ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Spending Review: Millions face cut in value of workplace pensions - Sound scarier than it looks

Royal Mail pension news and discussion.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
stephen500
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1458
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 04:04

Spending Review: Millions face cut in value of workplace pensions - Sound scarier than it looks

Post by stephen500 »

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-55070292
Perhaps Robert T would be kind enough to review this news story.
I think on payment of pension, my payment increases are now linked to CPI (section B)
Personally I can't see much difference between CPI and this new measure of inflation to be used for increases after 2030.
But as usual, it looks like women will be hurt the most, even if by not very much.
RobertT
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 6645
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 14:26
Gender: Male

Re: Spending Review: Millions face cut in value of workplace pensions - Sound scarier than it looks

Post by RobertT »

It'll affect section C pensioners more because their pensions currently increase by RPI and that is generally quite a lot higher, relatively speaking than CPI(H).

The difference between CPI and CPI(H) isn't too big, but CPI(H) is still generally a bit lower, so that will a fairly small impact on section B pensioners.

There's a graph showing RPI, CPI and CPI(H) since 2006 here: https://www.hymans.co.uk/insights/resea ... -pensions/

It might not sound too important but the main problem with this change will be the compounding effect it has on our pensions - over 20 or 30 years of retirement a section C member in particular, could receive a lot less overall.
Links to all RM pension related websites are here
heapsy
Posts: 2949
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 23:40
Gender: Male
Location: Drinking with Gangsters

Re: Spending Review: Millions face cut in value of workplace pensions - Sound scarier than it looks

Post by heapsy »

Yet another change that, for many, will go unnoticed. :d'oh!
JKSmudge
Posts: 395
Joined: 26 Mar 2015, 13:39
Gender: Male

Re: Spending Review: Millions face cut in value of workplace pensions - Sound scarier than it looks

Post by JKSmudge »

The 'good news' AFAIK is that it is not until 2030, there had been speculaation on it being implememented by 2025....
FAB
Posts: 234
Joined: 06 May 2017, 22:57
Gender: Male

Re: Spending Review: Millions face cut in value of workplace pensions - Sound scarier than it looks

Post by FAB »

heapsy wrote:
26 Nov 2020, 00:28
Yet another change that, for many, will go unnoticed. :d'oh!
It's like when Section B went from RPI to CPI in 2010. I met a retired postie in .Section B who was puzzled as to why he didn't get an increase in 2016 (when CPI was a minus figure). While a fellow postie he knew got a 0.8% increase who was in Section C. He told me it must be a disability allowance! So yes very few posties will notice..
heapsy
Posts: 2949
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 23:40
Gender: Male
Location: Drinking with Gangsters

Re: Spending Review: Millions face cut in value of workplace pensions - Sound scarier than it looks

Post by heapsy »

JKSmudge wrote:
26 Nov 2020, 11:34
The 'good news' AFAIK is that it is not until 2030, there had been speculaation on it being implememented by 2025....
Yes, but it will still come in and make a difference to our retirement income. Workers are getting shafted all the time. No wonder many just don't bother putting money away, the government are killing the incentive to save / invest for the future.