ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
35 hrs
-
yellowbelly
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: 23 Jun 2015, 15:51
- Gender: Male
Re: 35 hrs
So full time but not full time - I get it now!
-
ted_e_bear
- Posts: 3967
- Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
- Gender: Male
Re: 35 hrs
All full time contracts are equal but some are more equal than othersclashcityrocker wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 16:58It is full time.
It is just less hours than a 37 hour contract, so obviously you get a smaller Xmas bonus.
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16469
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: 35 hrs
If 35 hours isn't full time because it is less than 37, then 37 isn't full time because it is less than 40.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
yellowbelly
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: 23 Jun 2015, 15:51
- Gender: Male
Re: 35 hrs
You like potato and I like potato
You like tomato and I like tomato
Potato, potato, tomato, tomato
Let's call the whole thing off
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2772
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: 35 hrs
It is UK Law that full time is 35hrs and above.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12073
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2772
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: 35 hrs
All full time duties are 35hrs and above. Referring to 35 hours as part time has no legal basis.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 20:30Irrelevant. ALL full time duties are 37hrs, anything below is considered to be part time
There’s just a mental block at RM because 37 was the standard marker. But that is not the case in Employment Law.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
N|M
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 192
- Joined: 19 Nov 2021, 21:26
- Gender: Male
Re: 35 hrs
cant tell you the whole net pay as i work nights so get night premiums however the basic 35hrs is £477.83 also all your allowances will be less than those on 37hrs.pieoftheday wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 15:05Afternoon, if I reduce my hours from 37 hrs to 35hrs, old contract, on delivery, what's the net take home pay? Ta
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12073
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: 35 hrs
It doesn't matter what the employment law says, full time duties are 37hrs, they've been that for a few years now and unless we get a further reduction in the length of the working week, they'll always be 37hrsBarnacle wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 20:51All full time duties are 35hrs and above. Referring to 35 hours as part time has no legal basis.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 20:30Irrelevant. ALL full time duties are 37hrs, anything below is considered to be part time
There’s just a mental block at RM because 37 was the standard marker. But that is not the case in Employment Law.
-
clashcityrocker
- Posts: 16469
- Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
- Gender: Male
- Location: strummerville
Re: 35 hrs
Why can't 40 hour contracts, 37 hour contracts and 35 hour contracts all be full time?
My partner's full time (not in RM obv) contract is 34 hours. Should I tell her she is part time?
When the flight path to a 35 hour week was still an objective those being made full time were given 35 hour contracts.
It was the new full time contract.
Things have moved on and objectives have shifted but still.
My partner's full time (not in RM obv) contract is 34 hours. Should I tell her she is part time?
When the flight path to a 35 hour week was still an objective those being made full time were given 35 hour contracts.
It was the new full time contract.
Things have moved on and objectives have shifted but still.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
-
ted_e_bear
- Posts: 3967
- Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
- Gender: Male
Re: 35 hrs
I know what you mean, I think it just grates that they introduced that 35hr cap prematurely alongside the existing 37, imho they should have matched whatever was currently classed as "full" time, anyway they didn't so as you say we can't do anything about it.clashcityrocker wrote: ↑17 Sep 2024, 06:32Why can't 40 hour contracts, 37 hour contracts and 35 hour contracts all be full time?
My partner's full time (not in RM obv) contract is 34 hours. Should I tell her she is part time?
When the flight path to a 35 hour week was still an objective those being made full time were given 35 hour contracts.
It was the new full time contract.
Things have moved on and objectives have shifted but still.
It certainly grated with me at the time, got made up to 35 and told to book a differing amount daily due to longs and shorts which obviously seemed ridiculous, anyway after finding out on here that they can apply a "temporary" uplift to 37 I phoned HR who confirmed that it was true and had to push and push to get the manager to accept to do it.
-
qwerty2
- Posts: 2011
- Joined: 30 Jun 2009, 00:42
- Gender: Male
Re: 35 hrs
There’s a couple of 35hrs duties in my office and they’re classed as full timeSpacePhoenix wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 21:35It doesn't matter what the employment law says, full time duties are 37hrs, they've been that for a few years now and unless we get a further reduction in the length of the working week, they'll always be 37hrsBarnacle wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 20:51All full time duties are 35hrs and above. Referring to 35 hours as part time has no legal basis.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑16 Sep 2024, 20:30Irrelevant. ALL full time duties are 37hrs, anything below is considered to be part time
There’s just a mental block at RM because 37 was the standard marker. But that is not the case in Employment Law.
-
enskied
- Posts: 1877
- Joined: 16 Aug 2013, 17:14
- Gender: Male
Re: 35 hrs
35 hrs is the full time contract now, that's the default position ever since the union proposed it.
I am not on a 35 hrs contract yet management say that I am so close to it they will treat me as I am.
I am not on a 35 hrs contract yet management say that I am so close to it they will treat me as I am.
-
yellowbelly
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: 23 Jun 2015, 15:51
- Gender: Male
Re: 35 hrs
Genuine question - what benefit do you get from management treating you as FT @ 35 hrs (or near to it)?
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2772
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: 35 hrs
There’s the same benefit from management as being on 37hrs. Treated the same. Equal contempt.yellowbelly wrote: ↑17 Sep 2024, 20:52Genuine question - what benefit do you get from management treating you as FT @ 35 hrs (or near to it)?
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’