ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Children's presents

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Children's presents

Post by aiden01 »

chickenwittle wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 16:01
scotchy1962 wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:50
redlen wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:24
Now who was it that balloted for strike action over a pay claim tearing up the legal protections in the Agenda for Growth (No strike agreement) allowing Simon Thompson his real intention to go after terms and condition with impunity?
Really Redlan is this your narrative, union bashing every chance you get. How about a bit of support for your fellow worker and some recognition that Simple Slyman and Royal Fail have some responsibility in all of this.
Read back through all his previous posts , he’s a plant , ignore him .
Actually agree with him that there was a ""no strike agreement"" in the agenda for growth which has now let the ceo rip everything up.
derricksmyth
Posts: 353
Joined: 13 Sep 2012, 17:58
Gender: Male

Re: Children's presents

Post by derricksmyth »

aiden01 wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 17:22
chickenwittle wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 16:01
scotchy1962 wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:50
redlen wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:24
Now who was it that balloted for strike action over a pay claim tearing up the legal protections in the Agenda for Growth (No strike agreement) allowing Simon Thompson his real intention to go after terms and condition with impunity?
Really Redlan is this your narrative, union bashing every chance you get. How about a bit of support for your fellow worker and some recognition that Simple Slyman and Royal Fail have some responsibility in all of this.
Read back through all his previous posts , he’s a plant , ignore him .
Actually agree with him that there was a ""no strike agreement"" in the agenda for growth which has now let the ceo rip everything up.
I don't think it would have mattered anyway because Thompson was hellbent on using Executive action and ignoring the union anyway. No way we were going to bend over and take it !!!
enskied
Posts: 1877
Joined: 16 Aug 2013, 17:14
Gender: Male

Re: Children's presents

Post by enskied »

What!! I asked for an Action Man, ended up Christmas morning with a Little big man.
Kids need to be disappointed early.
antcpfc
Posts: 627
Joined: 18 Sep 2007, 17:25

Re: Children's presents

Post by antcpfc »

scotchy1962 wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:50
redlen wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:24
Now who was it that balloted for strike action over a pay claim tearing up the legal protections in the Agenda for Growth (No strike agreement) allowing Simon Thompson his real intention to go after terms and condition with impunity?
Really Redlan is this your narrative, union bashing every chance you get. How about a bit of support for your fellow worker and some recognition that Simple Slyman and Royal Fail have some responsibility in all of this.
Ignore him. How he calls himself redlen I have no idea.😂
Slider tool. Lol.
Hador
Posts: 26
Joined: 16 Apr 2013, 18:30
Gender: Male

Re: Children's presents

Post by Hador »

aiden01 wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 17:22
chickenwittle wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 16:01
scotchy1962 wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:50
redlen wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:24
Now who was it that balloted for strike action over a pay claim tearing up the legal protections in the Agenda for Growth (No strike agreement) allowing Simon Thompson his real intention to go after terms and condition with impunity?
Really Redlan is this your narrative, union bashing every chance you get. How about a bit of support for your fellow worker and some recognition that Simple Slyman and Royal Fail have some responsibility in all of this.
Read back through all his previous posts , he’s a plant , ignore him .
Actually agree with him that there was a ""no strike agreement"" in the agenda for growth which has now let the ceo rip everything up.
Ironic we start the strike for better pay. Because of strike we lost our T&C. Now some people say strike is not about the money is about T&C.
Rumple
Posts: 428
Joined: 20 Nov 2013, 10:45
Gender: Male

Re: Children's presents

Post by Rumple »

redlen wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:24
Now who was it that balloted for strike action over a pay claim tearing up the legal protections in the Agenda for Growth (No strike agreement) allowing Simon Thompson his real intention to go after terms and condition with impunity?
Ok Redlen, I’ll play your game. How would you have approached the disagreement on both pay and t&c’s?
midegarelu
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 414
Joined: 12 Sep 2009, 07:09
Gender: Male
Location: somewhere over the rainbow

Re: Children's presents

Post by midegarelu »

Rumple wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 17:59
redlen wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:24
Now who was it that balloted for strike action over a pay claim tearing up the legal protections in the Agenda for Growth (No strike agreement) allowing Simon Thompson his real intention to go after terms and condition with impunity?
Ok Redlen, I’ll play your game. How would you have approached the disagreement on both pay and t&c’s?

