ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

LTB 840/13 Payment of ?200 lump sum and the Christmas Bonus

CWU LTB's
world class male
Posts: 903
Joined: 03 Jul 2013, 15:29
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 840/13 Payment of ?200 lump sum and the Christmas Bo

Post by world class male »

fishtank wrote:
world class male wrote:it's the fact that the ever growing number of sub 39 hour staff are expected to do the same work as a full time worker
How does that work.
A 39 hr employee does 39 hrs of work.
A 30 hr employee does 30 hrs of work.
Anything above that is voluntary and if it isn't speak to your rep.
sigh

all i'm doing is is turning this in to a f/t v's p/t fight, which is exactly the the thing i didn't want but knew it would.
the grievance is with the powers above,and a union who wants what's best for the ever decreasing majority of its f/t membership subs.
in relation to the f/t & p/t situation, most p/t staff do more than quite a few f/t staff week in week out at our office.
why didn't our employers pay what's morally right?
why didn't my union demand what's morally right?
a deal was struck at a time when most are fed up and skint at an expensive time of year and will just be happy to get to the new year breaking even and looking forward to a steady few months after the chaotic sham december brought us.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 840/13 Payment of ?200 lump sum and the Christmas Bo

Post by fishtank »

korky wrote:most p/t staff do more than quite a few f/t staff week in week out at our office.
In hours?
That's different.
In that case the Job Security, Resourcing and Managing Change Agreement should be used to make those part-timers....full-time.

http://www.cwu.org/assets/_files/docume ... _and_m.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The level of part timers’ contracted hours will be jointly reviewed locally on a six monthly basis. Where appropriate, increased contracted hours will be offered to reflect the hours actually worked and planned.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
korky
Posts: 797
Joined: 30 Dec 2007, 09:28

Re: LTB 840/13 Payment of ?200 lump sum and the Christmas Bo

Post by korky »

fishtank wrote:
korky wrote:most p/t staff do more than quite a few f/t staff week in week out at our office.
In hours?
That's different.
In that case the Job Security, Resourcing and Managing Change Agreement should be used to make those part-timers....full-time.

http://www.cwu.org/assets/_files/docume ... _and_m.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The level of part timers’ contracted hours will be jointly reviewed locally on a six monthly basis. Where appropriate, increased contracted hours will be offered to reflect the hours actually worked and planned.
where appropriate is a weird issue, i have a mate contracted to 24 hrs who does done 40ish hours most weeks for well over 2 years, and the gaffa wont make him up
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16613
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: LTB 840/13 Payment of ?200 lump sum and the Christmas Bo

Post by clashcityrocker »

korky wrote:
where appropriate is a weird issue, i have a mate contracted to 24 hrs who does done 40ish hours most weeks for well over 2 years, and the gaffa wont make him up
I think it depends on how he is making up those hours.
Someone once posted that they had to be doing those extra hours on their own duty and not just as random overtime.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
korky
Posts: 797
Joined: 30 Dec 2007, 09:28

Re: LTB 840/13 Payment of ?200 lump sum and the Christmas Bo

Post by korky »

clashcityrocker wrote:
korky wrote:
where appropriate is a weird issue, i have a mate contracted to 24 hrs who does done 40ish hours most weeks for well over 2 years, and the gaffa wont make him up
I think it depends on how he is making up those hours.
Someone once posted that they had to be doing those extra hours on their own duty and not just as random overtime.
he's a reserve, who like most under a just few years service are at the arse end, no chance of his own duty
can you point me to this thread