ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Trading update

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
pieoftheday
Posts: 1834
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 16:43
Gender: Male

Re: Trading update

Post by pieoftheday »

Slim2none wrote:
26 Jan 2023, 11:48
My mate just showed me a bbc article stating that the company are indeed losing £1M a day.....The article is from 2002!!

About time they came up with a different number!
Alan Leighton was in charge then ? You could get a lot more for your £1 million back then so relatively speaking RM arnt doing too bad :nana
Barnacle
Posts: 2881
Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
Gender: Female
Location: Earth

Re: Trading update

Post by Barnacle »

Wasn’t Thompson brought in to halt losing £1m per day or is it per minute I forget?

Why hasn’t he been sacked yet?
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32751
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Trading update

Post by POSTMAN »

Image
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
Clappedoutpostie
Posts: 1255
Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
Gender: Male

Re: Trading update

Post by Clappedoutpostie »

Don’t forget there’s plenty of money for bonuses to push through the next round of bad revisions.
chrisj
Posts: 1883
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
Gender: Male

Re: Trading update

Post by chrisj »

Slim2none wrote:
26 Jan 2023, 11:48
My mate just showed me a bbc article stating that the company are indeed losing £1M a day.....The article is from 2002!!

About time they came up with a different number!
I agree! Why does he keep saying '£1 million' a day,? He does not have to be that specific or repetitive about exactly £1 million a day.

It was actually £1.2 millions by some financial analyst a few weeks back...

He does get things wrong and I dont :left: think he is a natural public speaker or author - probably why he likes 'sorts of' social media platforms
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Trading update

Post by DirtyHarry »

Those guys tell so many lies now, the truth is fast disappearing over the horizon.
scotchy1962
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 865
Joined: 25 Mar 2020, 16:55
Gender: Male

Re: Trading update

Post by scotchy1962 »

LouBarlow wrote:
26 Jan 2023, 08:48
If you don’t see that mail and parcel volumes have dropped considerably I don’t believe you work for RM. It is the quietest January I’ve known in 20 years of being with the company. Worrying is right.
Not sure what planet you live on but my rural duty is not completed most days of the week, Monday and Tuesday i can sometimes complete but every other day is a failure. There's lapsing every day as well and they are about to implement the revisions, i also only work to time so things aint going to get better.
Chitchat
Posts: 366
Joined: 30 Jan 2013, 15:18
Gender: Male

Re: Trading update

Post by Chitchat »

What I got from this was, despite the strikes parcels volumes are still up 5%. When taking out the equation the one off effect of the pandemic.

And yes letters are down, but what else did royal mail expect when it treats them with such contempt.

And the best way to make royal mail profitable is to not pay two different people to deliver letter/parcels to the same house. I know royal mail has an agenda to privatize profits and nationalise losses. But it's clear that a. The government aren't giving royal mail an easy ride and letting them water down the USO and b. They aren't gonna give financial assistance either.
kazardaimenu
Posts: 1391
Joined: 13 Apr 2022, 19:11
Gender: Male

Re: Trading update

Post by kazardaimenu »

timbo1234 wrote:
26 Jan 2023, 10:06
Schiff wrote:
26 Jan 2023, 09:20
So they have lost 295 million pounds in 275 days, with 200 million being down to the strikes. They then go on to repeat the claim that they continue to lose a million a day.

Surely if they were losing a million a day then it should have been 475 million - a million a day for 275 days plus the 200 million due to strike action.
Absolutely correct. The figures quoted don't add up. More lies?
We need the select committee to grill him over these numbers. Seems they are being plucked from thin air. Can RM supply a breakdown in how the strikes cost £10+ mil a day
mjd24
Posts: 1404
Joined: 11 May 2008, 18:48

Re: Trading update

Post by mjd24 »

Barnacle wrote:
26 Jan 2023, 12:22
Parcel volumes down 21%. Don’t think Simon’s going to hit his 40% increase in parcels any time soon. Pity he has thrown all the money at parcels.
Parcel volumes up 5% compared to pre pandemic.
anthonyok
Posts: 81
Joined: 13 Oct 2007, 17:53

Re: Trading update

Post by anthonyok »

It is quiet but are they keeping stuff back to justify the revisions ? Always in Jan we have a hammering on the flats , should be even more volume of them with the xmas chaos ? somethings not quite right ?
postieblueshirt
Posts: 1241
Joined: 01 Oct 2019, 22:05
Gender: Male

Re: Trading update

Post by postieblueshirt »

LouBarlow wrote:
26 Jan 2023, 08:48
If you don’t see that mail and parcel volumes have dropped considerably I don’t believe you work for RM. It is the quietest January I’ve known in 20 years of being with the company. Worrying is right.
not quiet enough to get my vr though
Duesouth
Posts: 273
Joined: 14 Sep 2018, 17:25
Gender: Male

Re: Trading update

Post by Duesouth »

Barnacle wrote:
26 Jan 2023, 12:22
Parcel volumes down 21%. Don’t think Simon’s going to hit his 40% increase in parcels any time soon. Pity he has thrown all the money at parcels.
He has thrown money at these super hubs, 'which are going great', his words not mine.

If we don't have enough parcels going through these massive hubs then what's the point in these hubs. Simon had a dream last year, which is now turning into a nightmare.

Two main objectives for Simon & co is to make as much money as possible by stripping everything including our terms and conditions, and getting rid of the union. Hes already doing the first part and is really doing a great job by losing a lot of part time staff because there are better jobs out there.
Seymour Buts
Posts: 1148
Joined: 22 Jun 2017, 20:17
Gender: Male

Re: Trading update

Post by Seymour Buts »

anthonyok wrote:
26 Jan 2023, 18:48
It is quiet but are they keeping stuff back to justify the revisions ? Always in Jan we have a hammering on the flats , should be even more volume of them with the xmas chaos ? somethings not quite right ?
No. This holding stuff back stuff is nonsense conspiracy. What has happened is they've lost massive contracts, but are pushing revisions through on that basis. What happens when they win those contracts back? Which they will, once this dispute is resolved.
Last edited by Seymour Buts on 26 Jan 2023, 19:34, edited 1 time in total.
kazardaimenu
Posts: 1391
Joined: 13 Apr 2022, 19:11
Gender: Male

Re: Trading update

Post by kazardaimenu »

Seymour Buts wrote:
26 Jan 2023, 19:19
anthonyok wrote:
26 Jan 2023, 18:48
It is quiet but are they keeping stuff back to justify the revisions ? Always in Jan we have a hammering on the flats , should be even more volume of them with the xmas chaos ? somethings not quite right ?
No. This holding stuff back stuff is nonsense conspiracy. What has happened is they've lost massive contracts, but are pushing revisions through on that basis. What happens when they win those contracts backs? Which they will, once this dispute is resolved.
:chuckle reverse revisions?