ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Privatisation and The IB

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
Lager Chimp
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 46
Joined: 11 Jul 2007, 15:17
Gender: Male

Privatisation and The IB

Post by Lager Chimp »

Would there be any need for them if RM is privatised? How many other private delivery firms have a 'secret police force'?

We'll no longer be charged with the edict of protecting the Queen's mail, as it won't be hers anymore.
Change is inevitable. Except from a vending machine.
Stormproof
Posts: 6116
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
Gender: Female

Re: Privatisation and The IB

Post by Stormproof »

Will the Official Secrets Act still be applicable if we arn't working for the government?
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets


Illegitimi non carborundum
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72545
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Privatisation and The IB

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Lager Chimp wrote:Would there be any need for them if RM is privatised? How many other private delivery firms have a 'secret police force'?

We'll no longer be charged with the edict of protecting the Queen's mail, as it won't be hers anymore.
Guessing here


Yes but they would be outside and independent of RM and probably become a government police force - like the MOD Plods, or absorbed into the proposed national police force FBI style.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72545
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Privatisation and The IB

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Stormproof wrote:Will the Official Secrets Act still be applicable if we arn't working for the government?
For those who have already signed it yes it would still apply as I believe that signing the OSA is a life long obligation.

For new starters, and those already serving I think we would have to sign a non disclosure clause in a reworded contract.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
fmrPOSTIE
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 674
Joined: 29 Oct 2008, 20:52
Gender: Male

Re: Privatisation and The IB

Post by fmrPOSTIE »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
Stormproof wrote:Will the Official Secrets Act still be applicable if we arn't working for the government?
For those who have already signed it yes it would still apply as I believe that signing the OSA is a life long obligation.

For new starters, and those already serving I think we would have to sign a non disclosure clause in a reworded contract.
Any company can be required to sign the Official Secrets Act, it doesnt have to be owned by the Govt.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Privatisation and The IB

Post by fishtank »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
Stormproof wrote:Will the Official Secrets Act still be applicable if we arn't working for the government?
For those who have already signed it yes it would still apply as I believe that signing the OSA is a life long obligation.

For new starters, and those already serving I think we would have to sign a non disclosure clause in a reworded contract.
Signing the Official Secrets Act is simply a reminder...the Act itself is LAW and everyone whether they sign it or not is covered by it.
What you sign when you start with Royal Mail is simply a statement saying that you have read and understood the parts of the Act pertaining to the work you do for the business.
Thousands do this in both private and public companies from directors right up to cleaners. :chuckle
That won't change after privatisation.
You can sign it more than once....i signed a more full-on version in a previous life and then signed the shortened,more RM specific version when i joined Royal Mail.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Privatisation and The IB

Post by dvbuk55 »

fishtank wrote:
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
Stormproof wrote:Will the Official Secrets Act still be applicable if we arn't working for the government?
For those who have already signed it yes it would still apply as I believe that signing the OSA is a life long obligation.

For new starters, and those already serving I think we would have to sign a non disclosure clause in a reworded contract.
Signing the Official Secrets Act is simply a reminder...the Act itself is LAW and everyone whether they sign it or not is covered by it.
What you sign when you start with Royal Mail is simply a statement saying that you have read and understood the parts of the Act pertaining to the work you do for the business.
Thousands do this in both private and public companies from directors right up to cleaners. :chuckle
That won't change after privatisation.
You can sign it more than once....i signed a more full-on version in a previous life and then signed the shortened,more RM specific version when i joined Royal Mail.
I knew it ft, you were the Scarlet Pimperknuckle weren't you? :chuckle
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Privatisation and The IB

Post by fishtank »

dvbuk55 wrote: I knew it ft, you were the Scarlet Pimperknuckle weren't you? :chuckle
I could tell you but then i'd have to kill you and your avatar...and i couldn't bring myself to kill a dumb animal...or his avatar. :chuckle
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16469
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Privatisation and The IB

Post by clashcityrocker »

I see we can add lager chimp's avatar to the list killed by Postman. (top of page)
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Privatisation and The IB

Post by dvbuk55 »

fishtank wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote: I knew it ft, you were the Scarlet Pimperknuckle weren't you? :chuckle
I could tell you but then i'd have to kill you and your avatar...and i couldn't bring myself to kill a dumb animal...or his avatar. :chuckle
Well you got that right - he's smarter than me :chuckle
axeman
Posts: 1733
Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 17:57

Re: Privatisation and The IB

Post by axeman »

fmrPOSTIE wrote:
TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
Stormproof wrote:Will the Official Secrets Act still be applicable if we arn't working for the government?
For those who have already signed it yes it would still apply as I believe that signing the OSA is a life long obligation.

For new starters, and those already serving I think we would have to sign a non disclosure clause in a reworded contract.
Any company can be required to sign the Official Secrets Act, it doesnt have to be owned by the Govt.

Not quite the right answer and slightly missleading you only are required to sign if it is deemed to be ''i'd say a government dept, or of national security'' only companys involved in the military supplies etc. If others handling mail are not required to sign it then this outdated practise will be phased out
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Privatisation and The IB

Post by fishtank »

That's not the case axeman.
I've personally seen brickies,plasterers,painters,cleaners and all sorts having to sign the statement.
As i said earlier it's just a reminder of an obligation that everyone has under the Official Secrets Act.
The fact that you have signed it simply means that you have read and understood those obligations which makes a prosecution under the Act a great deal easier....the actual LAW doesn't apply to you any differently than any other guy in the street.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
axeman
Posts: 1733
Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 17:57

Re: Privatisation and The IB

Post by axeman »

fish mate i have been around for many a year and unless they are working on government property or the likes of say telecoms engineers , builders etc working in a government building like an embasy then i havent seen or know of any that have had to sign it and i do know many builders and people who work in and around embasy buildings , government contractors etc....and those who don't . :wave