Letter to Branches
No 152/12
Ref: GS: 13.0
Date: 2nd March 2012
To: All Branches
Dear Colleagues
RPI to CPI Pension Indexation – Debate in The House of Commons Thursday 1st March 2012
Further to LTB 129/12 issued on 23rd February 2012, MPs debated the issue of Pension indexation changes from RPI to CPI in the House of Commons on Thursday 1st March 2012.
John McDonnell – Labour MP for Hayes and Harlington moved the following motion:-
That this House notes that the e-petition entitled Public and Private Pension Increases change from RPI to CPI attracted over 100,000 signatures very quickly, revealing a high level of concern about the Government’s decision to change the indexation for occupational pensions from the Retail Prices Index to the Consumer Price Index, which will mean that many people, both those retired and those yet to retire, will receive less in their pension payments than they were led to expect; and calls on the Government to reintroduce the RPI measure immediately.
33 MPs voted in favour of the motion with 232 against. The full debate can be accessed via the following link:-
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/p ... 0147000001" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Any enquiries to this LTB should be directed to me in the General Secretary’s Office.
Yours sincerely
W HAYES
General Secretary
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
RPI to CPI Pension Indexation – Debate in The House of Commo
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72545
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
RPI to CPI Pension Indexation – Debate in The House of Commo
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32699
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
Re: RPI to CPI Pension Indexation – Debate in The House of C
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-17444656" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Pension switch challenge is lost by unions
Trade unions have lost an appeal against a change in the way public sector pensions are protected against inflation.
The High Court ruled in December that the government's switch in calculations was lawful.
Trade unions had complained about how the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) was replacing the faster-rising Retail Prices Index (RPI) to uprate pensions.
Now they have lost the latest stage of their challenge at the Court of Appeal.
This confirms a reduction in the value of future annual pension increases for millions of public sector pensioners.
The policy also saves the government billions of pounds in the coming years and is a major area of disagreement within the public sector pensions dispute.
Calculations
CPI and RPI are measures of inflation - or the cost of living - based on the prices of baskets of goods and services. The RPI basket includes mortgage interest payments and some other housing costs, and is generally higher owing to the formula used to calculate it.
The use of CPI for inflation-proofing pensions was first applied in April last year.
It saw pensioners in schemes covering civil servants, teachers, NHS employees, local government and others, receiving an increase of 3.1% instead of 4.6%.
At the original court challenge in December, the trade unions' lawyers had argued that, in making the change, the government had acted beyond its powers granted by the Social Security Administration Act.
Judges found unanimously in favour of the government in three of four counts, and by a majority of 2-1 on a fourth. The Court of Appeal has now upheld this decision.
Two groups, mainly consisting of unions, launched the legal action. The Fire Brigades Union, NASUWT, Prison Officers Association, Public and Commercial Services union, Unison and Unite make up one group, while the other consists of Prospect, the FDA, GMB, Police Federation, National Association of Retired Police Officers and the Civil Service Pensioners' Alliance.
The judges agreed to allow the National Union of Teachers, Association of Principal Fire Officers and National Federation of Occupational Pensioners to join the challenge
Pension switch challenge is lost by unions
Trade unions have lost an appeal against a change in the way public sector pensions are protected against inflation.
The High Court ruled in December that the government's switch in calculations was lawful.
Trade unions had complained about how the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) was replacing the faster-rising Retail Prices Index (RPI) to uprate pensions.
Now they have lost the latest stage of their challenge at the Court of Appeal.
This confirms a reduction in the value of future annual pension increases for millions of public sector pensioners.
The policy also saves the government billions of pounds in the coming years and is a major area of disagreement within the public sector pensions dispute.
Calculations
CPI and RPI are measures of inflation - or the cost of living - based on the prices of baskets of goods and services. The RPI basket includes mortgage interest payments and some other housing costs, and is generally higher owing to the formula used to calculate it.
The use of CPI for inflation-proofing pensions was first applied in April last year.
It saw pensioners in schemes covering civil servants, teachers, NHS employees, local government and others, receiving an increase of 3.1% instead of 4.6%.
At the original court challenge in December, the trade unions' lawyers had argued that, in making the change, the government had acted beyond its powers granted by the Social Security Administration Act.
Judges found unanimously in favour of the government in three of four counts, and by a majority of 2-1 on a fourth. The Court of Appeal has now upheld this decision.
Two groups, mainly consisting of unions, launched the legal action. The Fire Brigades Union, NASUWT, Prison Officers Association, Public and Commercial Services union, Unison and Unite make up one group, while the other consists of Prospect, the FDA, GMB, Police Federation, National Association of Retired Police Officers and the Civil Service Pensioners' Alliance.
The judges agreed to allow the National Union of Teachers, Association of Principal Fire Officers and National Federation of Occupational Pensioners to join the challenge
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.