ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Royal Mail told to prepare for sell-off

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72545
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Royal Mail told to prepare for sell-off

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/b ... 131801.ece" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The sell-off of Royal Mail has been revived by the coalition government, which has signalled it is looking for an “injection of private capital” into the state-owned postal provider.

The announcement came as Royal Mail announced that it had shrugged off last winter’s strikes and the long-term fall in mail volumes to post a 26 per cent rise in operating profits to £404 million.

The decision by the Conservative-led government to press on with a part-privatisation of Royal Mail will raise tensions not only with staff and the Communications Workers Union (CWU) but also among some Liberal Democrat MPs.

The Conservatives have previously backed the sale of a 49 per cent stake in Royal Mail, which could attract private equity investors. It seems likely that the European parcels business, its most successful operation in recent years, will also go up for auction.

The future of Royal Mail remains uncertain, though, because no solution has yet been found to plug its £10 billion pension fund deficit.

Royal Mail said that its improvement in profits in the year to the end of March came despite falling mail volumes — it handled 13 million fewer letters last year, down more than 7 per cent.

More than a third of letters posted in Britain, including the bulk postal needs of banks and utilities, are now handled by private competitors.

Customers are also switching to electronic forms of communication, such as texting and e-mails, while others have opted to use the cheaper second-class mail.

These factors sent Royal Mail revenues down more than 2 per cent to £9.3 billion, the first fall in sales for a decade.

The rise in profits was due to cost-cutting measures which led to 8,000 jobs being lost in the past year — all through voluntary means, according to Royal Mail.

The business spent £10 million a week, totalling £517 million over the 12 months, as it invested in new sorting technology, improving post offices and honouring its funding commitments to its pension schemes.

“These are good results achieved against a backdrop of harsh economic conditions and the relentless reduction in the number of letters sent by customers, not just in the UK but around the world,” Donald Brydon, chairman of Royal Mail, said.

“Huge challenges remain, including the need to find a resolution to our historic pension deficit and the need to reach agreement with Postcomm [the industry regulator] on a regulatory regime more suited to today’s changing marketplace.”

Mr Brydon said that strikes by the CWU last year over pay and working conditions “clearly had an adverse effect” but that the subsequent deal with the union would mean “further progress towards our modernisation goals and help us to protect the universal service while providing a fair reward for our people”.

Royal Mail letters doubled their profits to £121 million but operating earnings for the European parcels business, General Logistics Systems, fell 10 per cent to £112 million, blamed on economic contraction in Germany.

Profits at the Post Office increased by 75 per cent to £72 million partly due to a rebranding as the people’s Post Office. Parcelforce, the time-guaranteed delivery operation, increased its profits by £5 million to £17 million.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Broxi51
Posts: 1154
Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 19:04
Location: Scotland

Re: Royal Mail told to prepare for sell-off

Post by Broxi51 »

Did the tories or the lib dems not say in their election manifesto that referendums would be held for all decisions that are in the public interest?
The time has come to stop turning the other cheek, time to stop shaking our heads in bitter dismay, time to stop mumbling our angry words.
The time has come for union.
sevenandseven
Posts: 162
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 16:12

Re: Royal Mail told to prepare for sell-off

Post by sevenandseven »

More than a third of letters posted in Britain, including the bulk postal needs of banks and utilities, are now handled by private competitors.
And largely delivered by Royal Mail!

Are journalists the most ill informed and lazy people in the world?
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Royal Mail told to prepare for sell-off

Post by DirtyHarry »

sevenandseven wrote:
Are journalists the most ill informed and lazy people in the world?
In a nutshell, yes.
balintober
Posts: 11
Joined: 08 Jun 2009, 13:08
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail told to prepare for sell-off

Post by balintober »

it was just on sky news, private equity firm CVC has revived its interest in buying a third of Royal Mail.
I think these are the same lot that Mandy pandy tried to hawk us off to.
Stormproof
Posts: 6116
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
Gender: Female

Re: Royal Mail told to prepare for sell-off

Post by Stormproof »

CVC bought out the AA then sold most of the assets off/made 1000's of people redundant. They also own Saga and by all accounts have ruined that firm aswell.
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets


Illegitimi non carborundum
montriff
Posts: 243
Joined: 24 Feb 2009, 17:37
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail told to prepare for sell-off

Post by montriff »

sevenandseven wrote:
More than a third of letters posted in Britain, including the bulk postal needs of banks and utilities, are now handled by private competitors.
And largely delivered by Royal Mail!

Are journalists the most ill informed and lazy people in the world?
looking at my fittimg every morning i would say its a lot more than a third :confused
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Royal Mail told to prepare for sell-off

Post by DGP1 »

I think we'll need some of this :nervous
Image

Dara O'Briain seems like who we could use to fight our corner :chuckle
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
meercat
Posts: 814
Joined: 21 Apr 2010, 16:15
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail told to prepare for sell-off

Post by meercat »

CVC's experience in the European postal market dates back to 2005, when it bought a 22% stake in Post Danmark from the Danish government. It later teamed up with Post Danmark to acquire half of the Belgian post office. Last year Post Danmark was merged with the Swedish post office, Posten, giving CVC a minority stake in the new combined company based in Stockholm.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009 ... ate-equity" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
uprising95
Posts: 321
Joined: 30 Aug 2008, 12:44
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail told to prepare for sell-off

Post by uprising95 »

what would this mean though if it got part privatised .
i thought it was obviously that everyone wanted it to stay in the public.


i dont understand.
can anyone explain please.
Heavy Bags Or What
smokerjim
Posts: 1921
Joined: 13 Jun 2007, 22:27
Gender: Male
Location: In a corner, thinking "I've picked a bad week to give up smoking..."

Re: Royal Mail told to prepare for sell-off

Post by smokerjim »

uprising95 wrote:what would this mean though if it got part privatised .
i thought it was obviously that everyone wanted it to stay in the public.


i dont understand.
can anyone explain please.
Everyone does want it to stay public....except those with a vested intrest ( such as people able to get subtle backhanders, the ability for "insider trading" of the tendering process or just those that want an easy directorship, with a fat sack of cash, huge bonuses and sod all work ) not that such people exist in this Govt or it's predecessors - perish the thought.
I don't suppose your mouth bleeds every 28 days, does it?

Mail delivery; those that can, do, those that can't, MANAGE!