https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article ... statements
UNDER-PRESSURE Royal Mail bosses are employing “unusual uses of the English language to give inaccurate statements,” MPs said today in a feisty committee hearing.
The privatised firm’s top brass were hauled back in front of the cross-party business, energy and industrial strategy committee after accusations that they had given “misleading” evidence during a hearing last month.
Company chief executive Simon Thompson, operations development director Ricky McAulay and Royal Mail Group chairman Keith Williams are deliberately ignoring the strike-hit company’s statutory universal service obligation (USO) to deliver letters six days a week, focusing on parcels instead, MPs said.
Worker testimony also shows that bosses are using intrusive technology to “manage the performance” of intimidated workers, they added.
Committee chairman and Labour MP Darren Jones repeatedly asked Mr Thompson to provide a “yes or no” answer to his assertion that there is a “systemic failure” to meet the USO.
The chief executive failed to give a direct answer, suggesting the firm is now “doing better.”
He put his previous denials that letters are not being prioritised down to “context,” saying “policy had differed from operational reality.”
Mr Jones queried the response and others like it as “unusual uses of the English language.”
MPs dismissed suggestions that ongoing strike action — launched by the CWU union last August amid fears that bosses plan to impose gig-economy-style conditions alongside thousands of job cuts — is to blame, saying some workers argue the USO has been neglected “for years.”
Former shadow cabinet minister Andy McDonald and SNP MP Alan Brown ridiculed claims that “postal digital assistants,” featuring a yellow dot which gets bigger the longer a postie stays in one place, are not being used to monitor staff.
Mr McAulay claimed the tech is only used to “generate follow-up conversations” if needed.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Royal Mail bosses employing 'unusual uses of the English language to give inaccurate statements'
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72654
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Royal Mail bosses employing 'unusual uses of the English language to give inaccurate statements'
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London
Re: Royal Mail bosses employing 'unusual uses of the English language to give inaccurate statements'
'The chief executive failed to give a direct answer.'
The unusual use of the English language by these shysters?
Just their pathetic attempt to disguise their lies.
And as usual with those clowns, it ends in failure.
The unusual use of the English language by these shysters?
Just their pathetic attempt to disguise their lies.
And as usual with those clowns, it ends in failure.
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London
Re: Royal Mail bosses employing 'unusual uses of the English language to give inaccurate statements'
Would you buy a second hand car off Thompson or any of his cronys?
I know I wouldn't.
I know I wouldn't.