ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Royal Mail boss forced to use security escort as strikes turn ugly

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
pieoftheday
Posts: 1834
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 16:43
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail boss forced to use security escort as strikes turn ugly

Post by pieoftheday »

The business can survive if it doesn't make a profit, the geezer that started Amazon told investors not to expect a return for the first 20years and yet they poured money in
SSkUNkY
Posts: 147
Joined: 02 Nov 2014, 19:00
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail boss forced to use security escort as strikes turn ugly

Post by SSkUNkY »

The coward shouldn't be allowed on site.
enskied
Posts: 1877
Joined: 16 Aug 2013, 17:14
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail boss forced to use security escort as strikes turn ugly

Post by enskied »

Royalman68 wrote:
22 Dec 2022, 18:22
Slim2none wrote:
22 Dec 2022, 17:15



Giving a false or misleading business financial statement is a serious criminal offence. The culprit could receive imprisonment for up to 2 years, a fine of millions, or both. Remember, Tesco was fined £193 million to settle an accounting scandal from 2014. They overstated their profit. Royal Mail could have gone under if it were not for cross-subsidy from profitable GLS. So if your theory does not hold water.
A company that has been giving false information to it's regulator for over four years.

Just because something is a criminal offense does not mean it doesn't happen. As your Tesco's example proves.
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Royal Mail boss forced to use security escort as strikes turn ugly

Post by DirtyHarry »

'Security detail'
How very American.
Only it sounds like bullshit when used in reference to a four eyed, spotty faced, sack of s**t, like Thompson.
Flashman_
Posts: 363
Joined: 05 Jan 2010, 00:08
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail boss forced to use security escort as strikes turn ugly

Post by Flashman_ »

I know its a bit of a cliche, but Methinks royalman68 must be an ST fanboy or a ass-licking boss. All of his pathetic posts have been aimed at dissuading us to not strike and he has only been on here sice September.
Wolf91
Posts: 506
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail boss forced to use security escort as strikes turn ugly

Post by Wolf91 »

Flashman_ wrote:
23 Dec 2022, 18:08
I know its a bit of a cliche, but Methinks royalman68 must be an ST fanboy or a ass-licking boss. All of his pathetic posts have been aimed at dissuading us to not strike and he has only been on here sice September.
There’s plenty on here. He’s not the only one.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72657
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Royal Mail boss forced to use security escort as strikes turn ugly

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Flashman_ wrote:
23 Dec 2022, 18:08
I know its a bit of a cliche, but Methinks royalman68 must be an ST fanboy or a ass-licking boss. All of his pathetic posts have been aimed at dissuading us to not strike and he has only been on here sice September.
I'm afraid I disagree with a lot of people's opinions on here but we should not stop alternative ideas from being aired or we run the risk of becoming an Echo Chamber and ultimately becoming pointless and irrelevant.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
tractorboy2
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 545
Joined: 18 Jan 2012, 11:03
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail boss forced to use security escort as strikes turn ugly

Post by tractorboy2 »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
24 Dec 2022, 08:19
Flashman_ wrote:
23 Dec 2022, 18:08
I know its a bit of a cliche, but Methinks royalman68 must be an ST fanboy or a ass-licking boss. All of his pathetic posts have been aimed at dissuading us to not strike and he has only been on here sice September.
I'm afraid I disagree with a lot of people's opinions on here but we should not stop alternative ideas from being aired or we run the risk of becoming an Echo Chamber and ultimately becoming pointless and irrelevant.
It already is an echo chamber. Some posters post the same thing over and over , I've read it once , I know their view on it, and I don't need to see it again.