ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Pension Surplus

Royal Mail pension news and discussion.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
RobertT
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 6548
Joined: 09 Sep 2007, 14:26
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by RobertT »

norris9 wrote:
01 Jan 2025, 21:27
Does anyone have any thoughts on the following...

Is the pension surplus more likely going to be used to benefit all current employees or more likely going to benefit anyone that is alive today that has paid into any Royal Mail pension?

I am asking this as I am curious as to whether I should make sure I am employed at the time they make a decision on this, as I am considering leaving RM in the next year or 2....

I am at least interested in seeing how Kretinsky changes things and whether the changes are for the better or not as I do like working as a postie for the most part.
EP group and the CWU recently came to an agreement to what they want to do with the RMPP surplus. Basically they want to split it between investment in RMG and for the benefit of employees.
Brief details can be found here: https://www.internationaldistributionse ... eement.pdf

The RMPP trustees do have a say over how much of the surplus can be released and they could still say they want want RMPP members specifically to gain from it.
Considering a majority of current employees don't have RMPP benefits, personally I think that would be a fair thing to do!

There isn't a set timetable and it could be a few years before any surplus cash is released and it may also depend on what the trustees plans are for the scheme. For example: Continue to run it as now or go the buy in/buy out route.

The CWU did initially say they wanted the surplus to reduce the NRA of the new collective pension, but they seem to have gone quiet on that.
Presumably because someone told them it would need a bottomless pit of money for it to be a feasible proposition! :cuppa
Links to all RM pension related websites are here
norris9
Posts: 2559
Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 17:32
Gender: Female

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by norris9 »

Even if the age is reduced by 1 year to 66 I'd be happy with that, better than nothing.
mphill007
Posts: 9
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 11:45
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by mphill007 »

Surely the RMPP trustees should look after the interests of the RMPP members not what the CWU are proposing where employees are prioritised some a lot of which are not even RMPP members!
renrag40
Posts: 423
Joined: 05 Jun 2019, 00:35
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by renrag40 »

norris9 wrote:
02 Jan 2025, 18:53
Even if the age is reduced by 1 year to 66 I'd be happy with that, better than nothing.
But it would mean that present RMPP pensioners would receive no benefit from the surplus.... why should they subsidise a completely different pension scheme?
The union leadership should hang their heads in shame that they have put their names to this proposal.
But we have found with recent agreements that they are more interested in making sure that the union survives above all else.
I see senior union officials as a de facto level of Royal Mail management.
Hyrrokkin
Posts: 793
Joined: 24 Nov 2021, 18:17
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by Hyrrokkin »

mphill007 wrote:
02 Jan 2025, 19:24
Surely the RMPP trustees should look after the interests of the RMPP members not what the CWU are proposing where employees are prioritised some a lot of which are not even RMPP members!
:Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause

Who are the CWU to decide what happens with pension surplus anyway

We paid into it - RM paid into it for the sole purpose of OUR pension

RM should not get a single penny - it is for us and us alone

It is theft and i would like the CWU rep (forgot his name) on here to try and justify it

What the CWU are supporting is a disgrace

OUR money will be used to help RM - how exactly would that money be spent and on what and who spends it.
No wonder the new owner wants his greedy hands on RM he is getting free money - our money.
milly
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1233
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 09:43

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by milly »

Hyrrokkin wrote:
03 Jan 2025, 18:33
mphill007 wrote:
02 Jan 2025, 19:24
Surely the RMPP trustees should look after the interests of the RMPP members not what the CWU are proposing where employees are prioritised some a lot of which are not even RMPP members!
:Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause

Who are the CWU to decide what happens with pension surplus anyway

We paid into it - RM paid into it for the sole purpose of OUR pension

RM should not get a single penny - it is for us and us alone

It is theft and i would like the CWU rep (forgot his name) on here to try and justify it

What the CWU are supporting is a disgrace

OUR money will be used to help RM - how exactly would that money be spent and on what and who spends it.
No wonder the new owner wants his greedy hands on RM he is getting free money - our money.
Your views seems a little right wing, surely this money ought to be used for the greater good, and help our colleagues who are less fortunate.
Hyrrokkin
Posts: 793
Joined: 24 Nov 2021, 18:17
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by Hyrrokkin »

milly wrote:
03 Jan 2025, 19:29
Hyrrokkin wrote:
03 Jan 2025, 18:33
mphill007 wrote:
02 Jan 2025, 19:24
Surely the RMPP trustees should look after the interests of the RMPP members not what the CWU are proposing where employees are prioritised some a lot of which are not even RMPP members!
:Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause

Who are the CWU to decide what happens with pension surplus anyway

We paid into it - RM paid into it for the sole purpose of OUR pension

RM should not get a single penny - it is for us and us alone

It is theft and i would like the CWU rep (forgot his name) on here to try and justify it

