ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Am I Reading This Wrong?

Latest news, comm's, LTB'S, and discussion on 'The pathway to change'.
pinstripe
Posts: 2452
Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
Gender: Male
Location: 2 left turns from reality

Am I Reading This Wrong?

Post by pinstripe »

RM want to cut 20,000 jobs through the removal of large packets and tracked from D.O’s. They are also looking at the USO, which if they go to mythical Monday to Friday delivery’s ( or more realistically Monday, Wednesday , Thursday , Friday and Saturday ) would also result in a minimum of 20,000 job losses.
40,000 out of a workforce of 110,000, please tell me I’ve misread this.
rogersh
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1368
Joined: 26 Oct 2011, 11:31
Gender: Male

Am I Reading This Wrong?

Post by rogersh »

The 110,000 are CWU members. The total workforce is circa 140,000 I believe.
Edit;
As of 2019, Royal Mail employs around 162,000 permanent postal workers, of which 143,000 are UK based roles, and 90,000 are postmen and women.
chickenwittle
Posts: 2056
Joined: 15 Nov 2009, 09:43
Gender: Male

Am I Reading This Wrong?

Post by chickenwittle »

To much speculation and not enough facts in this dispute so far .Royal Mail don’t seem to be playing the propaganda game this time round all the talk seems to be coming from the Cwu .
rambo1
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3266
Joined: 12 Jun 2013, 20:00
Gender: Male

Am I Reading This Wrong?

Post by rambo1 »

Removing the large pkts isn't gonna slash 20000 jobs, how can it? Someone still has to deliver them.
wacko74
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1572
Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 20:35
Gender: Male

Am I Reading This Wrong?

Post by wacko74 »

rambo1 wrote:Removing the large pkts isn't gonna slash 20000 jobs, how can it? Someone still has to deliver them.

It will slash 20,000 jobs on current pay and T&C's.

They will be delivered by the new employees at the new parcel hubs, on minimum wage, zero hours ''self employed'' etc
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16215
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Am I Reading This Wrong?

Post by clashcityrocker »

rambo1 wrote:Removing the large pkts isn't gonna slash 20000 jobs, how can it? Someone still has to deliver them.
Removing the sorting from the DO and increasing the automation along the pipeline will cut jobs.
People will still need to deliver them, you are correct, and it has been said approx 3000 jobs will be created in those offices currently operating as LAT hubs.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
miles_peters
Posts: 294
Joined: 19 Jul 2014, 12:29
Gender: Male

Am I Reading This Wrong?

Post by miles_peters »

no more rest day cover duty is where alot of the job losses will come from
1984
Posts: 88
Joined: 17 Feb 2011, 22:17
Gender: Male

Am I Reading This Wrong?

Post by 1984 »

rogersh wrote:The 110,000 are CWU members. The total workforce is circa 140,000 I believe.
Edit;
As of 2019, Royal Mail employs around 162,000 permanent postal workers, of which 143,000 are UK based roles, and 90,000 are postmen and women.
What are the other 19k doing?
DGH
Posts: 666
Joined: 13 Dec 2014, 18:04
Gender: Male
Location: Neither here nor there

Am I Reading This Wrong?

Post by DGH »

1984 wrote:
rogersh wrote:The 110,000 are CWU members. The total workforce is circa 140,000 I believe.
Edit;
As of 2019, Royal Mail employs around 162,000 permanent postal workers, of which 143,000 are UK based roles, and 90,000 are postmen and women.
What are the other 19k doing?
Slaving for GLS in Europe, I should think (presuming these are the figures for Royal Mail Group, so Royal Mail, Parcelforce Worldwide and GLS).
GRS
Posts: 808
Joined: 15 Jun 2015, 18:38
Gender: Female
Location: South West

Am I Reading This Wrong?

Post by GRS »

chickenwittle wrote:To much speculation and not enough facts in this dispute so far .Royal Mail don’t seem to be playing the propaganda game this time round all the talk seems to be coming from the Cwu .

Yes RM very very quiet this time around. Could be worrying as it seems they are quite happy for us to strike! However CWU saying that RM are keeping quiet in the hope that people are disengaged from the conflict and won’t vote. This may well work as plenty in my DO seem oblivious to what’s going on or see it as the union just causing trouble!!
magicw
Posts: 111
Joined: 11 May 2013, 14:50
Gender: Male

Am I Reading This Wrong?

Post by magicw »

clashcityrocker wrote:
rambo1 wrote:Removing the large pkts isn't gonna slash 20000 jobs, how can it? Someone still has to deliver them.
Removing the sorting from the DO and increasing the automation along the pipeline will cut jobs.
People will still need to deliver them, you are correct, and it has been said approx 3000 jobs will be created in those offices currently operating as LAT hubs.

This is why its Important to get the SWW to 35 hours, Automation will inevitably remove hours from Prep at some point, Sure none of us want to be on 8 hour delivery walks. Asked our DOM in WTL today about the Second Hour coming off in October, Said straight up it wasnt going to happen, as the hour coming off last year had cost the Company £100 million ?????????? If we lost another 3 then we wouldnt be profitable. God knows where they get that from.

All he wanted to do was get us to sign for Liability for this new Over 25 ID packet product! Surely if we are in disagreement with RM , (which he's as good as admitted to) then we shouldnt be agreeing to any new processes or products???????