ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Joint working parties

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
jtshocka
Posts: 24
Joined: 19 Mar 2010, 22:15
Gender: Male

Joint working parties

Post by jtshocka »

What planet is cwu leadership on joint working parties is a one way street for royal mail top brass they will do what they want when they want cwu can't protect there own reps let alone us posties. After hearing dave ward on face book best thing vote no and come out of this union it wont and cant protect us save your money after this pathetic deal no person in there right mind will ever strike again.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16624
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Joint working parties

Post by clashcityrocker »

If you vote no surely you will need the union to protect you in the brave new world.
Voting no and leaving the union seems to be the height of madness.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
77SAMPOST77
PARCELFORCE
Posts: 372
Joined: 20 Sep 2022, 15:49
Gender: Male

Re: Joint working parties

Post by 77SAMPOST77 »

clashcityrocker wrote:
05 May 2023, 18:13
If you vote no surely you will need the union to protect you in the brave new world.
Voting no and leaving the union seems to be the height of madness.
The union are not protecting us anyway , they are colluding with RM in this pathetic deal ,

Voting yes is the height of madness .
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Joint working parties

Post by DirtyHarry »

clashcityrocker wrote:
05 May 2023, 18:13
If you vote no surely you will need the union to protect you in the brave new world.
Voting no and leaving the union seems to be the height of madness.
If only they could have 'protected' us, and our terms and conditions.

If this deal gets ratified, you will have a weaker union, with fewer members, even easier to ignore next time around.

Good luck when seeking their 'protection' under that climate.

Even if I had years left in this awful job, working for this God damned company, I wouldn't want to give Ward another damn penny, he's not worth the money he's getting.
scotchy1962
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 866
Joined: 25 Mar 2020, 16:55
Gender: Male

Re: Joint working parties

Post by scotchy1962 »

clashcityrocker wrote:
05 May 2023, 18:13
If you vote no surely you will need the union to protect you in the brave new world.
Voting no and leaving the union seems to be the height of madness.
I am with you clash on this one, voting No and leaving is going down a dangerous route.
If you arent happy with the current leadership, vote them out at the next election.
Now if the yes vote goes through it might not matter if you are in a union or not as they will have lost all power in the workplace. Thats the thing i dont understand, we can all see it but they are prepared to sell out to keep a place at RMs table of crumbs, and lets face it thats all they are offering.
Flashman_
Posts: 363
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 00:08
Gender: Male

Re: Joint working parties

Post by Flashman_ »

The only protection you really need once our Union takes on the company rhetoric, is legal protections that you may need to fight for you in a possible tribunal, or other legal requirements. So leaving the CWU does not mean giving up those benefits. I believe The GMB union for example will take on anyone, as far as industry sector is concerned.
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16624
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Joint working parties

Post by clashcityrocker »

DirtyHarry wrote:
05 May 2023, 18:43

If only they could have 'protected' us, and our terms and conditions.
Of course they couldn't protect our terms and conditions.
We are a privately owned company with civil service terms and conditions.
The direction of travel was clear when they removed our final salary pension. Years ago.
If you didn't understand that then I don't know what you were thinking.

Simple question. Did you accept your "free" shares?
Didn't you understand the cost that came with them?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Wullie10
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 712
Joined: 30 Jul 2017, 12:07
Gender: Male
Location: Retired

Re: Joint working parties

Post by Wullie10 »

clashcityrocker wrote:
05 May 2023, 19:14
DirtyHarry wrote:
05 May 2023, 18:43

If only they could have 'protected' us, and our terms and conditions.
Of course they couldn't protect our terms and conditions.
We are a privately owned company with civil service terms and conditions.
The direction of travel was clear when they removed our final salary pension. Years ago.
If you didn't understand that then I don't know what you were thinking.

Simple question. Did you accept your "free" shares?
Didn't you understand the cost that came with them?
Exactly, the horse bolted years ago. What can they achieve now ? It's too late the game is up. Going on strike in August when Christmas strikes didn't work , what's the point ? Basically if you don't like the job best to leave. But most posties know it'll be very difficult to find better pay for skill level , basically a parcel job and pizza leaflet drops. Most will continue for the next 10/ 20 years and moan like hell how crap the job is.
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Joint working parties

Post by DirtyHarry »

clashcityrocker wrote:
05 May 2023, 19:14
DirtyHarry wrote:
05 May 2023, 18:43

If only they could have 'protected' us, and our terms and conditions.
Of course they couldn't protect our terms and conditions.
We are a privately owned company with civil service terms and conditions.
The direction of travel was clear when they removed our final salary pension. Years ago.
If you didn't understand that then I don't know what you were thinking.

