This^^^^^einastronaut wrote: ↑20 Aug 2022, 15:07It's not about who might be offended. It's us who ought to be offended. It's a matter of professionalism and image. It looks, at least to me, like children squabbling. It's adults resorting to mud-slinging, name calling and childish mockery while also at least nominally claiming to represent over 100,000 others in a professional capacity. Those who are being represented may not wish to have their voice debased in that way.pinstripe wrote: ↑20 Aug 2022, 06:21I’m sure that the public will see far worse on their own social media. The only ones likely to be offended have already made their views known on the Daily Mail, Telegraph, The Express and The Suneinastronaut wrote: ↑19 Aug 2022, 22:56I've seen posters they've put up in our office, some in view of the public, saying nothing but the words: "They're taking the piss!"
I expect our union officials to be professional. If some idiot employed by the union is allowed to post stuff like this without being disciplined for doing so then how are we supposed to have faith that the negotiations are actually being handled in a professional manner.