Royal Mail in legal bid to block national Christmas strike : CWU response

Acca Dacca · Post by **Acca Dacca** » 12 Nov 2019, 16:41

daveyeff wrote:what does that prove. ballot envelopes sealed as well. could've voted no for all we know.

EDIT

daveyeff · Post by **daveyeff** » 12 Nov 2019, 16:45

they could've voted at home and brought them in to work, so regardless of what he says in the vid, they may have already cast their votes, so it holds no grounds imo

Acca Dacca · Post by **Acca Dacca** » 12 Nov 2019, 16:50

daveyeff wrote:they could've voted at home and brought them in to work, so regardless of what he says in the vid, they may have already cast their votes, so it holds no grounds imo

I agree

daveyeff · Post by **daveyeff** » 12 Nov 2019, 16:55

I suppose they'll try anything though. as Terry P. says in todays vid outside the high court, ..'' they asked us to postpone the ballot and they would still give us the full 6 months if we had?? so they were prepared to give us an extension on an ''ILLEGAL'' ballot!!''

Post by **Takeitforaride** » 13 Nov 2019, 13:46

In the video they say that the evidence is solely one managers opinion of what he THINKS happened.