Simple question. Did you accept your "free" shares?
Didn't you understand the cost that came with them?
I did accept the free shares, yes. It was a done deal, one I didn't vote for, but the majority did, and yes, I knew the membership had shot themselves in both feet, on that occassion.

But, I didn't take it to mean, that's it, the bastards can do whatever they like now, I'll just roll over and let them tickle my belly from now on.

Simple question. Did you?
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16624
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Joint working parties

Post by clashcityrocker »

DirtyHarry wrote:
05 May 2023, 20:47


Simple question. Did you?
No. I have never taken 1 share or 1 penny in dividends.
That is where our pay rise has gone. That is where our pension has gone.
300 of us out of 120 000.
That is when we were sold out. And you were all complicit in it because you only saw the pound signs. Kerching!

God does it make me laugh when I read about people on here going on about the greedy shareholders.
What they actually mean is they don't like greedier shareholders.
And it has been a rearguard action ever since.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Zicomurphy
Posts: 576
Joined: 24 Oct 2014, 06:40
Gender: Male

Re: Joint working parties

Post by Zicomurphy »

clashcityrocker wrote:
06 May 2023, 05:55
DirtyHarry wrote:
05 May 2023, 20:47


Simple question. Did you?
No. I have never taken 1 share or 1 penny in dividends.
That is where our pay rise has gone. That is where our pension has gone.
300 of us out of 120 000.
That is when we were sold out. And you were all complicit in it because you only saw the pound signs. Kerching!

God does it make me laugh when I read about people on here going on about the greedy shareholders.
What they actually mean is they don't like greedier shareholders.
And it has been a rearguard action ever since.

If every single Royal Mail employee had rejected the free shares it would not have made one iota of difference. Royal Mail would still have been privatised and we would still find ourselves in the position we are now. It was a political decision made by the government of the day. We had absolutely no say in it.
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Joint working parties

Post by DirtyHarry »

clashcityrocker wrote:
06 May 2023, 05:55
DirtyHarry wrote:
05 May 2023, 20:47


Simple question. Did you?
No. I have never taken 1 share or 1 penny in dividends.
That is where our pay rise has gone. That is where our pension has gone.
300 of us out of 120 000.
That is when we were sold out. And you were all complicit in it because you only saw the pound signs. Kerching!

God does it make me laugh when I read about people on here going on about the greedy shareholders.
What they actually mean is they don't like greedier shareholders.
And it has been a rearguard action ever since.
I think I get you now.
You love praise, to be praised, to be one, and at the same time, not really one, at all.
Ok, I'm game.
From now on, I will shower you with the praise you craze.
You're fantastic, you are.
I wish we could all be like you, (sniggers) Clash! :left:
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16624
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Joint working parties

Post by clashcityrocker »

Zicomurphy wrote:
06 May 2023, 07:19


If every single Royal Mail employee had rejected the free shares it would not have made one iota of difference. Royal Mail would still have been privatised and we would still find ourselves in the position we are now. It was a political decision made by the government of the day. We had absolutely no say in it.
Correct = it would have made no difference but what a message for 120 000 workers to send.
We do not believe privatisation will be good for us and we do not believe it will be good for the public service we provide.
We will not take part in the charade that is the "free" share allocation.

Those were my principles.
What were the principles of those that accepted the shares?
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Hyrrokkin
Posts: 870
Joined: 24 Nov 2021, 18:17
Gender: Male

Re: Joint working parties

Post by Hyrrokkin »

clashcityrocker wrote:
06 May 2023, 05:55
DirtyHarry wrote:
05 May 2023, 20:47


Simple question. Did you?
No. I have never taken 1 share or 1 penny in dividends.
That is where our pay rise has gone. That is where our pension has gone.
300 of us out of 120 000.
That is when we were sold out. And you were all complicit in it because you only saw the pound signs. Kerching!

God does it make me laugh when I read about people on here going on about the greedy shareholders.
What they actually mean is they don't like greedier shareholders.
And it has been a rearguard action ever since.
Now now Clash was on one of his "look at me i am morally superior to you,i know better and see the big picture" ravings
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12140
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: Joint working parties

Post by SpacePhoenix »

Joint working parties? Bollocks, will more likely be just RM dictating to the CWU what they're going to do