ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Royal mail - The case for Partnership

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72545
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Royal mail - The case for Partnership

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://nds.coi.gov.uk/environment/fullD ... tment=True" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (National)

Royal mail - The case for Partnership

The Government today reinforced its message that a strategic partnership can, and will, help to deliver a transformed Royal Mail and that proceeds from the proposed transaction will be used to fund modernisation, as it published its response to the Business and Enterprise Select Committee's report on the Postal Services Bill.

Postal Services Minister Pat McFadden said:

"The measures the Government proposes can deliver our objectives, which are to put a publicly owned Royal Mail on a clear path to modernisation and, in so doing, to secure the future of the universal postal service which the Hooper report said was under threat.

"Royal Mail faces a stark choice about its future, to modernise or decline as mail volumes drop because of the shift to e-mail and text messaging. The Government has put forward proposals that offer Royal Mail the opportunity to survive in this new communications age, as well as respond to its customers' changing needs."

Government welcomed the Committee's support for the majority of the Government's analysis and proposals, including that the status quo is not an option; clear recognition that Royal Mail Group is 'significantly less efficient than its competitors'; both management and unions must change; and that the Government's proposed measures in respect of regulation and historic pensions' liabilities are important elements of a solution.

The Government rejected the Committee's view that it should put a precise figure on modernisation.

Mr McFadden said:

"Modernisation is not a one-off event, nor simply about the purchase of some new machines. It must be an ongoing process in a fast changing commercial environment. The cost of modernisation will depend on the business plan agreed with any partner, how far reforms are taken, the speed of implementation, and the extent to which the Royal Mail seeks to become a leader in the communications market.

"Given Royal Mail's falling revenues and limited profits over the next few years, and pensions fund deficit, clearly Royal Mail will not be able to fund this investment alone. Additional capital will be required and this could be hundreds of millions of pounds, in addition to the funding we have already provided. And as well as capital, there is a need to transform Royal Mail in order to preserve the universal service which is at the heart of our postal system."

The Government has made a number of moves to respond to some of the concerns raised by the Committee. This includes an amendment to impose a new duty on Post Office Ltd to provide an annual report on the Post Office network and its accessibility to consumers, particularly the most vulnerable, throughout the UK.

The Government understands that the Select Committee is keen to see more information about the commercial process. The Secretary of State has committed to keep Parliament informed about important developments as the partnership negotiations progress and to report to Parliament. A Government assessment of the alternatives to partnership will be published before the Commons stages of the Bill.


Client ref 2009/153

COI ref 173814P
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
pinstripe
Posts: 2464
Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
Gender: Male
Location: 2 left turns from reality

Re: Royal mail - The case for Partnership

Post by pinstripe »

Why has no-one asked how much the 'Strategic Partner' will cream off from the profits EVERY YEAR?
Why do they keep going on about falling mail volumes and then say it is due to e-mail and texting?
When did you last receive a gas bill by text?
When did you last receive a parcel by e-mail? Why are they so full of s***?
So many questions.....
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Re: Royal mail - The case for Partnership

Post by BELIAL »

Ah the old e-mail bullshit. Can't find one single study to back up the e-substitution claim.Until recently RM trainers were gleefully announcing that far from eroding business,e-traffic was generating more work :roll:
Bit like urban myths really keep saying it and it gets accepted with zero evidence.
The postal service would have been declared dead and buried if Mandy could have made a buck and was around when the telephone was invented :chuckle :chuckle
Bye