ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

No 16.30 cap?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
TopperGas
Posts: 3333
Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
Gender: Male

Re: No 16.30 cap?

Post by TopperGas »

heapsy wrote:
15 Jul 2026, 05:45
clashcityrocker wrote:
14 Jul 2026, 11:20
TopperGas wrote:
14 Jul 2026, 09:15


Unless you've all newish starters sorting why does anybody need to use an idiot board,
So when they introduce the DPRs how does anybody know the sorting?
How long do you think it takes to learn that level of sorting?
Why ask the person next to you when you have a machine in your hand that gives you the answer?

In comparison the letter sorting for the 3 postcode areas contains about 20 walks each.
The sorting is still fairly slow and inaccurate when a new person has to do it.

If I sort the letters I have a fairly good idea where everything goes because I have done every one of those walks at some point.
By contrast I have never done any of the DPR duties and two thirds are in postcodes where I have very limited experience.
Therefore it is much quicker to use a system where the machine tells you where to place the parcel.
DPR isn't perfect either. In fact, it is illogical to some extent.
DPR's are done by duties in our DO, it doesn't take long to work out duties 1,2,3,4 go in one York, duties,.5,6,7,8 in another. I don't need a PDA to tell me that.

How long does read two addresses throw into a York take, compared to scan bar code read York code throw into York? The fact it's not been rolled out nationwide suggests it's not efficient in DO's where there's not a massive turnover in staff.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16464
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: No 16.30 cap?

Post by clashcityrocker »

TopperGas wrote:
15 Jul 2026, 07:58

How long does read two addresses throw into a York take, compared to scan bar code read York code throw into York? The fact it's not been rolled out nationwide suggests it's not efficient in DO's where there's not a massive turnover in staff.
You do appear to have an awful lot to say about something you have no experience of.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Mr Rush
Posts: 3135
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: No 16.30 cap?

Post by Mr Rush »

Yay, totally spoiled for choice with our projected finish times: do we want 1632 or 1657 on a Wednesday? :arrrghhh

We could have ditched Saturdays years ago when Tracked was still light enough it could reasonably be covered by reduced staffing and retain an early afternoon finish.

Just end this farce now and send Kretinsky to debtor's prison :evil/mad
The machine stops.
Perseus
Posts: 1000
Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
Gender: Male

Re: No 16.30 cap?

Post by Perseus »

Yeah, not too far off other times I've seen. I'll be honest, I thought maybe around 5 years ago that the job in ten years time would be a 9-5. They've managed to beat it. Quite considerably.
Mr Rush
Posts: 3135
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: No 16.30 cap?

Post by Mr Rush »

Perseus wrote:
17 Jul 2026, 19:29
I'll be honest, I thought maybe around 5 years ago that the job in ten years time would be a 9-5. They've managed to beat it. Quite considerably.
I've managed to find Martin Walsh's post about preventing the job from becoming 9 to 5. He'll be right on a technicality - start time will be 0817.
Mr Rush wrote:
23 May 2026, 16:02
Martin Walsh wrote:
23 May 2026, 10:35
Royal Mail would love a 9-5 model for parcels but the union has stopped this now on four occasions dating back to 2017.
[...] At least up here in the Central Belt, where, I might add, 9-5 is one more push away.
Uh oh, a butterfly in Budapest flapped its wings.
The machine stops.
Perseus
Posts: 1000
Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
Gender: Male

Re: No 16.30 cap?

Post by Perseus »

Incredible