ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Update

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3193
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Update

Post by Acca Dacca »

Mr Rush wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:10
Acca Dacca wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 11:31
We all knew change was coming with the USO
I hate to harp on about this, but this is the hill I am going to die on.

The USO is not changing. Parliament hasn't changed the law and parliament is highly unlikely to change it for the forseeable future. The delivery specification remains a six day service. All that Ofcom (not parliament) changed was relaxing the targets for 2nd Class to enable the ODM to meet the spec on a technicality.
Rommagic wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 16:07
6 into 8 is the same as 3 into 4.
Mathematically, yes. Yet six bodies is more than three so they'll be digging far less of a hole for themselves.
The union are calling it “the USO” when talking about the changes so that’s why I’m calling it the USO

See their update

I dont get your last part

For every 8 duties 6 posties cover them is the same as 3 doing 4 walks and another 3 doing another 4 walks

It’s still six bodies covering 8 walks
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
Perseus
Posts: 1000
Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
Gender: Male

Re: Update

Post by Perseus »

Hull Malmo Road DO is being hailed on Robin App as a Pilot Success story.

Any insight into this?
BenacreNick
Posts: 1155
Joined: 18 Jul 2022, 13:27
Gender: Male

Re: Update

Post by BenacreNick »

Rommagic wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 16:07
What about 5 into 6.
6 into 6 might just work Rommagic ? :hmmmm
Rommagic
Posts: 1464
Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 16:52

Re: Update

Post by Rommagic »

No savings in 6 into 6.
Pidleypoo
Posts: 698
Joined: 17 Dec 2014, 10:05
Gender: Male

Re: Update

Post by Pidleypoo »

Acca Dacca wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:30
Mr Rush wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:10
Acca Dacca wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 11:31
We all knew change was coming with the USO
I hate to harp on about this, but this is the hill I am going to die on.

The USO is not changing. Parliament hasn't changed the law and parliament is highly unlikely to change it for the forseeable future. The delivery specification remains a six day service. All that Ofcom (not parliament) changed was relaxing the targets for 2nd Class to enable the ODM to meet the spec on a technicality.
Rommagic wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 16:07
6 into 8 is the same as 3 into 4.
Mathematically, yes. Yet six bodies is more than three so they'll be digging far less of a hole for themselves.
The union are calling it “the USO” when talking about the changes so that’s why I’m calling it the USO

See their update

I dont get your last part

For every 8 duties 6 posties cover them is the same as 3 doing 4 walks and another 3 doing another 4 walks

It’s still six bodies covering 8 walks
People can’t be being serious with not understanding that 6/8 is exactly the same as 3/4.

IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

Might as well say 12/16 or 24/32 …….and so on.

It would just like out union to try and flog that.
Cedar_Room
Posts: 825
Joined: 31 Aug 2007, 14:09

Re: Update

Post by Cedar_Room »

Perseus wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:47
Hull Malmo Road DO is being hailed on Robin App as a Pilot Success story.

Any insight into this?
Salsbury as well,wasn’t it? Gaffer,workplace coach & some youngster endorsing it over on the Robin app…can’t say they looked very happy though! :chuckle
“Shorts,in this weather?!”

“If they’re bills I don’t want ‘em!”

“What’s she been ordering now?”
Mr Rush
Posts: 3135
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: Update

Post by Mr Rush »

Pidleypoo wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 18:38
People can’t be being serious with not understanding that 6/8 is exactly the same as 3/4.

IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

Might as well say 12/16 or 24/32 …….and so on.

It would just like out union to try and flog that.
It could also be expressed as 1.5:2. Why limit ourselves to integer numbers of staff?
The machine stops.
buchanpeter
Posts: 113
Joined: 06 Apr 2013, 20:52
Gender: Male

Re: Update

Post by buchanpeter »

The union odm is actually 8 into 7.
Where during the summer it's 8 into 6.
That's the last thing they offered royal mail before the negotiations went silent for the talks.
tramssirhc
Posts: 1689
Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
Gender: Male

Re: Update

Post by tramssirhc »

Pidleypoo wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 18:38
Acca Dacca wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:30
Mr Rush wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:10
Acca Dacca wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 11:31
We all knew change was coming with the USO
I hate to harp on about this, but this is the hill I am going to die on.

