ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
funkflex55
Posts: 757
Joined: 04 Sep 2022, 22:58
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by funkflex55 »

https://www.internationaldistributionse ... eliveries/

Bottom of this page there is a go live update. Gives details of all offices regarding DM26. I've read online comments that nearby offices have been forced to send staff to DM26 offices so probably yes you're correct Mr Rush. However, as stated above there are DM26 offices on the list too. 186 and it's only f***ing September, just what are RM doing to the service.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12140
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by SpacePhoenix »

Locally just about every big DO has now gone over to DM26
Clappedoutpostie
Posts: 1260
Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by Clappedoutpostie »

funkflex55 wrote:
Yesterday, 07:13
https://www.internationaldistributionse ... eliveries/

Bottom of this page there is a go live update. Gives details of all offices regarding DM26. I've read online comments that nearby offices have been forced to send staff to DM26 offices so probably yes you're correct Mr Rush. However, as stated above there are DM26 offices on the list too. 186 and it's only f***ing September, just what are RM doing to the service.
And what a mess that list is with no sort of order or anything to it. Guess I shouldn’t be surprised.
ted_e_bear
Posts: 4085
Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by ted_e_bear »

Clappedoutpostie wrote:
Yesterday, 09:05
funkflex55 wrote:
Yesterday, 07:13
https://www.internationaldistributionse ... eliveries/

Bottom of this page there is a go live update. Gives details of all offices regarding DM26. I've read online comments that nearby offices have been forced to send staff to DM26 offices so probably yes you're correct Mr Rush. However, as stated above there are DM26 offices on the list too. 186 and it's only f***ing September, just what are RM doing to the service.
And what a mess that list is with no sort of order or anything to it. Guess I shouldn’t be surprised.
It's in order of the offices going live
Chelseablue
Posts: 2214
Joined: 19 Aug 2013, 14:33
Gender: Female

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by Chelseablue »

Throwing ot at dm26. Does that not defeat purpose ? Imagine if we all said , no thanks to ot for a while anyway !
Barnacle
Posts: 2909
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by Barnacle »

Chelseablue wrote:
Yesterday, 10:50
Throwing ot at dm26. Does that not defeat purpose ? Imagine if we all said , no thanks to ot for a while anyway !
We should all do no overtime for a week. Scare the bejesus out of them.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
A2B
Posts: 2012
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 19:34
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by A2B »

Barnacle wrote:
Yesterday, 14:15
Chelseablue wrote:
Yesterday, 10:50
Throwing ot at dm26. Does that not defeat purpose ? Imagine if we all said , no thanks to ot for a while anyway !
We should all do no overtime for a week. Scare the bejesus out of them.
There will be a comment soon saying you're not allowed to refuse overtime :arrrghhh
ted_e_bear
Posts: 4085
Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by ted_e_bear »

A2B wrote:
Yesterday, 14:27
Barnacle wrote:
Yesterday, 14:15
Chelseablue wrote:
Yesterday, 10:50
Throwing ot at dm26. Does that not defeat purpose ? Imagine if we all said , no thanks to ot for a while anyway !
We should all do no overtime for a week. Scare the bejesus out of them.
There will be a comment soon saying you're not allowed to refuse overtime :arrrghhh
And I predict that same person will say it's classed as industrial action 😂 😂
A2B
Posts: 2012
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 19:34
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by A2B »

ted_e_bear wrote:
Yesterday, 14:39

And I predict that same person will say it's classed as industrial action 😂 😂
Don't you know it :crazy:
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32756
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by POSTMAN »

We're sorry for any inconvenience and thank you for your understanding. We will regularly update customers on the offices most impacted here:

