gut ache, hangover, etc, and then leave work early and still get paid in full. The manager was perfectly entitled to allow me to leave early as a one-off/rare occurrence by way of a reward for being so helpful during the summer leave period. It is called incentivising your staff. Good managers like our DOM know how to use a bit of carrot and stick.

The manager allowed you to ghost four hours.
He did no such thing. You’re just jealous anyway :dance