ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

This will not be a popular post

Latest news, comm's, LTB'S, and discussion on 'The pathway to change'.
feduppostie
Posts: 947
Joined: 24 Jun 2007, 19:46

This will not be a popular post

Post by feduppostie »

I did warn you

I'm a postie with many years in the job

we are being balloted yet again ( yes it feels like that sigh), my first point is, have the union got their s**t together this time? Personally I'm getting pretty fed up with delivering a yes vote only to see it overturned by RM lawyers - personally I need to know if I vote to go out on strike that it is legal - my worry is eventually RM will let us go out - then drop the bombshell that it is not legal and only allow us back in on inferior contracts ( am I paranoid maybe, but any experts out there could it happen?)

my next point, letter volumes are falling, we have all seen it day to day - so what do we do? We all want our jobs to continue and our pensions be safe - and at the end of the day this is all we really care about - yes we can bang drums and big up our union, but if things are bad what should we do? Do we strike in the hoe the union have made things legal this time?

My third point - so many people rely on overtime - is a strike really a realistic?

Let's face it all RM have to do is offer us a 3 year deal with a grand attached and telling us we could do a 5 day week ( despite the day we lose probably being Tuesday not Saturday) and the masses would lap it up and vote for it ( rightly or wrongly)

You will all tell me I'm wrong and the union can win this time - I don't think they can

You won't like this post - pontificate away
Hitcher
Posts: 1447
Joined: 20 Sep 2009, 09:59
Gender: Male

This will not be a popular post

Post by Hitcher »

The union f****d up last year and they've f****d up now because there is no point striking when the volumes are down and we're lapsing every day of the week. They'll have their agency workers in doing the packets and you'll have 2 days worth of mail when you go back the next day and they'll say you'll have time because we've got the lapsed covered today.
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

This will not be a popular post

Post by aiden01 »

Without going through your whole post mate i feel the same way my thoughts are to vote No because i have no faith in cwu locally or nationally.. personally think rm are 10 steps ahead of cwu.. just my thoughts
HTPostman
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1500
Joined: 01 Sep 2008, 23:53
Gender: Male

This will not be a popular post

Post by HTPostman »

This will also be an unpopular post....

I feel the exact same way. I feel deflated and worn out by all the ‘fight for our lives, solidarity, this time we mean business’ etc. I genuinely thought we’d be out in December, it felt like a golden chance, a once in a lifetime opportunity to once and for all sort things out. The union should’ve hired the best lawyer in the business to oversee that ballot, pay him his £1500 an hour or whatever it is and ensure it was all above board and legal. Instead no matter how you look at it, it was a failure.

Since then there have been no gate meetings, nothing from the union rep....it feels like I’m in a football team who’ve just gone into the changing room at halftime 10-0 down and someone in the distance (Terry on his Facebook videos) shouting at us telling us we can win this.

Sorry for the ‘I’m alright Jack’ attitude but all I want now is to keep my job. I’m a fighter (hell, I’ve run a half marathon with a sprained ankle, sat with my mum through gruelling chemo sessions helping her beat cancer 3 times) but I don’t have the fight for this anymore. I no longer care if an extra 100 calls are put on my round, if I have to clock in, if every tracked parcel needs age verification, if I’m made to start half an hour later. I just want to come out of these worrying times with a job.

As a returning postman I strangley enough love the job more this time round (1st time it was still publicly owned ). And no I’m not one of the managers chosen ones, I’m a part time floater put on any round they ask with hardly any long weekends.

It’s just between me doing the job the first time and then coming back I’ve done some real crap jobs - customer services, cleaning up in pubs. So many saying this is an awful job perhaps have never done another line of work.

Despite the indoor chaos in the depot it’s overall still a good job. So long as I don’t have £2+ cut off my hourly rate or have to provide my own van then I’ll cope.
The day is gonna come when we’re all gonna have to testify.

526
wdo1256
Posts: 106
Joined: 10 May 2007, 19:44
Location: Wirral

This will not be a popular post

Post by wdo1256 »

Feduppostie

Everyone is allowed their own views. That's the point of this website. I don't agree with you for the reasons below.

The CWU is far from perfect but life without a strong union will not improve things.
The reason the strike was overturned was due to people taking out mail out of the fitting before it reached the home address. This led to an allegation that there was pressure to open and vote in the office. Sounds like the Employee Opinion Survey being locked in a room and forced to fill one out.

