ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

State pension review sparks fears over retirement age

Royal Mail pension news and discussion.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32702
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

State pension review sparks fears over retirement age

Post by POSTMAN »

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-35702441" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Image

A review of the state pension age could mean people joining the workforce today will have to wait until their mid-70s before they retire, experts have warned.

Former CBI boss John Cridland has been appointed to lead the review, the first of regular five-year assessments.

Those under the age of about 55 could be affected by the shake-up, which will consider what the state retirement age should be from April 2028.

The results will be published next May.

The government said the review, required under existing legislation, would consider changes in life expectancy as well as wider changes in society and "make sure that the state pension is sustainable and affordable for future generations."

It said it would also consider whether "the current system of a universal state pension age" rising in line with life expectancy was "optimal in the long run".
This suggests the review will look at whether the retirement age should rise even if life expectancy slows.

'Faster than planned'

Currently, the state pension age is set to be 67 for both men and women by 2028.

"It's not just about raising it [state pension age], it's about considering the best way to manage the state pension age policy," Pensions minister, Baroness Roz Altmann, told the BBC.

But Tom McPhail, head of retirement policy at financial services firm Hargreaves Lansdown, said the review meant state retirement age would increase faster than currently expected.

"We fully expect state pension ages to go up faster than currently planned, and those joining the workforce today are likely to find themselves waiting until their mid-70s to get a payout from the state system," he said.

Shadow work and pensions secretary Owen Smith also warned that "the terms of this review may suggest that the Tory Government is set to speed up rises in the state pension age, throwing into chaos the retirement plans of millions of British workers."
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
jetblack
Posts: 974
Joined: 15 Apr 2011, 12:54
Gender: Male

State pension review sparks fears over retirement age

Post by jetblack »

Good security means trying to limit the damage a Trusted role can do
Fatboyslim
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 117
Joined: 30 May 2010, 10:27
Gender: Male

State pension review sparks fears over retirement age

Post by Fatboyslim »

What - they are going to pay you a whole year...? I think in blue-collar jobs. They hope we all draw nothing. While billions go out of this country in foreign aid, EEC etc...
jetblack
Posts: 974
Joined: 15 Apr 2011, 12:54
Gender: Male

State pension review sparks fears over retirement age

Post by jetblack »

Image
Fatboyslim wrote:
What - they are going to pay you a whole year...?
My mistake - according to the graph above I'll be working, as I said, till I'm 72, but I will, in fact, be dead by the age of 71 :hmmmm

On a more serious note, how is life expectancy worked out ? I mean, if my state pension is going to be cut on account of it (life expectancy) increasing, it would be nice to know how its worked out, and wether the method used is just and equitable etc.

I mean, I know George Osborne is gonna spend 10% more time in retirement than me, and that he can expect to live up to 8 years longer than me (and in better health for those 8 years I might add) (I'll be dead - but you know what I mean).
But I've done my bit - I've worked hard, I've contributed - I'm not a bad sort - do I really have to spend the autumn of my years in poverty ?
Good security means trying to limit the damage a Trusted role can do
GRS
Posts: 813
Joined: 15 Jun 2015, 18:38
Gender: Female
Location: South West

State pension review sparks fears over retirement age

Post by GRS »

They keep going on about life expectancy increasing and then the next thing you hear is them saying that due to obesity etc people are going to die younger and infact be dead before their parents so something doesn't add up.
toomuchcoke
Posts: 309
Joined: 05 Jun 2011, 18:15
Gender: Male

State pension review sparks fears over retirement age

Post by toomuchcoke »

GRS wrote:They keep going on about life expectancy increasing and then the next thing you hear is them saying that due to obesity etc people are going to die younger and infact be dead before their parents so something doesn't add up.
Just because the number of obese people who shuffle off early[1] is going up, doesn't mean that overall life expectancy can't be going up too. It just means that life expectancy for the non-obese is going up even faster than the average rate in order to compensate. If the number of obese people is rising slower than the increase in population then though more people would be dying young due to obesity-related disorders, overall life expectancy would still be going up. If the number's growing faster than ultimately that effect on life expectancy will swamp the effects of better healthcare, cleaner air and such like.

[1] Don't think of it as dying young, say rather that they're leaving early to avoid the rush?