ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Sentencing for dogs offences should be tougher, says CWU

All Health & Safety issues in here.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72548
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Sentencing for dogs offences should be tougher, says CWU

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://www.cwu.org/news/archive/sentenc ... s-cwu.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The Communication Workers Union today (Tuesday) welcomes the Defra consultation on sentencing for dangerous dog offences and hopes that tougher and more consistent sentencing will be brought in.

The consultation runs from 6 August to 1 September 2013 and can be found online on the Defra website. CWU is encouraging all branches and affected members to participate as the results of the consultation will be used to inform the recommendations put forward in the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill.
Image
Dave Joyce on BBC News this morning (Tuesday)
Dave Joyce, CWU national health and safety officer, said: "Current sentencing arrangements do not match the serious nature of offences. 16 people have been killed in dog attacks since 2005 by dogs and a quarter of a million people are bitten by dogs in the UK every year, yet the maximum prison sentence is just two years and a £5,000 fine. Only one person has ever been imprisoned for a dog attack on a postal worker when the postman was nearly killed but the sentence was just four and a half months. As the number of dog attacks and number of fatalities continues to grow - sentencing must get tougher to deal with irresponsible, negligent dog owners."

CWU represents the largest number of dog attack victims - postal workers and telecom engineers who suffer 5,000 dog attacks each year. The union warmly welcomes the consultation and hopes that tougher sentencing arrangements will be part of the package of important dangerous dogs law changes later this year which includes extending the law to private property, introduction of Dog Control Notices, compulsory microchipping and extended police dog seizure powers.


"This consultation is very welcome and hopefully indicates the government is serious about tackling the problem of irresponsible dog ownership" said Dave. "We want to see tougher sentencing, better enforcement and greater consistency in sentencing. At the moment people are being handed vastly different sentences for very similar crimes, with one person receiving a suspended prison sentence while another walks away with just a £100 fine.

"Current arrangements are simply not good enough and the punishments do not fit the crimes. We would draw comparisons with driving offences where causing grievous bodily injury by dangerous or inconsiderate driving has a maximum prison sentence of five years and an unlimited fine plus automatic disqualification and causing death by dangerous driving has a maximum prison sentence of fourteen years. We want to see something similar for serious dangerous dog offences, given the devastating effect that dog attacks can have on peoples' lives. Irresponsible dog ownership causes injury and distress to thousands of our members, others workers, children and the public alike - it must be tackled."

CWU has been campaigning for changes to dangerous dogs laws since 2007. The union's Bite Back campaign has the support of major animal charities, enforcement agencies and businesses. During this time the campaign has resulted in dog control law changes in both Scotland and Northern Ireland, and Wales was about to legislate until Westminster brought forward these proposals earlier this year.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
masterblaster
Posts: 285
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 20:12
Gender: Male

Re: Sentencing for dogs offences should be tougher, says CWU

Post by masterblaster »

There should be a minimum sentence for allowing breeds covered in the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991, to be in public, unmuzzled or private property untethered and unmuzzled.
This act should also cover a wider range 'Dangerous' dogs.
It's too late for the victim of any dog attack after the event, a deterrent should have 'teeth' to deter, who believes anyone offender would actually get 'life'.
Dogs do reflect their owners personality, maybe introduce a license for owners to keep such animals.
DB1100
Posts: 1976
Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 14:30

Re: Sentencing for dogs offences should be tougher, says CWU

Post by DB1100 »

sgt,rock wrote:Define dangerous dog?? It's the yappy little things generally that bite you, the bigger dogs tend to come at you slower and you can fend them off with your trolley easier. I've been bitten 6 or 7 times now, never by one of these so called dangerous dogs.
Story in todays paper about a woman who was attacked by a policedog,in her own garden,would that be classed as a dangerous dog I wonder and the owner sent to prison?
http://www.sheffieldtelegraph.co.uk/new ... -1-5942354" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
For we were soldiers once,and young