Crozier writes to MP's

tommymac · Post by **tommymac** » 15 Jun 2007, 22:10

.

How's things Tommy.

Fine Postman just fine. Everybody still on the vans and moral still high.

L Tommo · Post by **L Tommo** » 15 Jun 2007, 22:22

Carry on the great work and effort to make a stand!!!

SLINGS AND ARROWS...

BUT WE SHALL STAND TALL...

DONT LET THE BASTARDS GRIND US DOWN!!!!

OUT

grogoreo · Post by **grogoreo** » 16 Jun 2007, 00:03

IWW Fellow Worker wrote:He who pays the piper calls the tune and one of Labour's backers is Rupert Murdoch of The Scum. If there was the slightest hint of socialism about Labour, Murdoch wouldn't touch it. I remember Peter Hain in his days with the Young Liberals when he was such a pain in the arse to the establishment, they tried to fit him up on a robbery charge. He then joined Labour and quietened down. Ten years ago he (and Bill Morris) said they would support the Liverpool Dockers, but backed down as the election approached. Alan Johnson was never anything other than a self-interested liberal. We thought Tuffin was bad, but Johnson was no friend of ours. But Labour has never been a socialist party.

Plus the fact even if Labour had socialist leanings it is still a capitalist party so will always defend capital before workers.

IWW Fellow Worker · Post by **IWW Fellow Worker** » 16 Jun 2007, 13:39

grogoreo wrote:
IWW Fellow Worker wrote:He who pays the piper calls the tune and one of Labour's backers is Rupert Murdoch of The Scum. If there was the slightest hint of socialism about Labour, Murdoch wouldn't touch it. I remember Peter Hain in his days with the Young Liberals when he was such a pain in the arse to the establishment, they tried to fit him up on a robbery charge. He then joined Labour and quietened down. Ten years ago he (and Bill Morris) said they would support the Liverpool Dockers, but backed down as the election approached. Alan Johnson was never anything other than a self-interested liberal. We thought Tuffin was bad, but Johnson was no friend of ours. But Labour has never been a socialist party.
Plus the fact even if Labour had socialist leanings it is still a capitalist party so will always defend capital before workers.

So true. And that's why public schoolboys like Blair join.

BB brother · Post by **BB brother** » 16 Jun 2007, 15:11

Lets hope the MPs are switched on enough not to believe this one sided nonsense.
Not content with trying to undermine public support hes now trying to undermine support from MPs( If we have any!)

This is disgracefull behaviour from Mr Crozier, hes pissin off an awful lot of his employees !

ROCKY · Post by **ROCKY** » 16 Jun 2007, 15:27

all well and good folks we can chat all day but what are hq doing to win this spin war ive heard nothing yet apart from what they send us and that is preaching to the converted,this battle is not going to be won by strikes but by wide felt public oponion,when the 10pm news is doing headlines on the true facts of the string deal then we will have the juice to win because those two arent going to have many friends cueing up to get egg on their faces

cruisey · Post by **cruisey** » 16 Jun 2007, 15:51

THE LATEST CWU RELEASE SAYS THE UNION ARE EMBARKING ON A PUBLIC CAMPAIGN. SENT AN EMAIL TO DAVE WARD ASKING THE NEXT STEPS FROM THE UNION. HE REPLIED SAYING THEY'RE TALKING TO MP'S AND THE GOVERNMENT AND HE'S FORWARDING THE LETTER SENT TO LEIGHTON TO THE PRESS. QUESTION IS, WILL THE PRESS PRINT IT ALL OR JUST CHOICE CUTS.

Geordie · Post by **Geordie** » 16 Jun 2007, 17:59

Don't forget that Murdoch owns half the press (and Sky), and Leighton sits on his board, News International.

Who do you think will win the press war, Leighton or HQ???

robmacca · Post by **robmacca** » 16 Jun 2007, 22:58

With a letter like that - Adam and Allan will make typical MP's, should they ever choose a new career!

DirtyHarry · Post by **DirtyHarry** » 17 Jun 2007, 12:51

Crozier can send propaganda out to anybody he likes , it still won't alter the fact that without postalworkers there's
no postal network in this or any country. If he doesn't want trouble, he knows what he must do. TREAT US FAIRLY.

That message should be enough for both parliament, and the general public.

mdtomuk · Post by **mdtomuk** » 17 Jun 2007, 19:24

HI GUYS, CHECK OUT THE 'RM SENDS FOR MEDIATORS' THREAD. THEY ARE BEGINNING TO CRACK!

:cfo :lfo

DirtyHarry · Post by **DirtyHarry** » 17 Jun 2007, 20:23

mdtomuk wrote:HI GUYS, CHECK OUT THE 'RM SENDS FOR MEDIATORS' THREAD. THEY ARE BEGINNING TO CRACK!

:cfo :lfo

It was always going to be just a matter of time, mate. But let's stay on our guard , I wouldn't be
surprised to find out :lfo & :cfo have shares in ACASS !!!

vigilante · Post by **vigilante** » 17 Jun 2007, 21:36

crozier??
hang on!!
who the f**k are you!
you done 20 or more years in this effin job have you
football boy?
stick to what you dont know.
Stop using this 27%, where the f**k do you get it from.
let's not waste words on these tw**ts.
if we have to strike then ok, then afterwards dont use cars etc in fact work to rule!!!
dont let the bitches get away with it.
staff are getting more wound up day by day.

norbet colon · Post by **norbet colon** » 18 Jun 2007, 23:36

POSTMAN wrote:Too many f***ing lies to list them all,what a f***ing p***k! :cfo

patronising lecturing, tone of it all, American Union bashing misinformation style, he is sulky isn't he :cfo

Broxi · Post by **Broxi** » 20 Jun 2007, 12:07

terrace wrote:Get the CWU to write to the MP's and state our case and put pressure on CWU sponsored MP's for that's what their job is otherwise why are the union sponsoring them.

Who are the 'union sponsored' MP's? I've had a look but I can't find anything about it on the CWU website or theyworkforyou.com which gives MP's expenses etc. There's bound to be one representing a Scottish seat that I can write to!

ROYALMAILCHAT

Crozier writes to MP's

GOOD FOR YOU BURSLEM!!!

Crozier Letter

- MEDIATION -

Re: - MEDIATION -

crozier