ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72644
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

https://www.thenational.scot/business/2 ... -happened/

I WONDER if any of your readers have any experience of Royal Mail. I posted a small package, in good faith, first class, and with all the additional trappings of “track and trace” and “signed for” (which used to be completely unnecessary, as first class guaranteed next-day delivery.)

The total cost of this was £6.45, a lot, considering that the envelope was small, containing only a CD and a card and was, in any case, only going to Richmond, London.

This was posted on May 28, with next-day delivery being assured. However, as I write on June 6, the package has still not arrived. My “track and trace” told me delivery had been attempted but refused by the recipients, so the parcel would be returned to me.

I was astonished at this, as it had been previously agreed with the recipients (a classical music group) that the CD would arrive, and be gratefully received. I contacted them and they assured me that no attempt to deliver had ever been made and that therefore nobody had refused delivery!

Subsequent to this I have attempted to contact Royal Mail on three occasions (by telephone, which requires a 45-minute wait, on average, in order to speak with an operative) and established that the package appears to be languishing somewhere in the sorting office in Richmond.

I have been at pains to establish that I do not want it returned to me, but to actually be delivered!

Hopefully, this message has now sunk in, but the frustration, exasperation, and anger still remain. Royal Mail, like so many other British institutions, used to be an international byword for excellence and reliability.

Now they are a joke. What went wrong? It just might be privatisation ...

Brian D York
via email
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Jb1969
Posts: 386
Joined: 29 May 2014, 13:06
Gender: Male

Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?

Post by Jb1969 »

You, meaning the public wanted this.You were assured a privatised company would perform far better & it would not go in same direction as Water, Electricity etc.
The work force were proud to supply that service, but that’s been beaten out of us with impossible delivery duties & no staff.
It’s gonna get worse too!
ted_e_bear
Posts: 4066
Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?

Post by ted_e_bear »

Jb1969 wrote:
11 Jun 2024, 22:08
You, meaning the public wanted this.You were assured a privatised company would perform far better & it would not go in same direction as Water, Electricity etc.
The work force were proud to supply that service, but that’s been beaten out of us with impossible delivery duties & no staff.
It’s gonna get worse too!
:Applause :Applause

Good reply, especially regarding the workforce, ah the good old days when it was a big thing if you forgot an odd letter or two, oh how times have changed.
postslippete
Posts: 4188
Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
Gender: Male

Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?

Post by postslippete »

If the parcel was "refused" then the postie would have to endorse it with a red sticker and if it had a return address it would normally be returned to the recipient. Whether the postie has done this or not it is likely to be sat in a dead letter tray somewhere in the office OR its been incorrectly sent to where all the letters/parcels that don't have a return address get sent to.
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
TopperGas
Posts: 3448
Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
Gender: Male

Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?

Post by TopperGas »

If it was sent Tracked and seems to be lost somewhere in the system then why doesn't the letter writer just get on and claim compensation, not really sure what they hope to gain by writing to the press as they are not going to assist in finding it if it is lost.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12127
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?

Post by SpacePhoenix »

If it's an RTS item, it's probably stuck in a box of RTS items, either at the MC or DO. RTS items are low priority as they're "dead mail"
norris9
Posts: 2675
Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 17:32
Gender: Female

Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?

Post by norris9 »

Some idiots turned Royal Mail into a loss making company and then decided to try to 'fix' the losses by massively reducing the staff numbers, which inevitably meant that the service went to absolute crap.
Sean06
Posts: 2448
Joined: 20 Nov 2023, 16:50
Gender: Male

Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?

Post by Sean06 »

SpacePhoenix wrote:
16 Jun 2024, 20:22
If it's an RTS item, it's probably stuck in a box of RTS items, either at the MC or DO. RTS items are low priority as they're "dead mail"
But what about the live mail stuck amongst this dead mail surely they are a priority.
LouBarlow
Posts: 4709
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56

Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?

Post by LouBarlow »

norris9 wrote:
17 Jun 2024, 21:03
Some idiots turned Royal Mail into a loss making company and then decided to try to 'fix' the losses by massively reducing the staff numbers, which inevitably meant that the service went to absolute crap.
Royal Mail has more often been a loss-making company than it has been a profitable one. The difference is, it now has shareholders to answer to.
postslippete
Posts: 4188
Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
Gender: Male

Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?

Post by postslippete »

LouBarlow wrote:
18 Jun 2024, 05:56

Royal Mail has more often been a loss-making company than it has been a profitable one. The difference is, it now has shareholders to answer to.

If it hasn't been profitable in the past it is because our profits have been invested elsewhere. Before Royal Mail was privatised it reported a pre-tax £324 million profit that was up from £201 million a year earlier. But the biggest concern back then though was the historic pension deficit.
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12127
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: Letter: Royal Mail used to be a byword for reliability - what has happened?

Post by SpacePhoenix »

Sean06 wrote:
17 Jun 2024, 22:23
SpacePhoenix wrote:
16 Jun 2024, 20:22
If it's an RTS item, it's probably stuck in a box of RTS items, either at the MC or DO. RTS items are low priority as they're "dead mail"
But what about the live mail stuck amongst this dead mail surely they are a priority.
The RTS mail can be sat around for days until there's the time to do it