ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Privatisation and The IB
-
Lager Chimp
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 46
- Joined: 11 Jul 2007, 15:17
- Gender: Male
Privatisation and The IB
Would there be any need for them if RM is privatised? How many other private delivery firms have a 'secret police force'?
We'll no longer be charged with the edict of protecting the Queen's mail, as it won't be hers anymore.
We'll no longer be charged with the edict of protecting the Queen's mail, as it won't be hers anymore.
Change is inevitable. Except from a vending machine.
-
Stormproof
- Posts: 6116
- Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
- Gender: Female
Re: Privatisation and The IB
Will the Official Secrets Act still be applicable if we arn't working for the government?
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72545
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: Privatisation and The IB
Guessing hereLager Chimp wrote:Would there be any need for them if RM is privatised? How many other private delivery firms have a 'secret police force'?
We'll no longer be charged with the edict of protecting the Queen's mail, as it won't be hers anymore.
Yes but they would be outside and independent of RM and probably become a government police force - like the MOD Plods, or absorbed into the proposed national police force FBI style.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72545
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Re: Privatisation and The IB
For those who have already signed it yes it would still apply as I believe that signing the OSA is a life long obligation.Stormproof wrote:Will the Official Secrets Act still be applicable if we arn't working for the government?
For new starters, and those already serving I think we would have to sign a non disclosure clause in a reworded contract.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
fmrPOSTIE
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 674
- Joined: 29 Oct 2008, 20:52
- Gender: Male
Re: Privatisation and The IB
Any company can be required to sign the Official Secrets Act, it doesnt have to be owned by the Govt.TrueBlueTerrier wrote:For those who have already signed it yes it would still apply as I believe that signing the OSA is a life long obligation.Stormproof wrote:Will the Official Secrets Act still be applicable if we arn't working for the government?
For new starters, and those already serving I think we would have to sign a non disclosure clause in a reworded contract.
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: Privatisation and The IB
Signing the Official Secrets Act is simply a reminder...the Act itself is LAW and everyone whether they sign it or not is covered by it.TrueBlueTerrier wrote:For those who have already signed it yes it would still apply as I believe that signing the OSA is a life long obligation.Stormproof wrote:Will the Official Secrets Act still be applicable if we arn't working for the government?
For new starters, and those already serving I think we would have to sign a non disclosure clause in a reworded contract.
What you sign when you start with Royal Mail is simply a statement saying that you have read and understood the parts of the Act pertaining to the work you do for the business.
Thousands do this in both private and public companies from directors right up to cleaners.
That won't change after privatisation.
You can sign it more than once....i signed a more full-on version in a previous life and then signed the shortened,more RM specific version when i joined Royal Mail.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: Privatisation and The IB
I knew it ft, you were the Scarlet Pimperknuckle weren't you?fishtank wrote:Signing the Official Secrets Act is simply a reminder...the Act itself is LAW and everyone whether they sign it or not is covered by it.TrueBlueTerrier wrote:For those who have already signed it yes it would still apply as I believe that signing the OSA is a life long obligation.Stormproof wrote:Will the Official Secrets Act still be applicable if we arn't working for the government?
For new starters, and those already serving I think we would have to sign a non disclosure clause in a reworded contract.
What you sign when you start with Royal Mail is simply a statement saying that you have read and understood the parts of the Act pertaining to the work you do for the business.
Thousands do this in both private and public companies from directors right up to cleaners.![]()
That won't change after privatisation.
You can sign it more than once....i signed a more full-on version in a previous life and then signed the shortened,more RM specific version when i joined Royal Mail.
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: Privatisation and The IB
I could tell you but then i'd have to kill you and your avatar...and i couldn't bring myself to kill a dumb animal...or his avatar.dvbuk55 wrote: I knew it ft, you were the Scarlet Pimperknuckle weren't you?
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16469
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: Privatisation and The IB
I see we can add lager chimp's avatar to the list killed by Postman. (top of page)
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: Privatisation and The IB
Well you got that right - he's smarter than mefishtank wrote:I could tell you but then i'd have to kill you and your avatar...and i couldn't bring myself to kill a dumb animal...or his avatar.dvbuk55 wrote: I knew it ft, you were the Scarlet Pimperknuckle weren't you?
-
axeman
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 17:57
Re: Privatisation and The IB
fmrPOSTIE wrote:Any company can be required to sign the Official Secrets Act, it doesnt have to be owned by the Govt.TrueBlueTerrier wrote:For those who have already signed it yes it would still apply as I believe that signing the OSA is a life long obligation.Stormproof wrote:Will the Official Secrets Act still be applicable if we arn't working for the government?
For new starters, and those already serving I think we would have to sign a non disclosure clause in a reworded contract.
Not quite the right answer and slightly missleading you only are required to sign if it is deemed to be ''i'd say a government dept, or of national security'' only companys involved in the military supplies etc. If others handling mail are not required to sign it then this outdated practise will be phased out
-
fishtank
- Posts: 19732
- Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
- Gender: Male
Re: Privatisation and The IB
That's not the case axeman.
I've personally seen brickies,plasterers,painters,cleaners and all sorts having to sign the statement.
As i said earlier it's just a reminder of an obligation that everyone has under the Official Secrets Act.
The fact that you have signed it simply means that you have read and understood those obligations which makes a prosecution under the Act a great deal easier....the actual LAW doesn't apply to you any differently than any other guy in the street.
I've personally seen brickies,plasterers,painters,cleaners and all sorts having to sign the statement.
As i said earlier it's just a reminder of an obligation that everyone has under the Official Secrets Act.
The fact that you have signed it simply means that you have read and understood those obligations which makes a prosecution under the Act a great deal easier....the actual LAW doesn't apply to you any differently than any other guy in the street.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
-
axeman
- Posts: 1733
- Joined: 12 Jun 2007, 17:57
Re: Privatisation and The IB
fish mate i have been around for many a year and unless they are working on government property or the likes of say telecoms engineers , builders etc working in a government building like an embasy then i havent seen or know of any that have had to sign it and i do know many builders and people who work in and around embasy buildings , government contractors etc....and those who don't . 