Yes they are.Barnacle wrote: ↑29 Jan 2023, 16:40So by stating that the strikes have cost them £200m, are they saying that they spent the £175.5m cost saving on wages, plus another £200m on agency staff etc.?? £375.5m?funkflex55 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2023, 15:18100,000 employees on strike?
7.5 hours x £13 = £97.50
Times by 100k = £9.75 million
Time by 18 days £175.5 million
Are they that incompetent?
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Anyone wanna take a guess?
-
kazardaimenu
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: 13 Apr 2022, 19:11
- Gender: Male
Re: Anyone wanna take a guess?
-
walthmstowman
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 25 Sep 2022, 15:17
- Gender: Male
Re: Anyone wanna take a guess?
Yes, you know they are .Barnacle wrote: ↑29 Jan 2023, 16:40So by stating that the strikes have cost them £200m, are they saying that they spent the £175.5m cost saving on wages, plus another £200m on agency staff etc.?? £375.5m?funkflex55 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2023, 15:18100,000 employees on strike?
7.5 hours x £13 = £97.50
Times by 100k = £9.75 million
Time by 18 days £175.5 million
Are they that incompetent?
-
curleigh
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 25 Oct 2022, 20:55
- Gender: Male
Re: Anyone wanna take a guess?
They like to shove the millions lost to strike, how DO they lose money when we're on strike, its not like the customers buy things from us, as stated earlier why dontbthey make it transparent where these losses are generated and offset it against wages savedkazardaimenu wrote: ↑29 Jan 2023, 16:42Yes they are.Barnacle wrote: ↑29 Jan 2023, 16:40So by stating that the strikes have cost them £200m, are they saying that they spent the £175.5m cost saving on wages, plus another £200m on agency staff etc.?? £375.5m?funkflex55 wrote: ↑29 Jan 2023, 15:18100,000 employees on strike?
7.5 hours x £13 = £97.50
Times by 100k = £9.75 million
Time by 18 days £175.5 million
Are they that incompetent?