ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

LTB 764/13 Update Postal Digital Assistant (PDA)

CWU LTB's
Glenno
Posts: 1491
Joined: 05 Jun 2007, 13:12

Re: LTB 764/13 Update Postal Digital Assistant (PDA)

Post by Glenno »

fishtank wrote:
As reported in the aforementioned LTB, there were aspirations that a smaller model than the Intermec CN3 would be developed as it was considered too bulky at the time for anyone other than drivers, but with the roll out of the delivery methods programme and the increase in packet traffic it has been necessary to review their use and suitability.

So the union has gone from a position that they were too bulky for anyone other than drivers to a position where they are suddenly fine for everyone?
What brought about the flip flop this time? :cuppa
:Applause :Applause :Applause same thinking Fish
5plusbonusball
Posts: 1136
Joined: 12 Jan 2012, 20:50
Gender: Male
Location: up north of watford

Re: LTB 764/13 Update Postal Digital Assistant (PDA)

Post by 5plusbonusball »

What's the first thing customers do? Turn it around cos it looks upside down. :arrrghhh
Few complaints with them? :arrrghhh :arrrghhh
Adds 30+ minutes on any duty :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh
Why are lino's paid full-time ??
Himaggen
Posts: 993
Joined: 09 Oct 2007, 23:40

Re: LTB 764/13 Update Postal Digital Assistant (PDA)

Post by Himaggen »

fishtank wrote:
As reported in the aforementioned LTB, there were aspirations that a smaller model than the Intermec CN3 would be developed as it was considered too bulky at the time for anyone other than drivers, but with the roll out of the delivery methods programme and the increase in packet traffic it has been necessary to review their use and suitability.

So the union has gone from a position that they were too bulky for anyone other than drivers to a position where they are suddenly fine for everyone?
What brought about the flip flop this time? :cuppa
I've sent several emails to Mr Joyce regarding this self same issue but he hasn't even had the decency to attempt a response!
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 764/13 Update Postal Digital Assistant (PDA)

Post by dvbuk55 »

Himaggen wrote:
fishtank wrote:
As reported in the aforementioned LTB, there were aspirations that a smaller model than the Intermec CN3 would be developed as it was considered too bulky at the time for anyone other than drivers, but with the roll out of the delivery methods programme and the increase in packet traffic it has been necessary to review their use and suitability.

So the union has gone from a position that they were too bulky for anyone other than drivers to a position where they are suddenly fine for everyone?
What brought about the flip flop this time? :cuppa
I've sent several emails to Mr Joyce regarding this self same issue but he hasn't even had the decency to attempt a response!
You see your email doesn't have the same weight as the one from Moya, "Joyce get those PDAs out NOW - feck the weight, we'll put a Joint Statement out and you stick it on an LTB, savvy?"