Firstly, at least you have some control over where your money goes in the DC pension. In the CDC you'll have absolutely no control.RobertT wrote: ↑23 Sep 2021, 04:18The success of DC pensions is also down to investment returns and the people who manage the funds you invest in.
67 isn't great, but personally I see that as just when I can take it(assuming I don't take it early), just as it's also when I get my state pension. It isn't necessarily when I have to retire!And the other biggest issue. The retirement age being set at 67. Show me the terms for accessing my money earlier! Otherwise I'll suspect the terms are god awful.
Lets face it, who on earth wants to be a postie at 67. The way this job is going, most folk won't make it to 60.
Many people will have other pensions tucked away either with RM or from other employers, which you don't have to wait until 67 to access in full. It's those schemes that will be important if you want to at least semi-retire earlier.
Ultimately it's your retirement and if you don't want to work until you drop, it's up to the individual to take charge of their own destiny. If what you've got isn't going to be enough for you, then it's down to you to do something about it.
Secondly, you're pretty much in agreement with my thinking. In that, you'll probably be penalised for accessing the CDC funds early, so you'd be better off waiting to 67 for that cash. Which would mean you'd have to rely on another pension (if you're lucky enough to have one), if you wanted to retire earlier. So in short, other schemes are likely to provide more flexibility, and autonomy with your own savings, than the CDC.
So there's no real disagreement here. I'd likely be better off in another scheme, as my plan is to use my pension to retire early. Not have excess cash at 68+ which I won't need.
Like I said, the warning sign is that there's no mention of the terms for earlier access to funds.