ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

This year?

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
Drake
Posts: 16
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 19:27
Gender: Male

This year?

Post by Drake »

I'm a bit confused here :confused if the coalition want to have legislation by next month, does that mean we'll be privatised this year?
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: This year?

Post by k979aaa »

They need a vote first so hang on this is going to be one rocky ride for camamoran and nick pleb!.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: This year?

Post by Big Daz »

Its a long winded process unless its fast tracked

The lords and MP's will want to debate this at length.

Change of ownership if Cable and Davey succeed will take place next year.
Drake
Posts: 16
Joined: 10 Sep 2010, 19:27
Gender: Male

Re: This year?

Post by Drake »

That's the thing ....... they give the impression they want to fast track it!
Wild Rover
Posts: 614
Joined: 03 Aug 2007, 17:41
Location: Jockistan

Re: This year?

Post by Wild Rover »

Is 2010 and Beyond part of the selling off deal :confused I mean, nobody in their right mind would buy into that, yeah??......







...........except the money grabbing b@stards who didn't vote NO :no no - you have a lot to answer for :evil/mad
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: This year?

Post by Big Daz »

Perhaps some voted yes because they decided to place their trust and faith in Dave Ward and his team and WILL be expecting them to deliver on their fine words.

I really dont think the money was good enough to be the sole motivating factor.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: This year?

Post by Big Daz »

Drake wrote:That's the thing ....... they give the impression they want to fast track it!

Even if they do they wont get the actuall change in ownership untill next year.

The previous governmnet left the current government a ready made postal services bill, all it needs is a bit of tweaking and hey presto the government are ready to rock and roll.

The house of lords debated the PSB last year and it passed all the way through, so it wont take too long for a new PSB to work its way through as it will be very similar to the previous one.

Well done Liebour, youve made it easier for RM to be sold off :d'oh!
Cut Off King
Posts: 1078
Joined: 23 Jun 2009, 21:18
Gender: Female

Re: This year?

Post by Cut Off King »

Big Daz wrote:Perhaps some voted yes because they decided to place their trust and faith in Dave Ward and his team and WILL be expecting them to deliver on their fine words.

I really dont think the money was good enough to be the sole motivating factor.
"Blind faith" & "misplaced trust" spring to mind.
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: This year?

Post by DirtyHarry »

Big Daz wrote:Perhaps some voted yes because they decided to place their trust and faith in Dave Ward and his team and WILL be expecting them to deliver on their fine words.

I really dont think the money was good enough to be the sole motivating factor.
Dave Ward and his team? Expecting those idiots to deliver on their fine words? Money wasn't good enough to be the sole motivating factor?
Dave Ward and his team of morons have stitched us up good and proper. The only outcome for posties from the travesty that is "2010 & beyond," is a more difficult job with poorer conditions to match, the real aspirations held by the vast majority of postal workers with a modicum of sanity, will not be met in any way, shape, or form.
As for the money dangled like a carrot for donkeys to lap up, I know some colleagues that would sell themselves a lot shorter than that, given half a chance. :cuppa
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72545
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: This year?

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Big Daz wrote:I really dont think the money was good enough to be the sole motivating factor.
If they were sensible enough to track down a copy of the agreement and read it I would agree with you the "bung" was not good enough. Unfortunately, with the CWU not sending out a copy and strongly recommending the deal with the ballot papers most focussed on the "financial" rewards. Only now are some realising that the windfall was a Pyrrhic one.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.