221

Aboyne SUDO (AB34)
Altens DO (AB10-AB12, AB35)
Andover DO (SP9, SP10, SP11)
Arbroath DO (DD11)
Ashington DO (NE22, NE62, NE63, NE64)
Banbury DO (OX15, OX16, OX17)
Barry DO (CF62, CF63)
Basingstoke DO (RG21-RG26, and RG28)
Bedford MK40 DO (MK40-MK45)
Belfast East DO (BT4, BT5, BT6, BT16)
Belfast South and Central DO (BT1, BT2, BT3, BT7, BT8, BT9)
Bicester DO (OX25-OX27)
Blaydon On Tyne DO (NE16, NE21, NE39, NE40)
Brentwood DO (CM13, CM14, CM15)
Bridge of Don DO (AB22, AB23)
Carmarthen DO (SA17, SA31-SA33)
Cambridge DO (CB1-CB5, CB21-CB25)
Canvey Island DO (SS8)
Carterton DO (OX18)
Castlewellan SPDO (BT31)
Cheadle SK DO (SK8)
Cheddar DO (BS27)
Chester DO (CH1-CH4, CH88, CH99)
Chichester DO (PO18-PO20)
Chipping Norton DO (OX7)
Coalville DO (LE6, LE7)
Crewe DO (CW1, CW2, CW3)
Cullompton DO (EX15)
Downham Market DO (PE32, PE33, PE38)
Dudley DO (DY1-DY3)
East Dulwich DO (SE22)
Ebbw Vale DO (NP23)
Egremont DO (CA21, CA22, CA23, CA24, CA25, CA27)
Ely DO (CB6-CB7)
Exmouth DO (EX8-EX9)
Frome DO (BA11)
Glenrothes DO (KY6, KY7)
Houghton Le Spring DO (DH4, DH5)
Hoylake DO (CH47-CH48)
Ilfracombe DO (EX34)
Jarrow DO (NE31, NE32, NE35, NE36)
Kidderminster DO (DY10-DY12, DY14)
Kirkcaldy DO (KY1-KY3)
Lark Lane DO (L17)
Leicester East DO (LE2, LE5, LE7)
Lichfield DO (WS7, WS13, WS14)
Lochgelly DO (KY5)
Loughborough DO (LE11-LE12)
March DO (PE15)
Mid Rhondda Ganol DO (CF39-CF40)
New Ferry DO (CH32, CH62, CH63)
Northfield DO (BS31)
Northwich DO (CW8, CW9)
Nuneaton DO (CV10, CV11, CV13)
Orton Southgate DO (PE2, PE7-PE9)
Oxford DO (OX1-OX2)
Oxford East DO (OX3, OX4, OX33, OX44, OX49)
Porthcawl DO (CF36)
Portsmouth DO (PO1, PO2, PO3, PO4, PO5, PO6)
Ramsgate DO (CT11, CT12)
Reading East DO (RG4, RG5, RG6, RG10)
Reading West DO (RG30-RG31)
Runcorn DO (WA7)
Rugeley DO (WS15)
Shrewsbury DO (SY1-SY5)
Speke DO (L24)
St Helens DO (WA9, WA10, WA11)
Tarporley DO (CW6)
Taunton DO (TA1, TA2, TA3, TA4)
Teignmouth DO (TQ14)
Thornbury DO (BS35)
Wallingford DO (OX10, OX49)
Warrington DO (WA1, WA2, WA4, WA5, WA55)
Waterlooville DO (PO7-PO8)
Wednesbury DO (WS10)
Westbury DO (BA13)
Weston Super Mare (BS22, BS23, BS24, BS40)
West Norwood DO (SE27)
Wilmslow DO (SK9)
Wincanton DO (BA7, BA8, BA9, BA10)
Winsford DO (CW7, CW10)
Witham DO (CM8)
Witney DO (OX18, OX28, OX29)
Woolton DO (L25, L26, L27)

Units that report three consecutive days of 30% of DPs failing USO gets you on the list and public RM service disruption website. Then you need three consecutive days below 30% to get off the list (well below and back to stable USO)

221B Baker Street: The number 221 is permanently etched into pop-culture history as the home address of the legendary detective Sherlock Holmes.

Image
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
Barnacle
Posts: 2909
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by Barnacle »

Seriously. This is a joke.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
qwerty2
Posts: 2082
Joined: 30 Jun 2009, 00:42
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by qwerty2 »

Made the list :nana :nana :nana :nana
On DM26 :nana :nana :nana


Shambles :arrrghhh
antcpfc
Posts: 629
Joined: 18 Sep 2007, 17:25

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by antcpfc »

:chuckle
Does anyone actually get pulled in for this? I mean area managers and above.
Slider tool. Lol.
Barnacle
Posts: 2909
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by Barnacle »

Is this evidence that they have run out of staff to move around to fix things?
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
Clappedoutpostie
Posts: 1260
Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
Gender: Male

Re: Offices 'officially' in trouble?

Post by Clappedoutpostie »

Barnacle wrote:
Yesterday, 16:17
Is this evidence that they have run out of staff to move around to fix things?
They are running out of staff full stop. We had 3 new starters last week, by the end of the week 2 had already left and the 3rd had gone off sick.