The USO is not changing. Parliament hasn't changed the law and parliament is highly unlikely to change it for the forseeable future. The delivery specification remains a six day service. All that Ofcom (not parliament) changed was relaxing the targets for 2nd Class to enable the ODM to meet the spec on a technicality.
Rommagic wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 16:07
6 into 8 is the same as 3 into 4.
Mathematically, yes. Yet six bodies is more than three so they'll be digging far less of a hole for themselves.
The union are calling it “the USO” when talking about the changes so that’s why I’m calling it the USO

See their update

I dont get your last part

For every 8 duties 6 posties cover them is the same as 3 doing 4 walks and another 3 doing another 4 walks

It’s still six bodies covering 8 walks
People can’t be being serious with not understanding that 6/8 is exactly the same as 3/4.

IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

Might as well say 12/16 or 24/32 …….and so on.

It would just like out union to try and flog that.
Martin Walsh will tell you it's a 12.5% saving and the CWU are victorious.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3193
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Update

Post by Acca Dacca »

tramssirhc wrote:
19 Mar 2026, 07:35
Pidleypoo wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 18:38
Acca Dacca wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:30
Mr Rush wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:10
Acca Dacca wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 11:31
We all knew change was coming with the USO
I hate to harp on about this, but this is the hill I am going to die on.

The USO is not changing. Parliament hasn't changed the law and parliament is highly unlikely to change it for the forseeable future. The delivery specification remains a six day service. All that Ofcom (not parliament) changed was relaxing the targets for 2nd Class to enable the ODM to meet the spec on a technicality.
Rommagic wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 16:07
6 into 8 is the same as 3 into 4.
Mathematically, yes. Yet six bodies is more than three so they'll be digging far less of a hole for themselves.
The union are calling it “the USO” when talking about the changes so that’s why I’m calling it the USO

See their update

I dont get your last part

For every 8 duties 6 posties cover them is the same as 3 doing 4 walks and another 3 doing another 4 walks

It’s still six bodies covering 8 walks
People can’t be being serious with not understanding that 6/8 is exactly the same as 3/4.

IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

Might as well say 12/16 or 24/32 …….and so on.

It would just like out union to try and flog that.
Martin Walsh will tell you it's a 12.5% saving and the CWU are victorious.
Well it’sd actually be half the number of walk losses compared to RMs plan
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
tramssirhc
Posts: 1689
Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
Gender: Male

Re: Update

Post by tramssirhc »

Acca Dacca wrote:
19 Mar 2026, 10:50
tramssirhc wrote:
19 Mar 2026, 07:35
Pidleypoo wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 18:38
Acca Dacca wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:30
Mr Rush wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:10
Acca Dacca wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 11:31
We all knew change was coming with the USO
I hate to harp on about this, but this is the hill I am going to die on.

The USO is not changing. Parliament hasn't changed the law and parliament is highly unlikely to change it for the forseeable future. The delivery specification remains a six day service. All that Ofcom (not parliament) changed was relaxing the targets for 2nd Class to enable the ODM to meet the spec on a technicality.
Rommagic wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 16:07
6 into 8 is the same as 3 into 4.
Mathematically, yes. Yet six bodies is more than three so they'll be digging far less of a hole for themselves.
The union are calling it “the USO” when talking about the changes so that’s why I’m calling it the USO

See their update

I dont get your last part

For every 8 duties 6 posties cover them is the same as 3 doing 4 walks and another 3 doing another 4 walks

It’s still six bodies covering 8 walks
People can’t be being serious with not understanding that 6/8 is exactly the same as 3/4.

IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

Might as well say 12/16 or 24/32 …….and so on.

