ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

bag weights?

All Health & Safety issues in here.
spiderj
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 969
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 07:54
Gender: Male
Location: ctp

bag weights?

Post by spiderj »

Apologies if its been covered before

Anyone got a link to current weight /guidelines?

Took trolley as a bag felt heavy today...well a few did

Heaviest was 14 kg and would have involved approx half a mile with not massive steps but steps all the same.

Cheery much
:thumbup
I won
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16472
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: bag weights?

Post by clashcityrocker »

If you are using a HCT then bag weights are irrelevant.
If you are using a LWT then it carries 16kg each side.

Once assigned the use of delivery method equipment is mandatory.

If you have flats etc where a bag is the appropriate method of delivery then 5 or 8 kg.

All bags/trolleys should be weighed before leaving the DO.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Jamesethefirst
Posts: 146
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 17:48
Gender: Male

Re: bag weights?

Post by Jamesethefirst »

clashcityrocker wrote:If you are using a HCT then bag weights are irrelevant.
If you are using a LWT then it carries 16kg each side.

Once assigned the use of delivery method equipment is mandatory.

If you have flats etc where a bag is the appropriate method of delivery then 5 or 8 kg.

All bags/trolleys should be weighed before leaving the DO.
Where does all this happen? Haven't seen a bag weighed by anybody ,or challenged by a manager in many years.
Most of the LWT at our office just lie around littering the place up, very few if anyone ever uses them.
Another well thought through idea, completely ignored by the majority.
Himaggen
Posts: 993
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 23:40

Re: bag weights?

Post by Himaggen »

Jamesethefirst wrote:Most of the LWT at our office just lie around littering the place up, very few if anyone ever uses them.
Another well thought through idea, completely ignored by the majority.
Forget the majority, IGNORED BY YOU, (except when it suits).

Look up the following phrases
  • Mandatory equipment
  • Gross misconduct
spiderj
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 969
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 07:54
Gender: Male
Location: ctp

Re: bag weights?

Post by spiderj »

Thanks clash

Was convinced 8kg was still on the go

The lovely folk don't make it easy to find the duty schedule

Caught em out a few times

Ended up taking trolley with 14/10/12 etc at a time as I was unwilling to Traverse the terrain with that weight in those bags

Carried more in a previous life
But the weight was even

Heavy but even

And that was twenty years ago
:nana
I won
Jamesethefirst
Posts: 146
Joined: 10 Dec 2013, 17:48
Gender: Male

Re: bag weights?

Post by Jamesethefirst »

Himaggen wrote:
Jamesethefirst wrote:Most of the LWT at our office just lie around littering the place up, very few if anyone ever uses them.
Another well thought through idea, completely ignored by the majority.
Forget the majority, IGNORED BY YOU, (except when it suits).

Look up the following phrases
  • Mandatory equipment
  • Gross misconduct
Fair enough, so are they going to conduct everyone and dismiss them for gross misconduct? Thought not.
As I said ignored by the majority, therefore the "mandatory " element is not enforced, so has no credibility.
For your information, I never stated that I ignored the equipment, so unless you know me and know how I work , do not accuse me of doing so. Thank you and good night.
bustedflush
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1493
Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 11:19
Gender: Male

Re: bag weights?

Post by bustedflush »

I've carried bags so heavy that I have had the straps tear off - in fact it happened again today. Can't complete in time using trolleys. Today was mad. I told lino that we would probably bring the lapsing back. Sure enough rang at 1pm as agreed, got the crap 'you'll have to work to time for the rest of the week now especially Saturday'....(like we'd ever finish this awful pair of rounds early.)
Got back and told him no way can you say that after completing the assigned rounds and leaving the office 10 minutes late - lapsing doesn't come into it and not doing it doesn't class as 'cutting off' especially as we worked slightly over our hours anyway just to complete the rounds. It's ABSORPTION and not doing it because it's not possible in your time does NOT class as 'cutting off'. :evil/mad :evil/mad
On the phone we were cajoled and begged to stay out late to complete it.....NO!
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16472
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: bag weights?

Post by clashcityrocker »

Image
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
bustedflush
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1493
Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 11:19
Gender: Male

Re: bag weights?

Post by bustedflush »

clashcityrocker wrote:Image

Jeeze! not nice. Not nice at all. But I see the parallel. Had to have an early finisher sent out to us to day to help us get done on time. Only this time we did do the bloody lapsing, but only because it had to be done first due to specials. Our rep's back now so maybe this stupidity will stop. I'm getting tired of the same effing arguments with the linos every time this happens, which is almost daily now.
Himaggen
Posts: 993
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 23:40

Re: bag weights?

Post by Himaggen »

Jamesethefirst wrote:Fair enough, so are they going to conduct everyone and dismiss them for gross misconduct? Thought not.
As I said ignored by the majority, therefore the "mandatory " element is not enforced, so has no credibility.
For your information, I never stated that I ignored the equipment, so unless you know me and know how I work , do not accuse me of doing so. Thank you and good night.
Apologies for my previous error, the comment was supposed to be directed towards every reader, i.e. compliance starts with you! although reading back could just have well been aimed at spiderj.

Although a decent IR Rep would state that the enforcement is not being fairly applied, the Manager will state that every case is taken on its merits, that the rules have been broken and they will go ahead with their case against that individual.
They don't need to dismiss the entire office, they only need to dismiss one or two individuals before there's a slew of obedient OPG's toeing the line.
bustedflush
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1493
Joined: 16 Feb 2013, 11:19
Gender: Male

Re: bag weights?

Post by bustedflush »

110,000 posties. Sack the 100,000 that avoid trollies whenever they can. See how much lapsing that leaves the remaining 10,000.... :crazy:
spiderj
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 969
Joined: 12 Apr 2013, 07:54
Gender: Male
Location: ctp

Re: bag weights?

Post by spiderj »

Looks like they've started singling out opgs at ours.

Done an hct round today and went over
Arranged dockett before leaving

Used prescribed tools and methods and know what?

I'm not sore or stressed today

Hope at least one person stops carrying too much after reading some of the posts on here

Will it happen? :cuppa
I won