https://www.thenational.scot/business/2 ... -happened/
I WONDER if any of your readers have any experience of Royal Mail. I posted a small package, in good faith, first class, and with all the additional trappings of “track and trace” and “signed for” (which used to be completely unnecessary, as first class guaranteed next-day delivery.)
The total cost of this was £6.45, a lot, considering that the envelope was small, containing only a CD and a card and was, in any case, only going to Richmond, London.
This was posted on May 28, with next-day delivery being assured. However, as I write on June 6, the package has still not arrived. My “track and trace” told me delivery had been attempted but refused by the recipients, so the parcel would be returned to me.
I was astonished at this, as it had been previously agreed with the recipients (a classical music group) that the CD would arrive, and be gratefully received. I contacted them and they assured me that no attempt to deliver had ever been made and that therefore nobody had refused delivery!
Subsequent to this I have attempted to contact Royal Mail on three occasions (by telephone, which requires a 45-minute wait, on average, in order to speak with an operative) and established that the package appears to be languishing somewhere in the sorting office in Richmond.
I have been at pains to establish that I do not want it returned to me, but to actually be delivered!
Hopefully, this message has now sunk in, but the frustration, exasperation, and anger still remain. Royal Mail, like so many other British institutions, used to be an international byword for excellence and reliability.
Now they are a joke. What went wrong? It just might be privatisation ...
Brian D York
via email
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72644
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
Jb1969
- Posts: 386
- Joined: 29 May 2014, 13:06
- Gender: Male
Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?
You, meaning the public wanted this.You were assured a privatised company would perform far better & it would not go in same direction as Water, Electricity etc.
The work force were proud to supply that service, but that’s been beaten out of us with impossible delivery duties & no staff.
It’s gonna get worse too!
The work force were proud to supply that service, but that’s been beaten out of us with impossible delivery duties & no staff.
It’s gonna get worse too!
-
ted_e_bear
- Posts: 4066
- Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
- Gender: Male
Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?
Jb1969 wrote: ↑11 Jun 2024, 22:08You, meaning the public wanted this.You were assured a privatised company would perform far better & it would not go in same direction as Water, Electricity etc.
The work force were proud to supply that service, but that’s been beaten out of us with impossible delivery duties & no staff.
It’s gonna get worse too!
Good reply, especially regarding the workforce, ah the good old days when it was a big thing if you forgot an odd letter or two, oh how times have changed.
-
postslippete
- Posts: 4188
- Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?
If the parcel was "refused" then the postie would have to endorse it with a red sticker and if it had a return address it would normally be returned to the recipient. Whether the postie has done this or not it is likely to be sat in a dead letter tray somewhere in the office OR its been incorrectly sent to where all the letters/parcels that don't have a return address get sent to.
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
-
TopperGas
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?
If it was sent Tracked and seems to be lost somewhere in the system then why doesn't the letter writer just get on and claim compensation, not really sure what they hope to gain by writing to the press as they are not going to assist in finding it if it is lost.
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12127
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?
If it's an RTS item, it's probably stuck in a box of RTS items, either at the MC or DO. RTS items are low priority as they're "dead mail"
-
norris9
- Posts: 2675
- Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 17:32
- Gender: Female
Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?
Some idiots turned Royal Mail into a loss making company and then decided to try to 'fix' the losses by massively reducing the staff numbers, which inevitably meant that the service went to absolute crap.
-
Sean06
- Posts: 2448
- Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
- Gender: Male
Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?
But what about the live mail stuck amongst this dead mail surely they are a priority.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑16 Jun 2024, 20:22If it's an RTS item, it's probably stuck in a box of RTS items, either at the MC or DO. RTS items are low priority as they're "dead mail"
-
LouBarlow
- Posts: 4709
- Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56
Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?
Royal Mail has more often been a loss-making company than it has been a profitable one. The difference is, it now has shareholders to answer to.
-
postslippete
- Posts: 4188
- Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?
If it hasn't been profitable in the past it is because our profits have been invested elsewhere. Before Royal Mail was privatised it reported a pre-tax £324 million profit that was up from £201 million a year earlier. But the biggest concern back then though was the historic pension deficit.
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12127
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?
The RTS mail can be sat around for days until there's the time to do itSean06 wrote: ↑17 Jun 2024, 22:23But what about the live mail stuck amongst this dead mail surely they are a priority.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑16 Jun 2024, 20:22If it's an RTS item, it's probably stuck in a box of RTS items, either at the MC or DO. RTS items are low priority as they're "dead mail"