ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Vote No.

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
Tman
Posts: 4135
Joined: 21 Oct 2007, 09:57

Re: Vote No.

Post by Tman »

smartin1982 wrote:
18 Jun 2023, 18:23
I’ve also said to you before, you patronising little tit rifle,
Question of the day is not whether to vote yes or no, but WTF is a tit rifle?
nuisance
Posts: 215
Joined: 06 Oct 2016, 12:57
Gender: Female

Re: Vote No.

Post by nuisance »

aiden01 wrote:
19 Jun 2023, 10:24
Do you honestly think people will go out for a week or weeks at a time.
They would up here.
LancePercival
Posts: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2023, 18:08
Gender: Male

Re: Vote No.

Post by LancePercival »

aiden01 wrote:
19 Jun 2023, 10:24
nuisance wrote:
19 Jun 2023, 06:16
1 New negotiators. The last ones have just given away lots and gained naf all. Except for whatever they must have won for themselves.

2. Strikes that actually really do cost them. Not just delay by a day or two which RM are happy to do to their customers anyway. All out on the weeks that matter. We should have been out at least a fortnight last december, that's our maximum leverage and the union squandered it. Every bank holiday parcel ordering rockets - out for the next few days after them. RM whined that the strikes cost them money, well show them we can really cost them money, that's really all they're bothered about.

3. Organised non-compliance. We're all still toeing the line, except for Glasglow. If the union leads us in enormous awkwardness, amplified withdrawral of goodwill is what can break the stalemate.
Do you honestly think people will go out for a week or weeks at a time.
I would