I think we need to clarify how Mail is defined in the statements issued by RM and how we as foot soldiers define the phrase.clashcityrocker wrote: ↑15 Dec 2022, 15:05Back in the days when people used bikes they only had a 2 hour delivery span. They didn't have any parcels.
Back in those days everybody got a gas bill, an electricity bill, a credit card bill, a telephone bill and everyone paid by cheque effectively doubling the amount of mail. 4 bank statements every year, now that has largely disappeared and probably will totally in the next couple of years. Fewer people receive the Radio Times.
My delivery span has more than doubled yet the number of letters hasn't.
Catalogues have increased but I doubt if they have a long term future. I deliver Damart catalogues but never any for BooHoo or Pokemon. As the older generation die off so will the catalogues.
So while you might think you are delivering tonnes of mail it isn't anything like it was. When people say mail is down it isn't because they don't count DSA or only count bank statements, it is because the mail is down. Anyone who thinks otherwise is deluded.
The old boys in my rural office consistently go on about how back in the day the mail coming out to the office from the mail centres consisted of about 4 bags of mail and 2 bags of packets. Staffed consisted of 2 full times 2 part times using 2 vans 1 bike and a walk. In my time at RM the quantity of mail heading out to our office has always been a Partner sized van rammed with bags of parcels and packets and on average between 20 and 30 boxes of mail. Currently staffed by 3 full timers about to be reduced to 2. Due to housing developments there has been an increase in delivery points.
The number of stamped or franked mail has dropped but the amount of advertising mail has more than doubled and obviously parcel and packets have increased exponentially.
Only thing that the board consider is profits and are happy to push more and more work on fewer and fewer workers the physical and emotional and family consequences for the employee is of no consequence to them. If as I read they can not afford redundancies expect managers to deliberately target people with performance and conduct codes as a means of reducing staff and payouts.