ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Employee Shares Status

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
Red Robbo
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 680
Joined: 31 Jan 2012, 09:23
Gender: Male

Employee Shares Status

Post by Red Robbo »

My mate who is a solicitor told me that if I take up the share option being offered by Royal Mail I will lose my employment rights for un-fair dismissal, flexible working & redundancy payments, is this right ? :hmmmm :hmmmm
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Employee Shares Status

Post by DGP1 »

No. Maybe. Probably not.

It's complicated but it's unlikey, the rules apply to companies who give their employees shares to make them part of the company, ours will be given to us to sweeten us up and for us to say yes.
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
Red Robbo
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 680
Joined: 31 Jan 2012, 09:23
Gender: Male

Re: Employee Shares Status

Post by Red Robbo »

:thumbup Thanks DGP1, I will take the shares and carry on as normal.
gerardy
Posts: 315
Joined: 21 Feb 2009, 12:14
Gender: Male

Re: Employee Shares Status

Post by gerardy »

Just out of curiousity could someone with a bit of know please tell us:
Why is it that when ever RM talk about these potential shares via WTLL sessions and even their propaganda handouts - Why is there an opt out of these shares available for staff.
Why would they offer people the chance to turn turn down free shares unless there was some type of catch involved.
UnhappyGremlin
Posts: 2685
Joined: 18 May 2012, 20:49
Gender: Male
Location: Hiding

Re: Employee Shares Status

Post by UnhappyGremlin »

gerardy wrote:Just out of curiousity could someone with a bit of know please tell us:
Why is it that when ever RM talk about these potential shares via WTLL sessions and even their propaganda handouts - Why is there an opt out of these shares available for staff.
Why would they offer people the chance to turn turn down free shares unless there was some type of catch involved.
There is always an opt out. Probably a legal requirement of share issues like this.
You can't force people to accept shares, and say you're having them and that's it.
Some may decide to opt out in protest, it may go against their beliefs/conscience or whatever.
Sometimes, I wish I wasn't a Rep.
Red Robbo
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 680
Joined: 31 Jan 2012, 09:23
Gender: Male

Re: Employee Shares Status

Post by Red Robbo »

Funny you should ask that question my mate said I could opt out and keep my employment rights ? :hmmmm
alanmc
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 49
Joined: 21 Mar 2011, 15:16
Gender: Male

Re: Employee Shares Status

Post by alanmc »

hr, if u want to believe them are saying if shares are given to you ie no cost to you then this law doesn't apply :Boo hoo! :Boo hoo!
bb
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72548
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Employee Shares Status

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

alanpowell wrote:hr, if u want to believe them are saying if shares are given to you ie no cost to you then this law doesn't apply :Boo hoo! :Boo hoo!

and they are right. For us to come under the "rights for shares" legislation, then they HAVE to pay for anyone who wants independent legal advice (150,000 x £250 = £37,500,000 :left: ) and they have to give us a specific contract/legal paper that tells us what we are giving up. There are other hoops they have to jump through.

Now I agree we need a definitive answer from the Union, but after initial concern and some of my own research, I am satisfied we do not come under this new legislation. The Union, however, needs to cross the Ts and dot the Is to make sure.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Red Robbo
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 680
Joined: 31 Jan 2012, 09:23
Gender: Male

Re: Employee Shares Status

Post by Red Robbo »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
alanpowell wrote:hr, if u want to believe them are saying if shares are given to you ie no cost to you then this law doesn't apply :Boo hoo! :Boo hoo!

and they are right. For us to come under the "rights for shares" legislation, then they HAVE to pay for anyone who wants independent legal advice (150,000 x £250 = £37,500,000 :left: ) and they have to give us a specific contract/legal paper that tells us what we are giving up. There are other hoops they have to jump through.

Now I agree we need a definitive answer from the Union, but after initial concern and some of my own research, I am satisfied we do not come under this new legislation. The Union, however, needs to cross the Ts and dot the Is to make sure.
Cheers TrueblueTerrier, I have heard that the Union solicitors agree, we don't come under the new legislation,something coming out soon. :thumbup :thumbup