ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

It's Monday

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: It's Monday

Post by aiden01 »

CRIBMAD wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 22:01
Terry Pullinger is back seemingly , hes been in the talks
Source??are just usual ballix?
scoobydo79
Posts: 2044
Joined: 15 May 2011, 19:04
Gender: Male

Re: It's Monday

Post by scoobydo79 »

CRIBMAD wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 22:01
Terry Pullinger is back seemingly , hes been in the talks
Says Who???🤔
oypostie
Posts: 911
Joined: 25 Dec 2007, 13:39

Re: It's Monday

Post by oypostie »

Shergar was also spotted at the talks :whistle :whistle
cobrakai
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 320
Joined: 13 Dec 2007, 17:17

Re: It's Monday

Post by cobrakai »

oypostie wrote:
28 Feb 2023, 12:31
Shergar was also spotted at the talks :whistle :whistle
Lord Lucan took him in his horsebox. That’s what I heard anyway, it’s time people realised 99 percent of stuff said at work/workplace/here is total utter guff. The dispute has probably wrecked Royal Mails staff morale for good.
weary_posty
Posts: 225
Joined: 01 Jul 2011, 15:08
Gender: Male

Re: It's Monday

Post by weary_posty »

Haven’t gone through this entire thread but my feeling is that if the deadline has been passed with no resolution then the PEC meeting is for nothing more than to discuss strike dates.

With absurd revisions going live in the coming weeks you’d think maximum disruption to them is one of the last tools left in the CWU’s arsenal
Beanyjazz
Posts: 213
Joined: 12 Dec 2014, 19:59
Gender: Male

Re: It's Monday

Post by Beanyjazz »

Maybe they've timed these revisions going live so when they do fail (which it's clearly obvious they are going to) the RM cronies can blame it on the strikes again.

Might be worth letting the revisions fail for a few weeks then striking.
scoobydo79
Posts: 2044
Joined: 15 May 2011, 19:04
Gender: Male

Re: It's Monday

Post by scoobydo79 »

Beanyjazz wrote:
28 Feb 2023, 13:34
Maybe they've timed these revisions going live so when they do fail (which it's clearly obvious they are going to) the RM cronies can blame it on the strikes again.

Might be worth letting the revisions fail for a few weeks then striking.
A very good point :hmmmm
freespeech
MDEC
Posts: 762
Joined: 28 Jun 2007, 16:35

Re: It's Monday

Post by freespeech »

Cedar_Room wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 19:11
clashcityrocker wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 18:58
wandle wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 18:52
If the CWU are now negotiating with the board, he is irrelevant, surely?
At the start of these negotiations much was made of the fact ST wasn't present at the negotiations.
Now he isn't at the negotiations this is being hailed as some sort of victory?
Because he’s been booted out of the talks. At the start he was choosing not to attend as some sort of misguided snub to the union & workforce.

It’s a completely different scenario
Misguided snub? It's extremely rare and very unusual for a CEO to be involved in pay negotiations.
freespeech
MDEC
Posts: 762
Joined: 28 Jun 2007, 16:35

Re: It's Monday

Post by freespeech »

Cedar_Room wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 19:11
clashcityrocker wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 18:58
wandle wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 18:52
If the CWU are now negotiating with the board, he is irrelevant, surely?
At the start of these negotiations much was made of the fact ST wasn't present at the negotiations.
Now he isn't at the negotiations this is being hailed as some sort of victory?
Because he’s been booted out of the talks. At the start he was choosing not to attend as some sort of misguided snub to the union & workforce.

It’s a completely different scenario
Misguided snub? It's extremely rare and very unusual for a CEO to be involved in pay negotiations.
Cedar_Room
Posts: 826
Joined: 31 Aug 2007, 14:09

Re: It's Monday

Post by Cedar_Room »

freespeech wrote:
28 Feb 2023, 16:21
Cedar_Room wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 19:11
clashcityrocker wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 18:58
wandle wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 18:52
If the CWU are now negotiating with the board, he is irrelevant, surely?
At the start of these negotiations much was made of the fact ST wasn't present at the negotiations.
Now he isn't at the negotiations this is being hailed as some sort of victory?
Because he’s been booted out of the talks. At the start he was choosing not to attend as some sort of misguided snub to the union & workforce.

It’s a completely different scenario
Misguided snub? It's extremely rare and very unusual for a CEO to be involved in pay negotiations.
Not the impression that Thompson gave. He was always waxing lyrical about how HE wanted to get round the table & negotiate. He was also partial to filming himself outside wherever the meetings were taking place (when he did show up) to spout his drivel.

The CWU had stated throughout the dispute that his attendance at the negotiations has been,at best,hit & miss.

I doubt they’d do this if he wasn’t expected to attend?
“Shorts,in this weather?!”

“If they’re bills I don’t want ‘em!”

“What’s she been ordering now?”
sixfoottwo
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 569
Joined: 11 May 2017, 15:15
Gender: Male

Re: It's Monday

Post by sixfoottwo »

The silence is deafening yet we continue to be attacked just not good enough.
freespeech
MDEC
Posts: 762
Joined: 28 Jun 2007, 16:35

Re: It's Monday

Post by freespeech »

Cedar_Room wrote:
28 Feb 2023, 18:29
freespeech wrote:
28 Feb 2023, 16:21
Cedar_Room wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 19:11
clashcityrocker wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 18:58
wandle wrote:
27 Feb 2023, 18:52
If the CWU are now negotiating with the board, he is irrelevant, surely?
At the start of these negotiations much was made of the fact ST wasn't present at the negotiations.
Now he isn't at the negotiations this is being hailed as some sort of victory?
Because he’s been booted out of the talks. At the start he was choosing not to attend as some sort of misguided snub to the union & workforce.

It’s a completely different scenario
Misguided snub? It's extremely rare and very unusual for a CEO to be involved in pay negotiations.
Not the impression that Thompson gave. He was always waxing lyrical about how HE wanted to get round the table & negotiate. He was also partial to filming himself outside wherever the meetings were taking place (when he did show up) to spout his drivel.

The CWU had stated throughout the dispute that his attendance at the negotiations has been,at best,hit & miss.

I doubt they’d do this if he wasn’t expected to attend?
It's exactly what the CWU did....they were moaning for weeks that ST wasn't involved.
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: It's Monday

Post by Woody Guthrie »

Talks continue with the business. The Postal Executive is meeting now. Field Officers call planned for this evening has been postponed now on stand by for a briefing call tomorrow.
(Don’t shoot the messenger)
Only dead fish follow the current
CRIBMAD
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 835
Joined: 11 Oct 2016, 13:38
Gender: Male

Re: It's Monday

Post by CRIBMAD »

Agency staff have been asked today at our place if they want to go full time with RM but have to work Sundays ,somethings afoot !
LouBarlow
Posts: 4709
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56

Re: It's Monday

Post by LouBarlow »

CRIBMAD wrote:
28 Feb 2023, 19:28
Agency staff have been asked today at our place if they want to go full time with RM but have to work Sundays ,somethings afoot !
The end of the threat of mandatory Sundays for existing staff is such a massive open goal, I’d be amazed as the union don’t get that as part of the new ‘deal of the century’ that is no doubt incoming. You don’t need a full office to cope with packet traffic on a sunday.