ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

LtB 771/13 National Dispute

CWU LTB's
Ahebban
Posts: 695
Joined: 19 May 2009, 13:41
Gender: Male
Location: Left of ... Left

LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by Ahebban »

No: 771/13 Ref: 21003 Date: 20th November 2013


To: ALL POSTAL BRANCHES


Dear Colleague

NATIONAL DISPUTE

The Postal Executive has today met and received a comprehensive report on the current state of play in national negotiations.

As a result it was unanimously agreed to accept a new offer from Royal Mail to extend the ballot for the final 7 days that is permissible in law, to allow negotiations to continue and reach an agreement.

Although progress has continued to be made and a new closed pay offer has been tabled, there remain difficult areas to resolve.

The Unions Postal Executive will meet again on Monday 25th November 2013 to further consider the detailed position and determine whether Industrial Action should be announced.

Any enquiries on the content of this LTB should be directed to the DGS (P) Department.


Yours sincerely



Dave Ward
Deputy General Secretary (P)
Ahebban - anglo-saxon in origin - meaning 'Wages War'

What counts is not necessarily the size of the dog in the fight, what counts is the size of the fight in the dog. - Mark Twain
paranoid-android
Posts: 106
Joined: 24 Feb 2010, 09:17
Gender: Male

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by paranoid-android »

"Although progress has continued to be made and a new closed pay offer has been tabled, there remain difficult areas to resolve. "


I hope the union is not going to sell delivery's down the river for 30 pieces of silver.

While I will gladly take any cash rm throw at us this dispute should not concentrate on the money above the oppressive conditions in delivery.

I would rather not take a pay rise and get back to manageable workloads.
postality
Posts: 57
Joined: 14 Feb 2013, 22:03
Gender: Male

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by postality »

paranoid-android wrote:"Although progress has continued to be made and a new closed pay offer has been tabled, there remain difficult areas to resolve. "


I hope the union is not going to sell delivery's down the river for 30 pieces of silver.

While I will gladly take any cash rm throw at us this dispute should not concentrate on the money above the oppressive conditions in delivery.

I would rather not take a pay rise and get back to manageable workloads.
Just work your hours, anything you cant manage is their problem or docket.
paranoid-android
Posts: 106
Joined: 24 Feb 2010, 09:17
Gender: Male

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by paranoid-android »

postality wrote:
paranoid-android wrote:"Although progress has continued to be made and a new closed pay offer has been tabled, there remain difficult areas to resolve. "


I hope the union is not going to sell delivery's down the river for 30 pieces of silver.

While I will gladly take any cash rm throw at us this dispute should not concentrate on the money above the oppressive conditions in delivery.

I would rather not take a pay rise and get back to manageable workloads.
Just work your hours, anything you cant manage is their problem or docket.
That may be true today, but R M want to be able to take away our right to work our hours and make us work the load. Whatever that may be.and however long it takes.
Silly Sarah
Posts: 112
Joined: 06 May 2010, 22:13
Gender: Female
Location: wild west

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by Silly Sarah »

paranoid-android wrote:
postality wrote:
paranoid-android wrote:"Although progress has continued to be made and a new closed pay offer has been tabled, there remain difficult areas to resolve. "


I hope the union is not going to sell delivery's down the river for 30 pieces of silver.

While I will gladly take any cash rm throw at us this dispute should not concentrate on the money above the oppressive conditions in delivery.

I would rather not take a pay rise and get back to manageable workloads.
Just work your hours, anything you cant manage is their problem or docket.
That may be true today, but R M want to be able to take away our right to work our hours and make us work the load. Whatever that may be.and however long it takes.
I can't believe they could make that stick from a legal perspective.
What have I done to deserve this?
borgpicard
Posts: 486
Joined: 05 May 2011, 22:45
Gender: Male

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by borgpicard »

FFS you`ve had 7 months to sort this out
freelunch
Posts: 358
Joined: 14 Oct 2012, 20:39
Gender: Male

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by freelunch »

oh... hold on....
<puts on shocked face >

I am So shocked..... SHOCKED I tell ya :shock:

who'dathunkit :d'oh!
"Everybody has a plan.. until they get punched in the face" - Mike Tyson
timemax
Posts: 22
Joined: 12 Jun 2009, 19:42
Gender: Male

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by timemax »

paranoid-android wrote:
postality wrote:
paranoid-android wrote:"Although progress has continued to be made and a new closed pay offer has been tabled, there remain difficult areas to resolve. "


I hope the union is not going to sell delivery's down the river for 30 pieces of silver.