What the CWU are supporting is a disgrace

OUR money will be used to help RM - how exactly would that money be spent and on what and who spends it.
No wonder the new owner wants his greedy hands on RM he is getting free money - our money.
Your views seems a little right wing, surely this money ought to be used for the greater good, and help our colleagues who are less fortunate.
What ????
Oh i forgot it is you Milly our resident economics expert
milly
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1233
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 09:43

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by milly »

Hyrrokkin wrote:
03 Jan 2025, 20:35
milly wrote:
03 Jan 2025, 19:29
Hyrrokkin wrote:
03 Jan 2025, 18:33
mphill007 wrote:
02 Jan 2025, 19:24
Surely the RMPP trustees should look after the interests of the RMPP members not what the CWU are proposing where employees are prioritised some a lot of which are not even RMPP members!
:Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause

Who are the CWU to decide what happens with pension surplus anyway

We paid into it - RM paid into it for the sole purpose of OUR pension

RM should not get a single penny - it is for us and us alone

It is theft and i would like the CWU rep (forgot his name) on here to try and justify it

What the CWU are supporting is a disgrace

OUR money will be used to help RM - how exactly would that money be spent and on what and who spends it.
No wonder the new owner wants his greedy hands on RM he is getting free money - our money.
Your views seems a little right wing, surely this money ought to be used for the greater good, and help our colleagues who are less fortunate.
What ????
Oh i forgot it is you Milly our resident economics expert and tin hat doomsayer
1, You don't believe the money ought to be used for the greater good to help our fellow colleagues?
2, Or do you believe the money should only be dispersed amongst the people who've paid into the pension?

You seem drawn to the right wing answer rather than the left wing answer, most probably because you become right wing when you perceive that your cash is going to be given to someone who may not have contributed to the pension :dance

As for being an economics expert, anyone with half a brain can see the economy is going down the gurgler thanks to a real economics expert called Rachel Reeves,lol!
A2B
Posts: 1771
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 19:34
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by A2B »

It's very simple in my eyes, it should go to the people who paid into the fund. There is no left or right wing answer

Should I/we take money from our bank accounts if we are lucky enough to have saved some money during our time working for RM and give it to new staff? youre basically suggesting the same thing
milly
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1233
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 09:43

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by milly »

A2B wrote:
03 Jan 2025, 22:02
It's very simple in my eyes, it should go to the people who paid into the fund. There is no left or right wing answer

Should I/we take money from our bank accounts if we are lucky enough to have saved some money during our time working for RM and give it to new staff? youre basically suggesting the same thing
Someone on the left would have no problem with other people's money being redistributed amongst all of the workers ,whereas some on the right would insist that it is distributed amongst the people who paid in.
I'm merely shining a light on the hypocritical views of some of the lefties on here.
They're all for the redistribution of wealth so long as its not their money.
Personally, I think the money ought to be left where it is.
A2B
Posts: 1771
Joined: 25 Feb 2009, 19:34
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by A2B »

Thanks for your Facebook Uni political insight, very enlightening :arrrghhh
milly
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 1233
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 09:43

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by milly »

A2B wrote:
03 Jan 2025, 22:44
Thanks for your Facebook Uni political insight, very enlightening :arrrghhh
You're welcome :thumbup
Hyrrokkin
Posts: 793
Joined: 24 Nov 2021, 18:17
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by Hyrrokkin »

A2B wrote:
03 Jan 2025, 22:02
It's very simple in my eyes, it should go to the people who paid into the fund. There is no left or right wing answer

Should I/we take money from our bank accounts if we are lucky enough to have saved some money during our time working for RM and give it to new staff? youre basically suggesting the same thing
:Applause :Applause :Applause
mphill007
Posts: 9
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 11:45
Gender: Male

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by mphill007 »

The least the RMPP trustees should be agreeing to is that all members of the RMPP,employed and ex employed should be part of any extra surplus benefit.Certainly if as the CWU want that non RMPP members are!
claretandblue
Posts: 840
Joined: 01 Aug 2007, 12:14

Re: Pension Surplus

Post by claretandblue »

milly wrote:
03 Jan 2025, 22:24
A2B wrote:
03 Jan 2025, 22:02
It's very simple in my eyes, it should go to the people who paid into the fund. There is no left or right wing answer

Should I/we take money from our bank accounts if we are lucky enough to have saved some money during our time working for RM and give it to new staff? youre basically suggesting the same thing
Someone on the left would have no problem with other people's money being redistributed amongst all of the workers ,whereas some on the right would insist that it is distributed amongst the people who paid in.
I'm merely shining a light on the hypocritical views of some of the lefties on here.
They're all for the redistribution of wealth so long as its not their money.
Personally, I think the money ought to be left where it is.
We know that people on the left have no problems spending other people's money.