ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Vince Cable defends controversial Royal Mail privatisation on Scottish visit

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72561
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Vince Cable defends controversial Royal Mail privatisation on Scottish visit

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://files.heraldscotland.com/news/15 ... ish_visit/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

LIBERAL Democrat leader Vince Cable has defended the controversial privatisation of Royal Mail that he presided over during his time as Business Secretary.

Cable said the sell-off was a "successful episode" of the five years of Tory-Lib Dem coalition government at Westminster from 2010 to 2015.

Speaking to the Sunday Herald, Cable said the move had revived the service and allowed it to raise funds for investment.

He also denied the taxpayer has lost out by £1billion because of the privatisation, which critics say was sold off too cheaply.

However, Labour MP Hugh Gaffney, a former postman, said the policy had been a "disaster" by leaving customers and employees worse off.

Cable, who was elected unopposed as Lib Dem leader last month, defended the policy during a visit to Edinburgh, where he met supporters.

Cable said of the privatisation: "That caused some controversy, but actually it was a successful episode. It was the only way to raise capital for the Royal Mail to expand because it was a dying business and we know why it was dying because of email.

"Every time someone sent an email it was taking business from the Royal Mail so they had to change their business to make it a logistics company and to do that they had to raise lot of capital. It's been a success so I don't see that as being in anyway a negative."

Westminster Business, Innovation and Skills Select Committee previously said that taxpayers may have lost out on about £1bn from the undervaluing of Royal Mail.

However, Cable responded: "After the actual sale of the Royal Mail itself there was a bubble of the price of the shares which I predicted at the time actually. But it subsided after a year and a lot of those people who brought shares having read in the press that they were undervalued got their fingers burnt."

Gaffney, the MP for Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill, insisted the sell-off had left the taxpayer worse off.

He said: "The privatisation of Royal Mail has been a disaster, leaving workers and customers worse off. This Lib Dem/Tory stitch-up has done nothing but lose taxpayers money while making a fortune for Cameron and his cronies.

"A Labour government would take Royal Mail back into public ownership and deliver a service that works for the many, not the few."
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Tman
Posts: 4129
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Vince Cable defends controversial Royal Mail privatisation on Scottish visit

Post by Tman »

That article was all going so well until the last line....then the temptation to write utter bollix became too great.

A Labour government would take Royal Mail back into public ownership and deliver a service that works for the many, not the few."


Apart from paraphrasing the current Labour Party's nonsensical clichéd sig-line, who are these "many" who RM's not working for?
Phantom
Posts: 1234
Joined: 27 Dec 2007, 18:17
Gender: Female
Location: New York

Vince Cable defends controversial Royal Mail privatisation on Scottish visit

Post by Phantom »

Expand? this company has done f**k all since privatisation, well apart from shrink!!!
CUT OFF!!!
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Vince Cable defends controversial Royal Mail privatisation on Scottish visit

Post by Lounge Lizard »

Phantom wrote:Expand? this company has done f**k all since privatisation, well apart from shrink!!!
- and pay loads of hard earned money out as dividends. :thumbdown
taxi4leighton
Posts: 343
Joined: 11 Oct 2007, 14:05

Vince Cable defends controversial Royal Mail privatisation on Scottish visit

Post by taxi4leighton »

Tman wrote:That article was all going so well until the last line....then the temptation to write utter bollix became too great.

A Labour government would take Royal Mail back into public ownership and deliver a service that works for the many, not the few."


Apart from paraphrasing the current Labour Party's nonsensical clichéd sig-line, who are these "many" who RM's not working for?
part time staff who little chance of becoming full tilme.
people who are going to lose thousands if not tens of thousands if pension proposals go through,
thousands of posties who are constantly bullied.
thats the many,the few are,
moya greene and her cronies,who have had massive
wage increases,massive pension contributions ,massive bonuses and massive share incentitive bonuses,
thats who
Tman
Posts: 4129
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Vince Cable defends controversial Royal Mail privatisation on Scottish visit

Post by Tman »

You don't really believe Corbyn knows or even cares about worsening industrial relations in RM, do you?
You don't honestly think his proposal to renationalise RM is to "better the lot" of posties, do you?
Come off it, on both counts.
Nick b
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 32
Joined: 22 Jul 2017, 21:57
Gender: Male

Vince Cable defends controversial Royal Mail privatisation on Scottish visit

Post by Nick b »

If sound bites were hard cash all politicians would be very wealthy. Mr Corbyn would be a millionaire. Sadly it only shows how naive the younger generation has become to believe verbatim what he is saying.