If the next strike is not legal then Royal Mail will have to inform us before we go out on strike. Therefore they cannot say that that is illegal and impose a inferior contract. The CWU would be sued 1st.

They are already trying to change our contracts via shift pattern changes, ie later start times or getting rid of 9 day fortnights, Wallingtons.

Letters are declining, however parcels are increasing. we all want a job and a good pension. Remember 18 months ago Royal Mail was going to change our pension for the third time and only the CWU stood up and said No to the original proposal Without the CWU making Royal Mail changing their plans we would be on a worse pension, including Managers. If we do nothing we are giving Royal Mail to do anything they want and be grateful for anything they decide to throw our way. Remember Rico was paid £6 million just to swap duties.

For the time being we are required to deliver to every address in the country 6 days a week. I don't now how easy that would be and remember all those voters who demand a delivery every day. Their local MP will do something about it or run the risk of losing votes.

If we get a strong yes vote it may be enough to avert a strike. The ones that rely on the overtime will end up losing the most, every duties axed will reduce the overtime opportunities.

The final point is that their are plenty of crap jobs out there, it may be the case that they didn't have a union to back them.
hero22
Posts: 574
Joined: 21 Mar 2016, 19:48
Gender: Male

This will not be a popular post

Post by hero22 »

HTPostman wrote:This will also be an unpopular post....

I feel the exact same way. I feel deflated and worn out by all the ‘fight for our lives, solidarity, this time we mean business’ etc. I genuinely thought we’d be out in December, it felt like a golden chance, a once in a lifetime opportunity to once and for all sort things out. The union should’ve hired the best lawyer in the business to oversee that ballot, pay him his £1500 an hour or whatever it is and ensure it was all above board and legal. Instead no matter how you look at it, it was a failure.

Since then there have been no gate meetings, nothing from the union rep....it feels like I’m in a football team who’ve just gone into the changing room at halftime 10-0 down and someone in the distance (Terry on his Facebook videos) shouting at us telling us we can win this.

Sorry for the ‘I’m alright Jack’ attitude but all I want now is to keep my job. I’m a fighter (hell, I’ve run a half marathon with a sprained ankle, sat with my mum through gruelling chemo sessions helping her beat cancer 3 times) but I don’t have the fight for this anymore. I no longer care if an extra 100 calls are put on my round, if I have to clock in, if every tracked parcel needs age verification, if I’m made to start half an hour later. I just want to come out of these worrying times with a job.

As a returning postman I strangley enough love the job more this time round (1st time it was still publicly owned ). And no I’m not one of the managers chosen ones, I’m a part time floater put on any round they ask with hardly any long weekends.

It’s just between me doing the job the first time and then coming back I’ve done some real crap jobs - customer services, cleaning up in pubs. So many saying this is an awful job perhaps have never done another line of work.

Despite the indoor chaos in the depot it’s overall still a good job. So long as I don’t have £2+ cut off my hourly rate or have to provide my own van then I’ll cope.
I agree with everything you said and wonder how many more are beginning to feel this way then I think that if royal mail get it easy this time then they will just keep on taking. Its so frustrating that this worry and anguish we are feeling about job security is down to the greed of a few. At the end of the day I also think we will end up turning on each other if it means saving our own job at the expense of others. Sad but probably true :sad:
LouBarlow
Posts: 4657
Joined: 15 Oct 2007, 18:56

This will not be a popular post

Post by LouBarlow »

It takes two seconds to tick the yes box and pop your voting form back in the envelope. Hardly exhausting to vote again to support the union who is defending your job.
wacko74
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1572
Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 20:35
Gender: Male

This will not be a popular post

Post by wacko74 »

I can't support the unions blanket opposition to all and any job losses, especially via a reduction in the USO.

Mail volumes are dropping and it's now only a very small percentage of letters that are genuinely 'important' and time sensitive.

