ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

CWU conference: The political fund

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72545
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

CWU conference: The political fund

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=18140" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Dennis Kilgariff from Oxford moved a motion calling on the union to withdraw support from MPs who have not backed the union’s Early Day Motion against privatisation.

He said, “Fifteen years ago this union fought to defeat the Tory government’s attempts to privatise Royal Mail.

“Who would have thought that today we’d be fighting over the same issue, but this time our opponent would be a Labour government?”

Labour activist Marion Brain from Birmingham said, “If the government is going to turn things around they’ve got to start delivering for working class people.”

General secretary Billy Hayes opposed the motion. He said, “We’ve got a policy that’s not just about holding individual MPs to account – it’s about the whole government.

“If they are foolish enough to proceed with privatisation we will ballot the membership on whether we will support Labour at the next general election.” Oxford’s motion was defeated in a vote.

© Socialist Worker (unless otherwise stated). You may republish if you include an active link to the original.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Sandyman
Posts: 252
Joined: 21 Sep 2007, 21:09
Gender: Male
Location: Hell in a handcart

Re: CWU conference: The political fund

Post by Sandyman »

“If they are foolish enough to proceed with privatisation we will ballot the membership on whether we will support Labour at the next general election.”
This from a man who publically announced he wants a fourth term of Labour government? :crazy:

You wouldn't dare jepoardize the chance of a seat in Liverpool, Billy.

Tell you what, instead of a mailshot asking the members to sign up to a CWU credit card, how about a mailshot asking the members if they want to support Labour after the way we've been dumped on by the government?
Spanish practices - Que?
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: CWU conference: The political fund

Post by Big Daz »

Sandyman wrote:
“If they are foolish enough to proceed with privatisation we will ballot the membership on whether we will support Labour at the next general election.”
This from a man who publically announced he wants a fourth term of Labour government? :crazy:

You wouldn't dare jepoardize the chance of a seat in Liverpool, Billy.

Tell you what, instead of a mailshot asking the members to sign up to a CWU credit card, how about a mailshot asking the members if they want to support Labour after the way we've been dumped on by the government?

:Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause
eian687
Posts: 743
Joined: 27 May 2007, 09:43
Location: south wales

Re: CWU conference: The political fund

Post by eian687 »

seems daft we are pay the labour party to privatise us :crazy: and using union subs to fight against it :crazy: