ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Thompson's letter to the public

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
cobrakai
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 320
Joined: 13 Dec 2007, 17:17

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by cobrakai »

There’s been less than 10 in all our mc. Out of 900+

The picket line is getting bigger every strike too
Andyh335
Posts: 22
Joined: 23 Jul 2022, 12:43
Gender: Male

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by Andyh335 »

POSTPERSON50 wrote:
08 Dec 2022, 13:34
Andyh335 wrote:
08 Dec 2022, 13:33
How many out of those 170 are on part time contracts?
Split at my unit is 40% ft, 60% pt

190 if you include 20 agency staff who heroically have all stayed out on strike days despite their own threats of being replaced.
Easy for a PT to justify the time off though, they are losing maybe £50 net for each day of strike with the backup of maybe a second job or someone in the household on a much higher income, seems like maybe they hang around because of the benefits outside of pay, the documents I’ve seen from Thomson state, ‘sick policy unchanged for first absence’ and his latest letter now confirming no compulsory redundancy.
Splappy_McSplap
Posts: 226
Joined: 02 Sep 2009, 13:55
Gender: Male

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by Splappy_McSplap »

No, it's harder for PT to stay out on strike days. I am FT and I could do 4 days instead of 5 forever, even 3 isn't bad as a single man with a mortgage and no drinking or gambling habits but if I was PT and especially working on a 3 day a week attendance on a 25 hour contract and needed OT to even make a living, staying out even one of those three days would be tough.

So, kudos to all the part timers who have held out.
Andyh335 wrote:
08 Dec 2022, 13:46
the documents I’ve seen from Thomson state, ‘sick policy unchanged for first absence’ and his latest letter now confirming no compulsory redundancy.
Only a certain type of poster believes anything ST says or writes. Especially when he comes out with this "up to 9%" nonsense. The only thing worse than a liar is a bad liar.
Andyh335
Posts: 22
Joined: 23 Jul 2022, 12:43
Gender: Male

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by Andyh335 »

You won’t be able to do 4 days forever as the competitors will have hoovered up all the work by then.
Parky22
Posts: 8
Joined: 30 Oct 2022, 17:27
Gender: Female

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by Parky22 »

Andyh335 wrote:
08 Dec 2022, 13:46
POSTPERSON50 wrote:
08 Dec 2022, 13:34
Andyh335 wrote:
08 Dec 2022, 13:33
How many out of those 170 are on part time contracts?
Split at my unit is 40% ft, 60% pt

190 if you include 20 agency staff who heroically have all stayed out on strike days despite their own threats of being replaced.
Easy for a PT to justify the time off though, they are losing maybe £50 net for each day of strike with the backup of maybe a second job or someone in the household on a much higher income, seems like maybe they hang around because of the benefits outside of pay, the documents I’ve seen from Thomson state, ‘sick policy unchanged for first absence’ and his latest letter now confirming no compulsory redundancy.
I'm part time 30 hours, my partner doesn't work due to ill health, so losing £170 odd last week isn't good. Still striking though with the rest
employee1
Posts: 37
Joined: 19 Sep 2019, 23:14
Gender: Female

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by employee1 »

That letter should have started 'Once upon a time'. Hans Christian Andersen's fairy stories were more believable!
Splappy_McSplap
Posts: 226
Joined: 02 Sep 2009, 13:55
Gender: Male

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by Splappy_McSplap »

Andyh335 wrote:
08 Dec 2022, 14:03
You won’t be able to do 4 days forever as the competitors will have hoovered up all the work by then.
Yeah, like I said, a certain type of poster.
thebigone
Posts: 153
Joined: 29 Apr 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by thebigone »

1 out of 100 (Nottingham north)
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3211
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by Acca Dacca »

So why only last week did he send a letter to Andy Furey asking to meet to work out what criteria the compulsory redundancies would be made on? And putting forward their own suggestions for what the criteria might be?

We have all seen it there in black and white.

If it was a threat he wasn’t going to carry out and served only to put the fear of God into people before Xmas that they might soon be unemployed then he is the absolute lowest of the low.
Last edited by Acca Dacca on 08 Dec 2022, 14:28, edited 2 times in total.
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
FilthyBloke
Posts: 685
Joined: 03 Jun 2018, 11:41
Gender: Male

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by FilthyBloke »

Doesn’t seem like the recent talks went well
Cedar_Room
Posts: 826
Joined: 31 Aug 2007, 14:09

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by Cedar_Room »

As if Simon wrote the letter :crazy:
“Shorts,in this weather?!”

“If they’re bills I don’t want ‘em!”

“What’s she been ordering now?”
CRIBMAD
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 835
Joined: 11 Oct 2016, 13:38
Gender: Male

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by CRIBMAD »

FilthyBloke wrote:
08 Dec 2022, 14:25
Doesn’t seem like the recent talks went well
what have you heard ? i thought as much myself when the cwu were still organizing fridays rally
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3211
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by Acca Dacca »

In fact wait, when he says no compulsory redundancies has he just missed out the 'until March 2023 at the earliest' part?
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
Minischoles
ROYAL MAIL CUSTOMER SERVICE
Posts: 154
Joined: 02 Jun 2012, 05:53
Gender: Male

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by Minischoles »

For the strike breakers, bear in mind they're probably counting other parts of the business as well, not just delivery (to fudge the numbers even more).

I know for example that there are a fair few people in Customer Service who came in on the last two days, and there are probably those in all the other back office roles coming in.

So it could very well be there's 11,000 people in, but like half of those are in roles that don't deliver or process any mail.
Chitchat
Posts: 366
Joined: 30 Jan 2013, 15:18
Gender: Male

Re: Thompson's letter to the public

Post by Chitchat »

How can you have two people doing the exact same job, but one is paid 20% less?