While I will gladly take any cash rm throw at us this dispute should not concentrate on the money above the oppressive conditions in delivery.

I would rather not take a pay rise and get back to manageable workloads.
Just work your hours, anything you cant manage is their problem or docket.
That may be true today, but R M want to be able to take away our right to work our hours and make us work the load. Whatever that may be.and however long it takes.
That surely is the same as job and finish, which they have just outlawed !
comeracing
Posts: 806
Joined: 28 Nov 2010, 20:58
Gender: Male

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by comeracing »

whats the new closed pay offer ?
Stumpy
Posts: 88
Joined: 08 Oct 2007, 17:25

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by Stumpy »

They are going to bottle it again.

Royal Mail team moving the goalposts right up to where the Christmas cards are going to start coming through and then say, "Now strike if you dare". Of course the public will be fed with the line that the dispute is all about money and the greedy postmen want an unreasonable settlement.

This could and should have been sorted months ago.
Unity is strength
dre33dd
Posts: 96
Joined: 04 Mar 2010, 19:05
Gender: Male

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by dre33dd »

i'm a rep and to be honest its getting silly now.....lets just damned well strike and show them we cannot be messed with.....
sadly i work in a wimpish office who will on the whole bottle it.....
time to be counted!!
bwfcmaddog
Posts: 94
Joined: 19 Oct 2009, 12:12
Gender: Male

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by bwfcmaddog »

Stumpy wrote:They are going to bottle it again.

Royal Mail team moving the goalposts right up to where the Christmas cards are going to start coming through and then say, "Now strike if you dare". Of course the public will be fed with the line that the dispute is all about money and the greedy postmen want an unreasonable settlement.

This could and should have been sorted months ago.
I agree just lie last time ,we had them on the run at Xmas and the union agreed a pathetic deal.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72654
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Now I fully support a strike when its called but I don't think we need a General Haigh moment in reverse - where the troops gladly go over the top seemingly unaware of the consequences.

A strike for some is 1 days unpaid leave, but in reality its a lot different. For a Union to call a strike they have to balance all manner and number of things.

1. What are the aims of the strike - is it really worth striking if the other side are making enough concessions to at least keep talking.
2. What are the aims of the talks - are we really making progress or are we being strung along.
3. What are the benefits of striking now.
4. What are the pitfalls of striking now.
5. Do we have the support of members to strike now, and what would happen if the strike was not well supported.
6. What extra concessions are possible from striking, and are the extra costs worth those concessions.
7. What are the Political ramifications of striking.
9. What are the Industrial ramifications of striking.
10. What are the financial implications of striking for the Union its members, and the business.

The question I suppose is do we trust the Unions judgement.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Chelseablue
Posts: 2210
Joined: 19 Aug 2013, 14:33
Gender: Female

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by Chelseablue »

Cant blieve were not out yet this has went on for months now we need to show we mean business and look after our t and conditions if not well have years of bollox to put up with in our working lives ahead of us
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: LtB 771/13 National Dispute

Post by fishtank »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:The question I suppose is do we trust the Unions judgement.
It's not the union's judgement on whether to call a strike that worries me but their judgement on whether or not to keep the pretence up.

If you assess all of those things and come to the conclusion that a strike is not in the best interests of the negotiation process then that's fine,it's what we pay the union for,to make those kinds of calls but if you do then the best thing to do is withdraw the threat of strike action entirely because if you can see that you can be damn sure those on the other side of the table can see it too.

If you don't what you are left with is an empty threat and 115,000 impatient members not knowing whether they are coming or going,It isn't fair on the membership,It isn't honest and above all it isn't serving any purpose other than making the union look foolish.

If the union truly believes it can finalise an agreement by next week then fine it can be done without the silly,empty threat and with the membership stood down,If they had any doubt whatsoever they should have served notice a week ago if not before then.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share