There is scope for the business to be 'streamlined' and for jobs to go via a reduction from 6 days to 5 days and I think the union should acknowledge and accept this fact and instead be using it's power to agree to the best possible VR terms for those who are willing to go whist ensuring that those who stay retain their current levels of pay and T&C's
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

This will not be a popular post

Post by aiden01 »

LouBarlow wrote:It takes two seconds to tick the yes box and pop your voting form back in the envelope. Hardly exhausting to vote again to support the union who is defending your job.
Also only takes 2 seconds to vote no.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 11947
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

This will not be a popular post

Post by SpacePhoenix »

wacko74 wrote:I can't support the unions blanket opposition to all and any job losses, especially via a reduction in the USO.

Mail volumes are dropping and it's now only a very small percentage of letters that are genuinely 'important' and time sensitive.

There is scope for the business to be 'streamlined' and for jobs to go via a reduction from 6 days to 5 days and I think the union should acknowledge and accept this fact and instead be using it's power to agree to the best possible VR terms for those who are willing to go whist ensuring that those who stay retain their current levels of pay and T&C's
Packets will never fully go from 6 days down to 5, if anything I think a limited amount will go 7 day with a premium paid for Sunday delivery. There are already some couriers who deliver on Sundays
wacko74
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1572
Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 20:35
Gender: Male

This will not be a popular post

Post by wacko74 »

SpacePhoenix wrote:
wacko74 wrote:I can't support the unions blanket opposition to all and any job losses, especially via a reduction in the USO.

Mail volumes are dropping and it's now only a very small percentage of letters that are genuinely 'important' and time sensitive.

There is scope for the business to be 'streamlined' and for jobs to go via a reduction from 6 days to 5 days and I think the union should acknowledge and accept this fact and instead be using it's power to agree to the best possible VR terms for those who are willing to go whist ensuring that those who stay retain their current levels of pay and T&C's
Packets will never fully go from 6 days down to 5, if anything I think a limited amount will go 7 day with a premium paid for Sunday delivery. There are already some couriers who deliver on Sundays
The USO doesn't cover pkts, but I agree it would make most commercial sense to start delivering pkts 7 days a week including evenings... so scope for more hours and jobs through that, whilst acknowledging and accepting the cost savings that can be made by letter deliveries being reduced to 5 days a week.

Yet the CWU still keeps banging on about the ''vital pubic service'' we provide by delivering letters 6 days a week.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 11947
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

This will not be a popular post

Post by SpacePhoenix »

Like it or not one thing RM will eventually have to do is have barcodes on all packets. Every other courier tracks all parcels whilst in their network. I reckon if Tracked was made widely available, then the amount of SDs would drastically drop. I wonder how many people who send stuff SD would use Tracked instead if they have the chance
Coinbags
Posts: 34
Joined: 26 Jan 2018, 22:42
Gender: Male

This will not be a popular post

Post by Coinbags »

The reason the strike was overturned was due to people taking out mail out of the fitting before it reached the home address. This led to an allegation that there was pressure to open and vote in the office. Sounds like the Employee Opinion Survey being locked in a room and forced to fill one out.

The reason it was overturned was the Union uploading this onto their Facebook account.
The still haven't full apologised to their members for this error; instead blaming the establishment.
grchpo
Posts: 488
Joined: 16 Mar 2019, 13:59
Gender: Male

This will not be a popular post

Post by grchpo »

wacko74 wrote:I can't support the unions blanket opposition to all and any job losses, especially via a reduction in the USO.

Mail volumes are dropping and it's now only a very small percentage of letters that are genuinely 'important' and time sensitive.

There is scope for the business to be 'streamlined' and for jobs to go via a reduction from 6 days to 5 days and I think the union should acknowledge and accept this fact and instead be using it's power to agree to the best possible VR terms for those who are willing to go whist ensuring that those who stay retain their current levels of pay and T&C's
How can you accept a 5 day week, which day would you have off. If a customer is waiting for an important letter should we just tell them we will get it to you some time.
And the best way to strike is an overtime ban, not 1 day out & then back in to catch up & then 1 day out then back in & so it would continue. RM cannot cope without overtime, they can cope with 1 day out, also can you cope with losing a days pay each week, four days less pay each month at least, oh well maybe the bank will wait for the mortgage payment this month & next month......
Hitcher
Posts: 1447
Joined: 20 Sep 2009, 09:59
Gender: Male

This will not be a popular post

Post by Hitcher »

grchpo wrote:If a customer is waiting for an important letter should we just tell them we will get it to you some time.
Specials and packets will stay 6 days a week.