ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

MTSF2 After Privatisation

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
Budfrog
Posts: 893
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 02:19

MTSF2 After Privatisation

Post by Budfrog »

I was talking to a colleague yesterday who is taking VR when Stevenage MC closes.

He said that the MTSF2 agreement finishes in 2013 and that after that it is likely that any redundancies will be on the minimum terms that RM can get away with and it may even be the Govt minimum should they be compulsory. The onset of privatisation will mean that austere terms will be in place to minimise cost when employees leave.

Has anyone else heard of this?
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72548
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: MTSF2 After Privatisation

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Budfrog wrote:I was talking to a colleague yesterday who is taking VR when Stevenage MC closes.

He said that the MTSF2 agreement finishes in 2013 and that after that it is likely that any redundancies will be on the minimum terms that RM can get away with and it may even be the Govt minimum should they be compulsory. The onset of privatisation will mean that austere terms will be in place to minimise cost when employees leave.

Has anyone else heard of this?
Not heard official confirmation but its hardly unexpected. TBH I think most are worried about the T&C after privatisation and how TUPE will affect that. Also how T&Cs will be changed once we are no longer covered by TUPE. Hopefully the CWU/CMA have learnt from the CWUs mistakes over the Counters going to WHSmiths. I also hope that they brief reps and members as well, one thing we don't want is to go into privatisation without knowing exactly how it will affect all of us.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
vanman
Posts: 89
Joined: 21 May 2007, 09:12
Location: East Mids

Re: MTSF2 After Privatisation

Post by vanman »

Budfrog wrote:I was talking to a colleague yesterday who is taking VR when Stevenage MC closes.

He said that the MTSF2 agreement finishes in 2013 and that after that it is likely that any redundancies will be on the minimum terms that RM can get away with and it may even be the Govt minimum should they be compulsory. The onset of privatisation will mean that austere terms will be in place to minimise cost when employees leave.

Has anyone else heard of this?
I think you are mistaken about MTSF finishing - there seems to be a popular view that MTSF is due to finish in 2013, but I've not seen any proof of it yet.

The BT 2010 agreement introduced a couple of changes to MTSF, first the payment of ETE for 5 years (in certain cases) not 3 and secondly the removal of the two year cost cap for redundancies (which can affect those aged over 55).

The BT2010 agreement says that both these changes only last till 2013. It also says these changes will be reviewed late in 2012.

I have yet to see anything that says MTSF itself finishes in 2013.

As for what may happen post privatization - your guess is as good as mine, I would expect all agreements to remain, until Royal Mail wants to re-negotiate them, the same as now.

I suppose the future of MTSF is likely to be discussed as part of the talks that were announced last week on the business plan etc.
belle smith
Posts: 1557
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 17:41
Gender: Male
Location: scotland

Re: MTSF2 After Privatisation

Post by belle smith »

vanman wrote:The BT 2010 agreement introduced a couple of changes to MTSF, first the payment of ETE for 5 years (in certain cases) not 3 and secondly the removal of the two year cost cap for redundancies (which can affect those aged over 55).

The BT2010 agreement says that both these changes only last till 2013. It also says these changes will be reviewed late in 2012.
How optomistic are you about that review?
vanman
Posts: 89
Joined: 21 May 2007, 09:12
Location: East Mids

Re: MTSF2 After Privatisation

Post by vanman »

Belle,

Your guess is as good as mine as to what the outcome of any review will bring.

However, I do believe that RM needs MTSF (or something very similar), to be able to make the changes to the business it wants.

Time will tell.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72548
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: MTSF2 After Privatisation

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

vanman wrote:Belle,

Your guess is as good as mine as to what the outcome of any review will bring.

However, I do believe that RM needs MTSF (or something very similar), to be able to make the changes to the business it wants.

Time will tell.
I agree with you vanman the level of changes that RM want to bring in they really need to to have the work force with them, and MTSF and its benefits along with other "benefits" all would help in this.

However, we all know how high handed RM are and already they are erroding the perceived benefits of being a postie, and as a result they are losing the goodwill of the ordinary workers. Its not a trend I can see being reversed anytime soon. :nervous :nervous :nervous :nervous
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.