I think your first line is all that people are looking for really-it’s arguable that there is more communication received from the company and their stance than there is from the union.Woody Guthrie wrote: ↑06 Sep 2022, 16:13I'm all for clear and open communication but this desperation to know every word spoken between both parties is taking things too far.
When there's something of interest to tell they'll tell us but this isn't Twitter and I don't need to know what Terry had for breakfast.
As far as I'm aware both Terry and Dave are touring the country meeting members, I think Dave is up in God's country tomorrow.
In a day and age where comms are free, simple to deliver and easy to distribute en masse there really isn’t any excuse to not put out a daily update-even if it were to say the company is still being intransigent then at least it delivers a clearer picture to those members who do appear to be living in hope of a postponement today or tomorrow for example.
We have other unions paying the wages of their members who are taking IA. Asking for frequent communication in a dispute which is seeing people lose at least 20% of their weekly wage is not the same as wanting to know whether it was fried eggs or scrambled.