Martin Walsh wrote: ↑04 Jun 2023, 06:35
Enskied if I was still on deliveries and I knew what I did in terms of both the companies finances and their change agenda then yes I would still have agreed the negotiators agreement.
It does make me chuckle at times , us on the postal executive have seen warts and all the real threat to Royal Mail future and what the company was legally obligated to do to avoid administration.
Yet some on here are now economists and claim it is all lies or the government would save us.
Well your anonymous on this site along with many others who if your wrong who blames you if 30 thousand jobs went or individuals did not get regularly paid.?
Then you have the others who should we let the company go to the wall as it is not our fault with the claim I rather die on my feet then accept the deal. Again they are anonymous and not responsible for 114 thousand members jobs.
Now what do you think will change from voting no ?
1. Do you think Royal Mail are going to continue to fly planes so ghee would be no later starts ? if you do then how you going to make a company who knows the growth in parcels is later and offering a greener option. We have done as much as we can to achieve up to 60 minutes option which we have 4 months to improve on and there will be an exemptions process as well. Start and finish times will come out if a joint statement is reached to resolve 2.5.
2. Our members deserve more pay but the company has declared a loss of over 400 million there was simply no more money to be had.
3. On seasonal variations, Royal Mail wanted no finishing times linked to Siso. Royal Mail have 3 senior directors who come from Land Rover jaguar and wanted annualised hours and productivity normally drops in the summer as traffic dips and yet we have the same number of walks. This has resulted in high levels of absorption.
Seasonal variations is aimed at reducing absorption and the period will run from September 203 to September 2024. All hours will balance over this period. Hours have never balanced over a tax year in fact prior to the way forward we had 2 separate annual leave periods summer and winter.
4. The 30 minute flex option is subject to review but it will not mean anyone will have to flex every day , the current agreement which is not used now is voluntary and with seasonal variations we don’t see that changing.
5. On new entrants, the vast majority of our members did not want to be forced to work Sundays or move later to cover dedicated parcel routes. Once we achieved this in negotiations Royal Mail were always going to introduce a separate workforce to pick up this growth in traffic.
6. The agreement has stopped Royal Mail setting up a separate parcel company and introducing owner drivers on the core deliveries both were priorities of the company’ at the start of the dispute.
7. I do not think that Delivery staff truly understand the significance of the Midland Hub opening up next month and what will have over the next few months. Apart from some rural routes all your large parcels will at some stage not arrive in your Delivery unit. All of a sudden a delivery unit has is letters , flats , d2d , tracked , PS and smaller format 1&2 parcels.
This is why Royal Mail want delivery method changes ,this is why the union wants commitments on no compulsory redundancies and to try and attract our members though better attendance to pick up Dedicated parcel routes and Sundays or we giving the growth to new recruits and owner drivers.
8. No one wanted to see the attendance changes in any agreement but the company were going to impose the changes to the trigger points and give 90 days legal notice on SSP And Ill health retirement. We decided to move modify those changes.
9. The company did not want the independent review into cases and now those members and reps have got the best opportunity to get justice.
So yes I would. This is the best deal in the circumstances we faced , it is not a perfect deal.
Do you really think that it did not cross our minds to be popular to announce more strike action because we knew elements of these agreement would not go down well.
However we would have been playing Russian roulette with yours and all of our members jobs and terms and conditions.
Lots of my mates think I am mad to keep posting on this site or other social media as it is easy for some to call me names and make snide remarks or assumptions which are completely unfounded.
However I have posted on this site for 16 years and I will be bullied or stopped from giving my view and opinion even when most will not even read it before commenting.