Stop feeding the troll.

:arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh
"We employ you so we can sack you"
FilthyBloke
Posts: 685
Joined: 03 Jun 2018, 11:41
Gender: Male

Re: Children's presents

Post by FilthyBloke »

redlen wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:24
Now who was it that balloted for strike action over a pay claim tearing up the legal protections in the Agenda for Growth (No strike agreement) allowing Simon Thompson his real intention to go after terms and condition with impunity?
This is the key. The CWU either overlooked that issue or thought they could get their pay deal and underestimated the CEO.
CRIBMAD
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 835
Joined: 11 Oct 2016, 13:38
Gender: Male

Re: Children's presents

Post by CRIBMAD »

Rumple wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 17:59
redlen wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:24
Now who was it that balloted for strike action over a pay claim tearing up the legal protections in the Agenda for Growth (No strike agreement) allowing Simon Thompson his real intention to go after terms and condition with impunity?
Ok Redlen, I’ll play your game. How would you have approached the disagreement on both pay and t&c’s?
only game i want these thompson twins to play is TICK ON THE M6 !
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3210
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Children's presents

Post by Acca Dacca »

FilthyBloke wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 19:38
redlen wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:24
Now who was it that balloted for strike action over a pay claim tearing up the legal protections in the Agenda for Growth (No strike agreement) allowing Simon Thompson his real intention to go after terms and condition with impunity?
This is the key. The CWU either overlooked that issue or thought they could get their pay deal and underestimated the CEO.
I’ve asked you this before and you never replied

What do you think they should have done instead? And why do you think it would have got us what we want/stop what we don’t.
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
Wullie10
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 710
Joined: 30 Jul 2017, 12:07
Gender: Male
Location: Retired

Re: Children's presents

Post by Wullie10 »

Who's worried about Christmas ? That fat bastard Boris cancelled Christmas on the advice of his power crazed Marxist scientists . Everyone who accepted that then is getting what they deserve now . They can't stick their toys presents where the sun don't shine. If anyone accuses you of spoiling Christmas remind them when you kept working ..
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Children's presents

Post by aiden01 »

Wullie10 wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 21:14
Who's worried about Christmas ? That fat bastard Boris cancelled Christmas on the advice of his power crazed Marxist scientists . Everyone who accepted that then is getting what they deserve now . They can't stick their toys presents where the sun don't shine. If anyone accuses you of spoiling Christmas remind them when you kept working ..
So yet another covid denier ffs have you had it yet if not hope so soon a yr later im still f--ked
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Children's presents

Post by aiden01 »

derricksmyth wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 17:28
aiden01 wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 17:22
chickenwittle wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 16:01
scotchy1962 wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:50
redlen wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:24
Now who was it that balloted for strike action over a pay claim tearing up the legal protections in the Agenda for Growth (No strike agreement) allowing Simon Thompson his real intention to go after terms and condition with impunity?
Really Redlan is this your narrative, union bashing every chance you get. How about a bit of support for your fellow worker and some recognition that Simple Slyman and Royal Fail have some responsibility in all of this.
Read back through all his previous posts , he’s a plant , ignore him .
Actually agree with him that there was a ""no strike agreement"" in the agenda for growth which has now let the ceo rip everything up.
I don't think it would have mattered anyway because Thompson was hellbent on using Executive action and ignoring the union anyway. No way we were going to bend over and take it !!!
But he could only use ea as above agreement.
rambo1
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3266
Joined: 12 Jun 2013, 20:00
Gender: Male

Re: Children's presents

Post by rambo1 »

CRIBMAD wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:18
lazy twats should get off their fat arses and go shopping then !
:thumbup
aiden01
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 7001
Joined: 27 Feb 2013, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Children's presents

Post by aiden01 »

rambo1 wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 22:56
CRIBMAD wrote:
14 Dec 2022, 15:18
lazy twats should get off their fat arses and go shopping then !
:thumbup
And then if everyone does that where does our f--king job go ffs.