ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
redlen
Posts: 1341
Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by redlen »

The reference link that I have posted from ,GOV states different.
Even then, laziness and misconduct are exempt from that procedure as stated in that document contrary to what you previously stated


Have now asked repeatedly where that document has been agreed and what national agreement, and even if it exists anymore.

Kindly post a third party link to that agreement
77SAMPOST77
PARCELFORCE
Posts: 372
Joined: 20 Sep 2022, 15:49
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by 77SAMPOST77 »

Acca Dacca wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 19:28
woofwoof wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 19:26
Woody Guthrie wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 19:07
redlen wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 18:32
Is it a Royal Mail policy the NCI procedure??
Yes.
I thought someone with your vast legal knowledge would know that.
Please link the national agreement section where this process agreed with collective bargaining and delivery/processing staff?
I'm not your secretary Len..
But I'll give you a taster because I'm a decent bloke ..

_20230314_190152.JPG

Now could we get back on topic...
Is that not a parcel force document
read the first line
Redlen and woody having a disagreement
the 2 most boring people on here .
Both need to get a life .
redlen
Posts: 1341
Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by redlen »

Debates are about learning, not point scoring or trying to humiliate your opponent in that debate.

Will now retire from this debate

Res Ipsa Loquitur
Last edited by redlen on 14 Mar 2023, 19:50, edited 1 time in total.
richietns
Posts: 1085
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by richietns »

77SAMPOST77 wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 19:39
Acca Dacca wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 19:28
woofwoof wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 19:26
Woody Guthrie wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 19:07
redlen wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 18:32
Is it a Royal Mail policy the NCI procedure??
Yes.
I thought someone with your vast legal knowledge would know that.
Please link the national agreement section where this process agreed with collective bargaining and delivery/processing staff?
I'm not your secretary Len..
But I'll give you a taster because I'm a decent bloke ..

_20230314_190152.JPG

Now could we get back on topic...
Is that not a parcel force document
read the first line
Redlen and woody having a disagreement
the 2 most boring people on here .
Both need to get a life .
Thats a harsh isn't it,it is discussion forum about work.
guardianangel
Posts: 1828
Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by guardianangel »

Woody Guthrie wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 16:13
redlen wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 12:49
They can dismiss you on capability and use traffic volumes as justification.
I'd need to see the working on that one.
Under the present procedure and the legal framework surrounding disability discrimination the NCI process is completely impotent.

In all the years I've been in this business and all the cases I've been involved with I've never seen or even heard rumour of anyone being dismissed purely on capability grounds.

I'm not even sure what you mean by using traffic volumes as justification, that makes even less sense.
my mate has been cutting off regularly for 20 years and he's still here :crazy: :chuckle :chuckle :chuckle
sindba
Posts: 1451
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by sindba »

redlen wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 19:46
Debates are about learning, not point scoring or trying to humiliate your opponent in that debate.

Will now retire from this debate

Res Ipsa Loquitur
Supercillious much
worktotime
Posts: 2861
Joined: 14 May 2010, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by worktotime »

pieoftheday wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 15:44
redlen wrote:
14 Mar 2023, 15:17
They get the traffic figures from the mail centre on the amount of trailers arriving for processing each day. Then you have the machines, including the PSM, that count the items. It is then easy to put processing hours on each day required with the expected traffic that arrives in the delivery office. Individual duties are irrelevant, as that is inward sorting time allowed. The outdoor delivery span remains the same with call points.
How come they're getting the revised deliveries so wrong?
its the usual , you put s**t in you get s**t out , un workable figures ie d2ds , call rates , parcel knocks , knock on neighbours , scanning , taking photos , new builds ,collections , non of this data was put into revisions , all it is they are told we want x amount of hours out the orrifice so the managers have to make it work , so theres the problem and its there problem not ours , :thumbup
manfromuncle
Posts: 48
Joined: 23 Oct 2012, 16:31
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by manfromuncle »

At our office we have been checking the counts coming from the mail centre and their figures are way lower than the actual items. Packets in yorks are nearly double what they have quoted.
Been happening for years and you wonder why we are classed as inefficient.
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 12134
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by SpacePhoenix »

manfromuncle wrote:
15 Mar 2023, 11:59
At our office we have been checking the counts coming from the mail centre and their figures are way lower than the actual items. Packets in yorks are nearly double what they have quoted.
Been happening for years and you wonder why we are classed as inefficient.
Each mail stream has an "average container fill (ACF)" for whatever type of container is associated with it. The outgoing traffic is the ACF x the number on containers. We stopped doing part fills ages ago. Think you'll find that many of the packets, at least the small ones are technically large letters.

AFAIK the ACF levels are set nationally, I believe that "Traffic Staff" count the contents of random containers and feed them counts to some central office somewhere
Schiff
Posts: 544
Joined: 01 Nov 2016, 22:02
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by Schiff »

OK. So the talks were extended from the original deadline and "into this week". Well we are now at the end of the week. Surely we either have an agreement to put to members or else announce strike dates if RM remain unwilling to agree to our demands.
Burghboy
Posts: 224
Joined: 21 Oct 2013, 09:19
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by Burghboy »

hearing there will be an update at the end of play today...
sindba
Posts: 1451
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by sindba »

Hope so. I wasn't too fussed about last week's silence,but we could do with a proper update now
Pidleypoo
Posts: 702
Joined: 17 Dec 2014, 10:05
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by Pidleypoo »

The update will be that they’re having an extension to the extended talks and are going to have an extension built at acas for the extended talks in the extension.
49erman
Posts: 254
Joined: 18 Sep 2017, 13:18
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by 49erman »

Burghboy wrote:
17 Mar 2023, 13:27
hearing there will be an update at the end of play today...
If no resolution then we can’t keep extending talks, it must be more strike action, they’re just playing games with the CWU :no no
49erman
Posts: 254
Joined: 18 Sep 2017, 13:18
Gender: Male

Re: Update on Talks - Monday 13th March

Post by 49erman »

Burghboy wrote:
17 Mar 2023, 13:27
hearing there will be an update at the end of play today...
If no resolution then we can’t keep extending talks, it must be more strike action, they’re just playing games with the CWU :no no