Danelectro wrote:PEC DOCUMENT
'Ongoing problems with deployment of BT2010,mostly as a result of an overestimation of what can be achieved
in delivery revisions'
This is clear as a shite in a bottle,where in the agreement does the overestimation lie? Are they implying that
amendments to the delivery revision part of the agreement are needed?(effective performance,BSI,Geo route etc) or
they just laying all the blame at Royal Mail Planners and DOMs,and if thats the case then the workshops were an
expensive exercise in fantasy role playing.Hopefully 58k Gibson can give some clarity to this issue raised by the PEC.
Gibbo needs to wipe the s**t from his eyes to see whats going on. He keeps on banging on bout whats in and whats not in the Agreement. he also states its all very clear. Just a quick question for Gibbo,"If its that clear (abuse deleted) why are there so many mis-understandings about it?" Surely every rep both local & area cant be that daft as to see there are huge holes in it.What Booby (thats meant by the way cause Gibbo is a real tit) needs to see is that a briefing for reps which hahahahahaha he may attend himself is needed. STOP HIDING BOBBY WE KNOW YOUR IN THERE........................SOMEWHERE