ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Warning Graphic Picture - Postwoman sues RM over dog attack.

All Health & Safety issues in here.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72548
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Warning Graphic Picture - Postwoman sues RM over dog attack.

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Postwoman sues Royal Mail after Holloway dog attack in which she nearly lost a leg

http://www.islingtongazette.co.uk/news/ ... =completed" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

A postie is suing her bosses after being attacked by a dog as she did her rounds.

Image
Patricia Meddings' injuries

Patricia Meddings, 44, needed more than 70 stitches and plastic surgery following the attack by the Japanese akita in Bennett Court Holloway, in September last year.

Royal Mail admitted it had contacted the dog’s owner Ali Derin, 55, of nearby Axminster Road, after concerns were raised by other postal workers before the attack on Ms Meddings.

Derin is now banned from keeping dogs for life and has to pay Ms Meddings £20 a month in compensation for her injuries after pleading guilty to failing to control his dog.

But Ms Meddings who has been a postwoman for 15 years, has been unable to work normal hours since the attack.

She said: “I am lucky to be alive but he has got off lightly. His compensation is a joke.

“That dog was trying to take me out. If it had managed to get me on the ground I wouldn’t be here. Luckily I managed to get to a lamppost while it was gnawing on my leg. I looked down and it had taken all my muscle and fat off my leg.

“Now I am too ashamed to show my legs. It’s disgusting and I am stuck with this for life.

“Owners have to be given bigger punishments.”

Patricia, who lives in Islington, was saved as a passing friend ran to help, shouting at the dog. She had two emergency operations to save the leg, along with skin grafts.

District judge Nina Tempia ordered the dog to be destroyed last month.

Derin was given a five-month electronic tag and ordered to pay £860 in compensation, at the rate of £10 a fortnight.

Patricia is taking legal action through her union against Royal Mail, saying they failed to protect her.

Her lawyer Adrian Fawden, who works for Simpson Millar solicitors on behalf of postal union CWU, said: “We have seen a worrying increase in attacks by dogs on post workers resulting in devastating injuries such as Patricia’s.

“Owners need to do more to ensure their pets are adequately secured, especially if they are aggressive.”

Royal Mail spokeswoman Sally Hopkins said: “Our first priority is to ensure the welfare and safety of our people who provide a valuable service to our customers.

“If we do become aware of a potential hazard, including a dog which is causing concern, we always make contact with the property owner to see whether there are sensible steps which we can jointly agree to make sure our postmen and women are able to deliver to customers without risk of attack.”
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
deltaforce
Posts: 778
Joined: 01 Jan 2009, 15:29
Gender: Male

Re: Warning Graphic Picture - Postwoman sues RM over dog att

Post by deltaforce »

Akitas that's one dog that spooks me. Big powerfull dogs , no place as pets in my opinion.
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: Warning Graphic Picture - Postwoman sues RM over dog att

Post by daveyeff »

appalling injuries,,,,dear me. it looks like the poor woman has been attacked with a chainsaw. an animal capable of inflicting those wounds should not be kept as a pet. even if they are a responsible owner. which obviously he wasnt.