It would just like out union to try and flog that.
Martin Walsh will tell you it's a 12.5% saving and the CWU are victorious.
Well it’sd actually be half the number of walk losses compared to RMs plan
If won't. Its the same, just that the slices of cake got thinner.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3193
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Update

Post by Acca Dacca »

tramssirhc wrote:
19 Mar 2026, 12:51
Acca Dacca wrote:
19 Mar 2026, 10:50
tramssirhc wrote:
19 Mar 2026, 07:35
Pidleypoo wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 18:38
Acca Dacca wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:30
Mr Rush wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:10
Acca Dacca wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 11:31
We all knew change was coming with the USO
I hate to harp on about this, but this is the hill I am going to die on.

The USO is not changing. Parliament hasn't changed the law and parliament is highly unlikely to change it for the forseeable future. The delivery specification remains a six day service. All that Ofcom (not parliament) changed was relaxing the targets for 2nd Class to enable the ODM to meet the spec on a technicality.
Rommagic wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 16:07
6 into 8 is the same as 3 into 4.
Mathematically, yes. Yet six bodies is more than three so they'll be digging far less of a hole for themselves.
The union are calling it “the USO” when talking about the changes so that’s why I’m calling it the USO

See their update

I dont get your last part

For every 8 duties 6 posties cover them is the same as 3 doing 4 walks and another 3 doing another 4 walks

It’s still six bodies covering 8 walks
People can’t be being serious with not understanding that 6/8 is exactly the same as 3/4.

IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

Might as well say 12/16 or 24/32 …….and so on.

It would just like out union to try and flog that.
Martin Walsh will tell you it's a 12.5% saving and the CWU are victorious.
Well it’sd actually be half the number of walk losses compared to RMs plan
If won't. Its the same, just that the slices of cake got thinner.
No

It actually is

Removing 1 walk in 4 is double the number of walk losses as 1 in 8
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
postslippete
Posts: 4122
Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
Gender: Male

Re: Update

Post by postslippete »

Perseus wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:47
Hull Malmo Road DO is being hailed on Robin App as a Pilot Success story.

Any insight into this?

We need more information than just a Robin app promo video. For example, the outdoor spans, call rates, lapsing, sickness, DPR failures. And if some of those pilot offices were a "success" then what were the staffing levels, the traffic profile and overtime levels in those offices compared with a normal office?

Was the model only "working" because extra money, overtime and management attention were being thrown at those pilot offices?

Hmmmm
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
Perseus
Posts: 1000
Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
Gender: Male

Re: Update

Post by Perseus »

postslippete wrote:
19 Mar 2026, 21:49
Perseus wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:47
Hull Malmo Road DO is being hailed on Robin App as a Pilot Success story.

Any insight into this?

We need more information than just a Robin app promo video. For example, the outdoor spans, call rates, lapsing, sickness, DPR failures. And if some of those pilot offices were a "success" then what were the staffing levels, the traffic profile and overtime levels in those offices compared with a normal office?

Was the model only "working" because extra money, overtime and management attention were being thrown at those pilot offices?

Hmmmm
I totally agree.
It stands to reason that with the huge differences from office to office across the country of all the parameters you mention that determined the chances of any ‘success’ of any type of ODM.
I doubt we will ever get a deep dive into the workings of it.
ted_e_bear
Posts: 3961
Joined: 03 Sep 2012, 19:37
Gender: Male

Re: Update

Post by ted_e_bear »

postslippete wrote:
19 Mar 2026, 21:49
Perseus wrote:
18 Mar 2026, 17:47
Hull Malmo Road DO is being hailed on Robin App as a Pilot Success story.

Any insight into this?

We need more information than just a Robin app promo video. For example, the outdoor spans, call rates, lapsing, sickness, DPR failures. And if some of those pilot offices were a "success" then what were the staffing levels, the traffic profile and overtime levels in those offices compared with a normal office?

Was the model only "working" because extra money, overtime and management attention were being thrown at those pilot offices?

Hmmmm
Yeah that would be interesting to know, it's a big office had 106 duties according to that network review spreadsheet from a couple of years ago