ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32587
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by POSTMAN »

https://www.cwu.org/ltb/ltb-185-25-rebu ... ot-result/

LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

No. 185/25

26th August 2025

Dear Colleagues,

REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO – MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Please find attached the scrutineers’ report for the Rebuilding Royal Mail Group Parts One and Two ballots.

Yes 79.5%

No 20.5%

This is a very strong yes vote of around 4 to 1. It is an emphatic endorsement of the union’s position and the agreements we have reached.

The turnout was 43.5%. This is comparable with most pay ballots of this nature.

The backpay due as a result of this agreement will be paid to weekly paid employees on 26th September. It will be paid to monthly paid employees on 30th September. This will include backpay on overtime, scheduled attendance and all elements of pay.

We will be issuing wider communications tomorrow on the EP Group/CWU agreement. We are also in the process of arranging an online briefing for all CWU local representatives and a live session for members.

Any enquiries in relation to the content of this LTB should be addressed to the SDGS Department (lparrett@cwu.org)

Thank you for your support.



Yours sincerely,



Martin Walsh Dave Ward

Deputy General Secretary (Postal)

I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
qwerty2
Posts: 1891
Joined: 30 Jun 2009, 00:42
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by qwerty2 »

More than half didn't bother voting :arrrghhh
as Liz Truss would say "THAT IS A DISGRACE" :d'oh!
Perseus
Posts: 778
Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by Perseus »

8 months after the CWU announced a ground breaking deal with EP Group, a part of the agreement has been voted in.

That's some going.
tramssirhc
Posts: 1495
Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by tramssirhc »

About 1/4 of the workers voted yes.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by BELIAL »

Membership engagement is hardly at fever pitch is it?
Bye
norris9
Posts: 2559
Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 17:32
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by norris9 »

Nice, we finally getting paid..... just gotta wait another month. :shock:
Perseus
Posts: 778
Joined: 21 Feb 2024, 16:45
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by Perseus »

tramssirhc wrote:
26 Aug 2025, 20:15
About 1/4 of the workers voted yes.
It would have to be a 70% plus turnout with everyone else voting no to overturn that 4-1 result.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32587
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by POSTMAN »

I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
Edward Hunter
Posts: 672
Joined: 23 May 2007, 22:30

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by Edward Hunter »

what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly :crazy:
BenacreNick
Posts: 1111
Joined: 18 Jul 2022, 13:27
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by BenacreNick »

Hands up if you would like to receive a nett pay-cut ?

What are the Union members thinking with a result like this :d'oh!
User avatar
Basildon Bond
Posts: 403
Joined: 21 Dec 2022, 19:21
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by Basildon Bond »

From the above PDF:
Number of eligible voters: 97,121
From various internet sources: Royal Mail employs around 130,000 - 150,000 staff (hard to say which groups are included).

So if those numbers are roughly true...you could estimate that about 65% to 75% of staff are in the union? Really? :hmmmm

And if that's true they all pay in for the privilege of voting and then do not actually cast their vote?

Not sure what to believe. Something does not seem to add up. Smacks of "Once a Catholic, always a Catholic". :whistle
Scointer
Posts: 36
Joined: 03 Jun 2023, 14:11
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by Scointer »

50,000 managers 🤣🤣🤣🤣
richietns
Posts: 1057
Joined: 17 Oct 2011, 18:09
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by richietns »

Edward Hunter wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 13:31
what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly :crazy:
The company is gonna plead poverty for the next decade while a billionaire owns it you couldn't make modern society up.
norris9
Posts: 2559
Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 17:32
Gender: Female

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by norris9 »

Edward Hunter wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 13:31
what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly :crazy:
Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.

Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense. :crazy:
qwerty2
Posts: 1891
Joined: 30 Jun 2009, 00:42
Gender: Male

Re: LTB 185-25 - REBUILDING ROYAL MAIL GROUP PARTS ONE AND TWO - MEMBERS BALLOT RESULT

Post by qwerty2 »

norris9 wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 18:06
Edward Hunter wrote:
27 Aug 2025, 13:31
what was the point it was always going to be accepted? Nobody would have been willing to strike in the hope of an extra %. It would have cost us more than we would gain in any case as the CWU agree that the company has no spare cash. Just need to get the "agreement" implimented to everyones satisfaction now. Im sure that will go smoothly :crazy:
Yeah, I have no idea why people are whining about the result, especially with the amount of people that were moaning about the last strikes we had and how much money they lost because of it.

Some posties would prefer to strike for 1% extra? The maths don't make any sense. :crazy:
The point is over 50% in the union didn't bother voting on pay!! :arrrghhh